This proves how indoctrinated you are, everything you see in your telescope appears as a luminary of relativety local distance. Keep believing nasa you detestable retard.
Have fun looking at all the fake shit nasa shows you... cunt.
The nearest star is 4.37 light-years away from what they tell us. The sun is 8 light minute away. I'm sure you understand that objects appear to shrink as the further they are away. The sun looks small enough to hold in your fingers from 8 light minutes of distance; I don't believe that you would be able to see the closest star from 4.37 light years away due to how much it would shrink. I'm too lazy to do the math on how much further that is than the sun, but it's a ridiculous multitude.
Flat earth has no definite answer on how far away the sun and moon are, or even what they physically are. I am fine with this uncertainty because it's not necessary to have a complete model to debunk the hyliocentic model (which is also always changing and incomplete). But the sun and moon are distant enough that I don't think a car would make much of a difference, in addition to considering the speed they move over earth.
Note the speed of the sun is the same in both models at about 1037 mph, just one says its earth rotation and the other says the sun is moving.
What the fuck man, they must be so desensitized from all that hell. Poor kids, I hope they can somehow turn out normal if that's even possible. It pisses me off how many normies can't get it through their lobotomized fluoridated brains that this is happening everywhere.
I was talking about the stars of the constellations in relation to how they are spaced amongst eachother. Their spacing appears to be the same because the ancients depicted them exactly as they are today. Even if you want to argue they this spacing has altered slightly in thousands of years this seems completely implausible considering the universe is expanding at incomprehensible speeds according to the big bang theory. And we have no way of going back in time to check these measurements.
I am speaking out the scope of my research with this next speculation, but it is my understanding that we are currently transitioning from the age of Pisces to the age of Aquarius. Each of these ages last about 2156 years, both heliocentric and flat earth models agree on this. Is it possible the zodiac constellations shift slowly to different months through the ages? Just speculation, but I have not seen convincing evidence the stars shift in their spacing relative to eachother over any period of time.
The constilations are exactly the same as thousands of years ago, this is why the great pyramids still perfectly represent onions belt after at least 5000 years. With the motions and speeds I outlined our earth allegedly experiencing in the heliocentric model I dont think the stars would stay the same in 1 year let alone thousands. One reason I think they destroyed the Georgia guidstones is it had a hole that points directly towards Polaris at all times for 50 years, and this was proving our stars do not change.
I can show the same result with 2 beer bottles on a flat ground and a light bulb that moves overhead. This effect also works on a flat earth and a small local sun that moves.
Wow ya, that's horrible. I think violence will continue to intensify
The sun and moon are small and local and just like an airplane they eventually vanish at the horizon (though they can be seen at a far greater distance than a plane). The Firmament also has an effect on their light distribution. Cultures around the world all seemed to have a version of this model, and it was even taught in USA until the cabal brainwashed everyone in the early 1900s. NASAs fake moonlandings and other works sealed the deal. It's all a plot to hide our creator and get people to become atheist and believe the big bang religion and evolution. If people knew the truth of our cosmology and creation, authorities world wide would be discredited overnight, and aethism would be impossible. But if you want to believe NASAs lies and that we live on a sphere spinning at over 1000mph, hurtling around the sun 66,616mph, the sun going around the galaxy at 514,000mph, the milky way hurtling at unimaginable speeds through the universe, yet we can't experience any of that motion and the stars never change; then go ahead and buy it. You don't have to believe flat earth is correct, but at least try to find the lies about our cosmology.
There was a conservative kid who got run over by a pscho libtard the other day, that was pretty sudden
Another obvious answer to another retarded statement. Objects in the sky, particularly the more directly overhead they are, have less atmosphere to be viewed through, and the density of air decreases with altitude. This is why the sun and moon are brightest when directly overhead, and lessen the closer they get to the horizon because they have far more atmosphere to penetrate. Humans already can't breath at 30,000 feet cause the air is so thin, and you are talking about the moon being 238k miles away as if that distance proves your point. The lower your altitude and the lower to the horizon you look, the more atmospheric density you have to obscure your vision. Globe earth and flat earth both claim this phenomenon to be true.
If that's true then how come you can't see across the street sometimes when it's foggy? The atmosphere is not completely transparent even I'm the most ideal conditions, so we can't see through it indefinitely. This is so obvious I can't believe you got done typing that comment without thinking twice. Good job retard
It could be because the heliocentric accounting of time only approximates the true flat earth accounting of time that we experience in reality. Therefore it needs constant correction. But how can we possibly be sure of what corrections they make and how often? Digital clocks can all be updated via internet automatically, and even the most accurate analog clocks are not perfect.
One of the things I find most fascinating about flat earth is that if true, then our creator set the sun, moon and stars to rotate around our plane at different rates like a big celestial clock. It does not appear to be the messy explosion the big bang suggests.
What do you think of the moon landings?
Oh you didn't mean seasonal lengthening of days, my bad. You meant days lengthening to 20 hours, 22 hours, 24 hours etc... throughout earth's history.
Well I suppose it's useless asking a flat earther because we don't believe anything mainstream science says about the age or creation of the universe, or the big bang religion. For instance they say our stars shift slowly throughout eons. Yet the Georgia guidestones which were just destroyed had a hole that constantly pointed at Polaris for 50 years. I don't believe this is possible considering the speed/distance we are hurting around the sun, and the sun is hurtling around the milky way, and the milky way is hurtling through the universe. I get they are far away, but this is still ridiculous. Why do you think the ancients depicted constellations exactly the same for thousands of years? I think the length of days changing is most likely another lie.
I'll use the term hemisphere for simplicity even though I don't believe we are on a sphere. The northern hemisphere being the part inner part of our plane surrounding the north pole, and the southern hemisphere being the outer part of our plane beyond the equator. During the northern hemisphere summer the sun is circling between the equator and the tropic of cancer. This lengthens our days in the northern hemisphere as the sun casts its light on this part of the plane for more hours of the day. As the sun moves between the equator and the tropic of Capricorn, the southern hemisphere will experience more sun/day light and the northern days will shorten.
Honestly you probably won't be able to take a look at any of this unless you first come to find that almost everything organizations like nasa tell us about space is fake. I first found out the moonlandings were complete hoaxes from a Hollywood studio. Then I found the ISS was completely fake. Then I found all satellites and images/video of space was fake including our blue spherical earth. And at that point I realized what we are told about cosmology is all lies. I would investigate these things first before flat earth if I were you, because you can't skip steps when going up the staircase of disbelief, it's just too much of a leap.
There is a link that gives a visual explanation of the path of the sun through the year. Just like on the globe model it travels between the tropics of cancer and Capricorn through the year, only on FE the sun is small and near, and it travels in expanding and contracting circles throughout the year. Side note, the book of Enoch seems to uncannily describe the path of the sun in FE terms. Not all FE people believe their is a domed firmament above us, but I do because it further explains the distribution of daylight across earth.
Also note that daylight and sunlight are two different things. I may see daylight even if the sun is beyond my horizon. The sun seems to have an EMF output that floresces the sky, and affects the light/phases of the moon (the moon is its own light, not a reflector).
We can't see the sun for an unlimited distance across flat earth for 2 main reasons. First, you can't even see across the street if it's foggy enough. Our air is not completely transparent and you may see far but you cannot see forever. 2nd is perspective, as objects go away from us they eventually vanish into a horizon at our eye level, even if we should have line of sight with the object. If a plane flies over your head at a constant 30k feet altitude, it will appear to decend into the horizon even though it is maintaing altitude.
PS, do you think that picture of earth is real?
This response is the perfect example of a lifetime of programming. Flat earthers on the other hand will discuss their stance in depth because they took the time to overcome that programming.
Honestly I sympathize with you because I suffered the same cognitive dissonance, but trump is either a fool or a murdering psychopath for pushing the gene therapy shots. He's not going to rescue anyone from what is coming. I have a hard time letting go of the maga spirit he promoted though.
Precisely, I dont see how anyone could see those two as a better alternative to trump. Frankly I think we need a pinochet or gaddafi.
I feel like the moonlanding hoaxes are a big turning point. It's a good conspiracy to show them because the evidence is undeniable unless you are hopelessly brainwashed. And the implications of such are world view shattering. It means you have to question your knowledge of space and cosmology from the ground up. How much math and science is horseshit? How psychopathic is our government to keep the hoax alive for 50 years? What else have they lied about? Basically if you accept this hoax you will snap your mind out of the matrix and you will find even greater truths.
Whats with these predictions?
Well if anyone can cross Antarctica, document it so we can see if you reach the other side as globe earth portrays, if you hit the firmament, or if it just keeps going indefinitely. Good luck getting the approval from the UN, funding, and equipment to do it.
I mean if you couldnt tell it was fake right away at 1:40 sec in when it starts getting all animated it looks fake as hell.
Honestly this scene from star trek with planet vulcan looks more real. https://youtu.be/dnpZeA1s3KY
Now I'm guessing these space agencies and meteorogical agencies have some sort of system in place using various ground and sea based weather stations to help them come up with these animations. You wouldn't need satellites to see how atmospheric pressure was changing around the world for instance, you just need a network.
However we do have thousands of balloon satellites that can stay aloft for 2 years. Nasa and friends launch these things constantly. I imagine they have all kinds of uses including weather observation.
Not trying to take a piss, just honestly what I think.
Great argument you absolute retard