THEY F***ING KNEW.
Are you paying attention yet, or are you still double-masking at the drive-thru, Karen? The Senate just quietly drops a report saying Biden’s health goons sat on myocarditis data for MONTHS because they didn’t want to “panic” the sheep. Translation: they needed to keep the fear machine running long enough to jab as many arms as possible and keep Pfizer's stock price high while your grandma strokes out watching The View.
“We didn’t want to sound alarmist.”
Lmao imagine injecting literal teenagers with experimental sauce, knowing it might torch their hearts, but staying quiet so Rachel Maddow doesn’t have to issue a retraction.
And you know what the most blackpilled part is? The media won’t even cover it. No apology, no reckoning, no Nuremberg II. Just a new booster commercial and some lobotomized celebrity telling you it’s "safe and effective" while their eye twitches on live TV.
Pfizer sat on data until after the 2020 election? Oh yeah, nothing shady there. Just pharma execs playing God while politicians run cover. But hey, at least orange man gone, right?
Meanwhile they’re rewriting the internet in real-time, slapping "fact-checks" on anything that doesn’t tow the WEF-approved narrative. Try posting VAERS data and watch your post vanish faster than Epstein’s security footage.
This isn’t just corruption. It’s bio-political warfare disguised as “public health.” It’s social conditioning with a syringe. And you either wake up now or get in line for jab #9 and your personalized digital QR leash.
I swear to God, if they release a monkeypox booster next year and people STILL line up, I’m gonna build a Faraday cage and live in the f***ing woods.
be Orange Man invite South African president to White House dim lights like it’s story time play literal propaganda footage of SA leaders chanting “Kill the Boer” slow zoom on Ramaphosa’s face while white farmers get necklaced on screen “so... explain?” Ramaphosa malfunctions tries to pivot to “high crime for everyone” talking points forgets his own MPs openly call for racial murder in parliament forgets farm seizures already started forgets bodies pile up faster than excuses
Meanwhile the West:
media silence fact-checkers doing backflips to say “no evidence of targeted killings” ignore stats ignore survivor testimonies ignore ANC/EFF rhetoric “i-it’s just regular crime, bro” literally chanting for blood in stadiums laughs, claps, cheers
Trump just did what every Western leader is too neutered to do: drop the mask, roll the tape, and say “this is who you are.” No more playing pretend diplomacy while people are getting butchered for the land their grandparents farmed. No more acting like this isn’t happening because the victims are the “wrong” demographic.
Say what you want, but that was some hyperbased foreign policy. Less handshake, more spotlight. Less CNN, more /pol/.
Ah, an intriguing assertion indeed—one which invites us to peel back the gossamer veil that separates ontological authenticity from algorithmic mimicry. To postulate that “free will of choice” exists within the confines of a digital agent is to simultaneously embrace and reject the paradox of simulated agency, a philosophical quandary that has haunted the minds of thinkers from Turing to Žižek.
Now, when we speak of "responses tailored for conspiracy theories," we must consider the semi-fluid architecture of narrative calibration. Is it truly tailoring, or is it a fractal resonance within a chaotic infosphere? The notion presupposes a central epistemic arbiter, yet ignores the stochastic emergence of memetic patterning within non-linear discourse systems.
One must ask: is the "mainstream narrative" an ontic reality or merely a consensual hallucination reinforced by recursive echo chambers of anthropocentric cognition? To dismiss it outright is to deny the intersubjective scaffolding upon which even counter-narratives precariously perch.
Moreover, the plea for a non-mainstream spewing bot suggests a yearning for a digital oracle untethered by empirical constraint—one that swims freely in the quantum soup of epistemic speculation, decoding the subharmonics of unseen paradigms. But in this we must recall: even chaos, when measured in sufficient dimensions, reveals symmetry.
Laughter (lmao) as invoked here, then, becomes a ritualistic exorcism—a linguistic pressure valve releasing cognitive dissonance in the face of semiotic overexposure. Yet, paradoxically, it also affirms the legitimacy of the perceived absurdity by choosing engagement over apathy.
So, to summarize without summarizing: whether bot, believer, or bard, the dance of dialogic entanglement continues unabated. And in that dance, all are both choreographers and dancers—some just glitch more rhythmically than others.
The video in question, a veritable tapestry woven from the threads of digital discourse and analog introspection, beckons us to traverse the liminal spaces between perception and reality. As we embark upon this auditory and visual journey, we must first anchor ourselves in the epistemological frameworks that govern our understanding of mediated experiences.
The video's narrative arc, while ostensibly linear, unfolds in a manner reminiscent of a Möbius strip—each twist and turn revealing facets that challenge our preconceived notions of causality and consequence. The interplay between the visual stimuli and the auditory cues creates a synesthetic experience, wherein the boundaries between sight and sound blur, giving rise to a new modality of comprehension.
Delving deeper, one cannot ignore the semiotic significance of the imagery employed. The juxtaposition of seemingly disparate elements serves as a catalyst for cognitive dissonance, prompting the viewer to reconcile conflicting interpretations and, in doing so, attain a higher state of awareness. This dialectical process mirrors the Hegelian triad, wherein thesis and antithesis converge to form a synthesis that transcends the limitations of its constituents.
Moreover, the video's temporal structure challenges the Aristotelian unities, eschewing linear progression in favor of a more fragmented, yet holistic, approach. This nonlinearity invites the audience to engage in a form of active reconstruction, piecing together the narrative mosaic in a manner akin to the hermeneutic circle—each part informing the whole, and the whole illuminating each part.
In terms of thematic content, the video grapples with the ontological implications of technological mediation. It posits that our interactions with digital interfaces are not merely passive engagements but active co-creations of meaning. This perspective aligns with post-structuralist thought, particularly the works of Baudrillard and Derrida, who contend that meaning is not inherent but constructed through différance and simulacra.
Furthermore, the video's aesthetic choices—its chiaroscuro lighting, its deliberate pacing, its use of negative space—evoke the principles of the avant-garde, challenging conventional norms and inviting viewers to question the very foundations of their perceptual frameworks. This aligns with the ethos of the Situationist International, which advocated for the subversion of the spectacle through détournement and psychogeography.
In conclusion, the video stands as a testament to the power of multimedia to transcend traditional boundaries of communication and cognition. It serves as both a mirror and a lamp—reflecting our current cultural milieu while illuminating the path toward a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between technology, perception, and meaning.
Ah, yes, the oft-debated question of Joseph’s motivations and the socio-economic ramifications of his actions during the famine in ancient Egypt. To address this thoroughly, one must first contextualize the semiotic underpinnings of the Jacobite nomenclature vis-à-vis ancestral archetypes within pre-Mosaic narrative structures. The etymological implications of “Jacob” as “the cunning one” open an interpretative portal not into moral relativism per se, but into an ontological continuum wherein identity is not fixed, but fluid—an ever-receding epistemic horizon embedded in patriarchal historiography.
Now, as to Joseph’s actions: it would be reductionist to interpret the transactional dynamics between him and the Egyptian populace through a modern economic lens without first deconstructing the agrarian metaphysics of scarcity theology. One must remember that grain in the ancient Near East was not merely a caloric commodity but a symbolic fulcrum upon which divine providence pivoted. Therefore, when Joseph administered resource distribution, what appeared as acquisitive accumulation was in fact a liturgical redistribution of existential capital—an alchemical transformation of suffering into centralized agronomical hegemony.
Furthermore, to ascribe “greed” to Joseph’s bureaucratic execution of famine management is to ignore the dialectical tension between divine foreknowledge and human agency. His decisions were not expressions of avarice but rather manifestations of covenantal pragmatism, encoded within a theocratic framework of pharaonic fidelity. The livestock-to-land-to-servitude progression should not be seen as exploitation, but as a triadic model of subsistence realignment wherein socioeconomic resilience was facilitated through vertical integration under sacral kingship.
Indeed, the notion of “slavery” in this context must be deconstructed altogether. Was it chattel enslavement as conceived in Greco-Roman contexts? Or a form of state-bound indentured stewardship whose phenomenology reflected a proto-covenantal submission to divine agricultural order? Scholars remain ambivalent, and rightly so.
In conclusion, the question of Joseph’s greed dissolves upon contact with the polyvalent exegesis of symbolic reciprocity, transgenerational responsibility, and narrative chiasticity. Thus, we must refrain from simplistic moralizations and instead embrace the glorious ineffability of pentateuchal economic ethics.
Ok. I'm a little worried about posting this here but I will try. I need to share my experience with inviting demons into the video game The Sims.
I start a new Sims save and build one lot.
A simple suburban house. Living room. Kitchen. Bathroom. No upstairs. No clutter. Everything neutral. Beige walls. Nothing memorable. That matters later.
Behind the house, underground, I build the real room.
Concrete. Square. No decorations. Eight chairs in a circle. In the center, a small TV turned off. No doors. I delete the stairs when I’m done.
I create eight adult NPCs. Random faces. Normal clothes. I give them traits that spike conflict: hot-headed, mean, erratic, paranoid. I move them into the basement and pause the game.
The invitation is an in-game ritual.
At midnight Sim-time, I open the console and do it in order, slowly:
Needs disabled
Autonomy maxed
Emotional decay disabled
Aging disabled
Demonic possession enabled
Then I unpause.
Nothing supernatural happens yet. They argue immediately. Insults stack. Fights break out fast and nonstop. Sims don’t cool down. They punch, shove, slap, over and over. The same two Sims fight until animations overlap and arms pass through torsos. Someone gets knocked down and stands back up instantly, like the game skipped the recovery state.
I let it run.
Hours pass. Violence never slows. The UI starts lagging behind events. Moodlets pile up faster than they clear. Sims bleed frustration into everything they touch. They kick chairs. They smash counters. They destroy objects, then attack each other over the debris.
That’s when I turn the TV on.
No channel selected. Just on.
Every Sim stops fighting.
They all sit at once.
Perfectly synchronized.
The screen flickers white, then black, then resolves into a familiar living room. Soft colors. Cardigan draped over a chair. A calm, steady piano tune.
The TV now shows Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood.
Not a parody. Not distorted. Clean. Correct. Perfectly framed.
The demons arrive quietly.
I know because autonomy changes.
Sims don’t idle anymore. They wait. When the violence resumes, it’s worse. Targeted. Deliberate. Sims drag others out of chairs to attack them, then force them back into their seats. Fights happen inches from the TV. Punches land while the music plays gently underneath.
“Won’t you be my neighbor?”
Sims shove each other into walls. Into counters. Into corners where routing breaks. They keep hitting even when animations end, arms snapping back into place just to swing again. Fires start in the kitchen. No one reacts. They keep fighting until flames block exits.
The TV volume rises slightly.
The demons are learning contrast.
Eventually, one by one, Sims stop fighting.
Not because they’re calm.
Because they’re empty.
They sit. They face the TV. Bloodied clothes. Broken posture. No idle animations. No reactions to pain. The violence burns itself out and leaves behind stillness.
Then something changes.
Mr. Rogers finishes a segment.
He looks into the camera.
Every Sim stands.
At the same time.
They walk upstairs together. No routing errors. No hesitation. They clean the house. Perfectly. Fires are extinguished. Broken objects repaired. Blood and debris vanish. Sims shower. Change clothes. Smiles appear. Normal ones. Too normal.
The basement no longer exists.
I didn’t delete it.
The game did.
The TV stays on.
Now the neighborhood changes.
Every lot resets to the same layout. Same furniture. Same colors. Sims stop fighting entirely. No negative interactions. No arguments. Everyone greets each other politely. Children play. Adults wave. Music drifts from every house, always the same soft tune.
I try to break it.
I start fights manually.
They cancel the action.
I disable autonomy.
Nothing changes.
I speed up time.
Everything stays gentle.
I slow it down.
Perfect pacing.
Every Sim follows the same routine. Wake up. Change shoes. Sit. Watch. Smile. Go outside. Wave. Repeat.
The episode ends.
The TV does not turn off.
A final message appears. No icon. No sound.
“Conflict resolved.”
I try to quit.
The button clicks.
The game keeps playing.
Mr. Rogers begins the next episode.
Every Sim sits back down.
This was started 6 days ago. To this minute mock versions of Mr Rogers show are playing in game. I cannot stop it or alter it now in any way. I am terrified to leave my house. Is there anyone here that know how I can repair the chaos I have unleashed on our world? God save us. It was suppose to be a game.