A Case for Anarchism
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Idiot.... It doesn't matter if the soldiers choose to join or not...
The fact that they get together, follow the orders of a central authority, and enforce rules on everyone whether they agreed to those rules or not, is the OPPOSITE OF ANARCHY.
By your retreaded ass logic the USSR was an anarchist state because Joseph Stalin got to choose whether or not he participated in it, and to what degree.
Your immediate contradiction reflects a cognitive deficit I will no longer engage with, learn something while the internet still exists. Something other than recycling stupidity out of your face holes.
So if me and 50 of my friends voluntarily get together, and make up a bunch of rules that you and your family have to follow, or else we shoot you....
Is that anarchy?
The fact your group, which consists of individuals, voluntarily formed without a government or authority coercing you to do so would make your group anarchistic in nature. What you do after that has absolutely nothing to do with the organizational principles or lack thereof of the group. I think you are conflating the idea of Anarchism with morality or ethical behavior and I don't know why.
So then the US federal government is officially anarchistic in nature.
Because all the politicians and bureaucrats voluntarily chose to work in the government.
Now that we settled that, you can shut up about anarchy, because you're already living it..... and it turns out it leads to massive government control.