3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's really interesting, but maybe a red herring:

There’s a recording of a conference call floating around where the woman says she met with POTUS at Maralago on Christmas Eve. It’s that one I’m talking about. I’m not done yet but there are serious issues with her story. These things take time.

meat of it is done in 20 min.

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

why more moderators exactly?

pron, spam, and occasional death threats.

He wasn't a moderator on r/conspiracy

sry that's what I meant.

he doesn't have full perms either btw

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

This serves as notification of your crime.

wtf are you talking about?

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

oh come off it

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

He who smelt it...

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

votes would be swarmed by shills dude.

This is the most hands off moderating job of all time.

we have public mod logs too, so there's that.

6
axolotl_peyotl 6 points ago +6 / -0

No announcement yet...going to do a sticky soon with updated guidelines too (not rules which we don't really need here).

we have public mod logs btw!

I was the only active mod here for most of the time, and PLC is someone that I trust who I've known for years that was not a moderator on reddit, which is a plus.

No new mods are planned atm, and definitely will announce if so.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

The judge said "I order the discharge of Assange"...I didn't realize that didn't mean "discharge". legalese is weird. I deleted this thread, calm down dude.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

correct, deleting this

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not what he said at all, he said he had yet to see evidence of enough fraud that could overturn the election.

That's a big difference, and way more evidence has come out even since he said that.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

that's awesome! I was around on digg too but only casually. Glad to have you here!

13
axolotl_peyotl 13 points ago +13 / -0

How do you honestly still buy into this shit.

Huh? How is posting a tweet in a conspiracy forum "buying into this shit."

Get a new hobby, your glow is practically effervescent.

10
axolotl_peyotl 10 points ago +10 / -0

Looks like he spends most of his time approving your comments

lol so true.

His latest ban was kinda questionable

I've only banned three non-spammers since the beginning, and they all were for actual violent rhetoric against .win users.

The latest example was among the worst forum sliders on the site, and recently said this in an already heated exchange:

You LARPers will surely be the first to go.

If you're going to shit on every thread with hundreds of comments and issue veiled threats against the community here, that's going to earn you a ban.

11
axolotl_peyotl 11 points ago +11 / -0

More than anything this place has made me hate how reddit's descent has jaded me and even changed how I approach moderating.

It's super refreshing to approve dozens of comments in a row instead of wondering if the admins will be angry that someone wrote "china virus" (yes, they literally recently removed a comment that said only that).

It brings a little joy back to using the internet again, that's for sure.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm literally just some dude and I've never been paid or encouraged once EVER to post a source or story online, or to share certain narratives. I only share what I find personally interesting and when I want to generate discussion. you can put that in your pipe and smoke it.

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

People have been throwing that steemit thread at me for at least a couple of years now.

Why are you doxxing and propagating the very obvious ramblings of someone clearly suffering from mental illness?

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think that's TMOR, that's clearly written by a straight up mentally ill person. TMOR folks are their own brand of retarded, but not on this level.

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whoever wrote that is clearly mentally ill. Why would you share something like this?

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pennsylvania election data shows that over 432,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump during the November election, data scientists say.

According to an analysis by the Data Integrity Group, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times, votes for Trump—from both Election Day and mail-in ballots—were removed from the totals in at least 15 counties.

Time-series election data shows Trump’s votes decrementing in various counties at numerous time points instead of increasing as would be expected under normal circumstances.

The group said that Election Day vote removals happened during the vote tabulation process in at least 15 counties, including Lehigh County, Chester County, Allegheny County, Armstrong County, Westmoreland County, Northhampton County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, Lackawanna County, Dauphin County, Pike County, Carbon County, Washington County, Erie County, and Luzerne County.

Meanwhile, absentee vote removals happened in Allegheny County, Chester County, and Lehigh County.

At least 432,116 votes—213,707 election day votes and 218,409 absentee votes—were removed in total.

“There were vote movements across all candidates. However, we did not see the same type of negative decrements to any of the [other] candidates that we saw with President Trump’s tallies, and they happened repeatedly with no explanation,” Lynda McLaughlin, a member of the group, told The Epoch Times.

The Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times. Pennsylvania Trump votes Pennsylvania data shows Trump’s votes decrementing at various time points in Allegheny County (L) and Chester County (R), the Data Integrity Group says. (Screenshot)

The Data Integrity Group is a group of scientists, engineers, and machine learning experts who have been working together to check whether or not there was manipulation of data in the 2020 general election.

The group’s lineup of data scientists includes Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue.

Mealey is a nine-year veteran of the U.S. Navy, where he worked as an electronic warfare technician, cryptologic technician, and Arabic linguist. He worked at the NSA as a mission manager for Levant/North Africa and later worked as a CIA contractor at the National Counter-Terrorism Center.

Lobue has 12 years of experience in data science and machine learning across financial services, telecommunications, and research consulting industries. He currently specializes in artificial intelligence applications.

Data scientists from the group have analyzed the election data for several states including Arizona and Georgia.

In their analysis of Georgia’s election data, the group said it found that more than 30,000 votes had been removed from Trump’s tally, and another 12,173 votes were switched to Biden.

The group didn’t name any state official, county official, or related voting machine manufacturers for wrongdoing.

However, the group urged the state to authorize forensic audits to uphold election integrity and said it is irresponsible to certify the results before the alleged errors and anomalies are explained.

“The bottom line is the errors were made. Data confirms these errors and it shouldn’t matter if they were machine or human, they’re still errors and deserve a second review and thorough analysis with forensic audits to find the answers,” the group said.

Pennsylvania’s electors cast their votes for Biden and Kamala Harris as president-elect and vice president-elect on Dec. 14, 2020.

State-certified results show Biden won the Keystone State by 80,555 votes. Edison Admits One Error in Vote Switching

During the vote tabulation process, the results, which are commonly known as tabulated results, are sent to the secretary of state’s office. The data is then also shared with the media via Edison Research.

Errors could be made in several steps in the election result reporting process.

Though it’s unclear what caused the errors that were flagged by the Data Integrity Group, Edison Research did admit a reporting error that happened separately.

In a widely-circulated video clip of CNN’s live election night broadcast, 19,958 votes were seen being switched from Trump to Biden in 30 seconds.

Rob Farman, executive vice president at Edison, admitted that the “switching” stemmed from a brief reporting error from Edison Research.

He told The Associated Press that a state feed from Armstrong, Pennsylvania, first showed the correct values of 24,233 votes for Trump and 4,275 for Biden, but a team member had mistakenly entered them backward—4,275 for Trump and 24,233 for Biden. Farman said the company’s quality control team discovered the error and corrected it that night.

4
axolotl_peyotl 4 points ago +4 / -0

correct, about to enact a rule against forum sliding to nuke these fucks. It's not a free speech issue, these people are here in bad faith.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›