Are you admitting it's wrong to reconquer land just because your ancestors used to live there?
At least you admitted its a prison
I said no such thing.
You are have no human right to cross a border into someone else's country where you are not wanted.
It's obvious to the rest of the world they can't leave, because the rest of the world also refuses to let them into their countries.
So you defend the genocide Israel is committing against Palestinians? The 17,000 dead women and children?
Civilian casualties does not automatically make a conflict a genocide.
The Palestinians have been crying genocide for 80 fucking years, meanwhile their population has exploded to the millions.
Why yes I can, Pelican Bay in California
Pelican Bay the bay has a hotel..... Pelican Bay the prison has razor wire and cellblocks.
If I stole your house with tanks and I made you live in a shed in the backyard while telling you if you attempt to leave I would shoot you, what would you call it? It's a prison, unequivocally.
What if I never actually lived there in my life, and it was "stolen" in a war long before I was born?
How many of those fighting aged males ever actually lived on land that Israel now owns? None of them.
Palestinians want to fight for land their great great grandpa once owned?
Fine... But then they aren't fighting a war against an oppressor at that point. They are fighting a war of reconquest, and the other side has every right to fight back just as violently.
Do you know of any prison where the prisoners have their own military and control tunnels into and out of said prison? Can you name any other prison containing a beach front hotel?
They're not in a prison, they're just shitty fucking neighbors and so they aren't allowed on the other side of the fence.
So you agree they are shooting at them then?
Would you tolerate anyone shooting at your house?
to justify taking their front yard piecemeal over 75 years while maintaining a perimeter that ensured they couldn't leave
That's what I'm saying... Israel hasn't handled it right.... If they're shooting at your house you don't take their yard piecemeal over 75 years. You take it all at once and kick them the fuck outta there for good.
He's right you know.... October 7th would've never happened if Israel took the right actions a lot sooner.
If you lived in a world where there was no police force to call, and your neighbor everyday kept shooting bullets at your house, because he thinks it's really his house since his great grandpa lived there, you'd take action.
And the action you'd take would not be to build a giant bullet proof iron dome around your house that stops the bullets from killing your family, and then tolerate the shots for 20 years.
Your action would be to go over there armed to the teeth, put a bullet in the father's head, tell the rest of his family to hit the road and never come back unless they want to be next, and then set his house on fire.
Sounds like you don't even know what side of the argument you're on, since you were the saying you like the US military. lol.
So then the US federal government is officially anarchistic in nature.
Because all the politicians and bureaucrats voluntarily chose to work in the government.
Now that we settled that, you can shut up about anarchy, because you're already living it..... and it turns out it leads to massive government control.
So if me and 50 of my friends voluntarily get together, and make up a bunch of rules that you and your family have to follow, or else we shoot you....
Is that anarchy?
Idiot.... It doesn't matter if the soldiers choose to join or not...
The fact that they get together, follow the orders of a central authority, and enforce rules on everyone whether they agreed to those rules or not, is the OPPOSITE OF ANARCHY.
By your retreaded ass logic the USSR was an anarchist state because Joseph Stalin got to choose whether or not he participated in it, and to what degree.
This is what happens when you say something stupid but your ego is too big to just walk it back....
Now you're sitting here twisting yourself into circles trying to explain how the worlds most powerful military, controlled by the worlds largest government, is somehow an example of anarchy.
Bro.... Just walk it back...
how the fuck is this anarchy, you fucking idiot?
they are literally doing the bidding of the largest government in the world.
It's a volunteer military, retard. No one can make you join the military (not that you could get in,
and then this volunteer military can and has been used to tell civilians they have to stay in their homes or else face punishment.
is that your idea of anarchy? a central government force telling everyone when they can leave their house? fucking idiot.
it's ran by a centralized government with a single person as the commander in chief. there are a multitude of laws and punishments for breaking these laws within the military, as well as the fact that the military is used to enforce civilian laws when necessary.
The US military is the opposite of anarchy moron...
And if you really think it's not then you should shut the fuck up because you're already living in the anarchist system you want. which means you don't have to tell any of us about your stupid ideas, because you're already living them out.
You tired to use the US military as an example of why anarchy can work...
Why don't you look up who the 1st president of the United States was, and what his job was right before he was president.
You're trying to use the revolutionary war as an example of why your dumb fantasy system can work, when in reality the revolutionary war lead to the very government want dissolved so badly.
Again.... Explain to me how anarchy prevents someone from just taking over and ending the anarchy...
You mean the US military that's controlled by a central authority, definitely has a hierarchy, and definitely assumed governance of the country after defeating the other military power trying to rule it?
🤣
So let me get this straight.... You think a bunch of unconnected individuals are going to spontaneously create a military force, with no hierarchy or structure, and they are going to effectively combat a well organized force with a central authority?
And after they win this battle, they will just magically dissipate, still with no leadership, and no desire to take power themselves?
Please tell me if I'm understanding your idea correctly...
We already live in an anarchist system called planet earth, and it's proven that it inevitably leads to the rise of governments in all cases.
The point of a dictatorship is you can not merely "choose" to stop it. It's implemented by force.
In a system where there exists no state force, what prevents the next most powerful force from establishing their own state?
My big question about anarchy is who enforces it and stops the strongest warlord from just establishing their own dictatorship?
Wikipedia says the Kazar hypothesis was abandoned after being debunked by the ability to study dna.
Can you tell me why satisfying some dudes assumptions is a scientific requirement at all?
Nobody has ever fully isolated any poison according to my postulates.
1.) The poison must be broken down into its constituent atoms.
2.) The atoms must be broken down into their constituent subatomic particles.
3.) The subatomic particles must be injected into a healthy animal and cause disease.
Go on smart guy. Find an example of anyone doing that. Bet you can't.
Shove your bible verses up your ass where they belong.
Answer the question... Is it wrong to reconquer land just because your ancestors lived there or not?