To get an idea of what our earth looks like search 'gleason 1892 map'. The north pole is actually the center of our earth, and there is no south pole. Antarctica is an encircling landmass, some refer to it as the ice wall. We can't say for sure what lies beyond Antarctica because it's impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty. Planes will be shot down, and vessels attacked who even get too close to Antarctica without approval from the UN. All research and military stations wouldn't allow you to leave and explore either. It's also by far the harshest climate in the world. There could be more land beyond Antarctica for all I know. Biblical cosmology suggests that is where the firmament is mounted. The Firmament is a solid dome over earth.
Some of the best evidence debunking this is how the stars spin in opposite directions depending on whether or not you are near the North Pole or the South Pole.
They spin in opposite directions because we are on opposite sides of a spinning globe.
Even though Dave seems like a pretentious prick, I do think he comes up with great counter-arguments that prove that Flat Earth theory can't stand up to rigorous debate 10 Challenges For Flat Earthershttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQl8h7Aa75s
I watch the 10 challenges thing. I feel like I can address all his points with the caveat there are somethings that flat earthers can only speculate on not prove. We're there any of those 10 you found especially compelling?
Why does the sun set behind the horizon if the flat earth model shows it just moves around the sky and should just become more distant as it moves around flat earth, not set over the horizon.
So is there an edge and what happens past it?
To get an idea of what our earth looks like search 'gleason 1892 map'. The north pole is actually the center of our earth, and there is no south pole. Antarctica is an encircling landmass, some refer to it as the ice wall. We can't say for sure what lies beyond Antarctica because it's impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty. Planes will be shot down, and vessels attacked who even get too close to Antarctica without approval from the UN. All research and military stations wouldn't allow you to leave and explore either. It's also by far the harshest climate in the world. There could be more land beyond Antarctica for all I know. Biblical cosmology suggests that is where the firmament is mounted. The Firmament is a solid dome over earth.
Some of the best evidence debunking this is how the stars spin in opposite directions depending on whether or not you are near the North Pole or the South Pole.
They spin in opposite directions because we are on opposite sides of a spinning globe.
Even though Dave seems like a pretentious prick, I do think he comes up with great counter-arguments that prove that Flat Earth theory can't stand up to rigorous debate 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQl8h7Aa75s
I watch the 10 challenges thing. I feel like I can address all his points with the caveat there are somethings that flat earthers can only speculate on not prove. We're there any of those 10 you found especially compelling?
The sunset argument.
Why does the sun set behind the horizon if the flat earth model shows it just moves around the sky and should just become more distant as it moves around flat earth, not set over the horizon.