The "Authorized" Bait and Switch: They had to have a license because industry and colleges and states were promised a license to CYA mandates. But a license brought liability. So they created a have your cake & eat it situation. Which vial will you get? A deeply fake situation. - Conspiracies

The "Authorized" Bait and Switch: They had to have a license because industry and colleges and states were promised a license to CYA mandates. But a license brought liability. So they created a have your cake & eat it situation. Which vial will you get? A deeply fake situation. (twitter.com)

posted 5 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 5 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +12 / -0

3 comments

3 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (3)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– axolotl_peyotl [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I recruited Dr. Meryl Nass for a /r/conspiracy AMA when this all went down (back when /r/conspiracy wasn't a shell of its former self and still held AMAs).

Dr. Nass continues:

FDA had to issue one...sparing Pfizer liability. The dangers of the vaccines were not part of the original plan. So the adverse events were covered up, and Woodcock the HCQ schemer issued a license in name only, while actually vaccinating Americans with the (identical) EUAvac

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– axolotl_peyotl [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Who cares about the next variant? The plan is to vaccinate everybody with a liability free vaccine that no longer works by making the public think they are getting a licensed product. But instead they will be given an EUA. FDA pulls rabbit from hat

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– axolotl_peyotl [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

There is no vaccine court option for EUAs, sadly, just an administrative procedure that denies 94% of applicants

the 8/23 approval letter to Pfizer says "the products are legally distinct"...I'm telling you this is a bait and switch

permalink save report block reply