I get Shapiro, but what did Crowder say?
My impression was that they don't even get along. Wasn't there a big blowup between Crowder's organization and Daily Wire?
Too bad Biden and Trudeau shut down a pipeline project from Canada (potentially the world's second biggest oil producer) to US refineries, that might have come in handy right around now.
Sort of like how Canada supplying natural gas to Europe when the war with Russia started would have alleviated things, but Trudeau said "nah".
Almost as though there are people in our own governments working against our national interests...
This is how Israel "minimizes civilian casualties", eh Ben?
The last ones definitely were, the giant, plumed, explosions striking from above? Looked pretty real to me.
Kinda makes me wonder why Hamas would even plan an attack like this when they know what the consequences will be...
F@+#ing kids and their f@+#ing slime!
Not to suggest anything, but if the US glasses Israel, I can't think of anyone who'd care to retaliate.
Just sayin'...
That's assuming their goal in the West is to take over. It isn't. Their goal in the West is to burn it to the ground.
Jews are not conquerors, they're subversives. They aren't good at building or overseeing complex systems, which is why they try so hard to reduce the size of the population; it simplifies things. Jews invented Communism as a system of government, not because it puts them in charge, but because it makes everyone slaves to a concentrated central authority which is trivial for them to subvert if necessary. It usually isn't because it's enough for them to have the people enslaved, generally, until they're needed.
The problem with the West is decentralized governments that are dependent on the good faith contribution of millions of individual people, rather than a centralized bureaucracy. This makes them harder (though not impossible) to subvert.
For example, Jews were able to control Soviet Russia merely by infiltrating the secret police and the ideological wing of the Communist party. In the US, they've had to infiltrate both political parties, Hollywood, news media, the music industry, unions, and even had to create a special financial institution (the Federal Reserve) because they couldn't control all the little banks without destroying them through currency manipulation.
Fillibg us with brown folk who hate Jews doesn't hurt Jews, because they don't live here. They can, at a moments notice, flee to their ethnostate if ever there is a popular revolution against them. Largely, though, they don't even have to because they can point at these people, living beside us, and say "Look. Those are the immigrants you need to get. It's clear to all that there are too many people here who hate this country, why not attack my enemies that I've imported?", thus creating a fight between their two foes while they, as always, play the victim.
Well, if Palestinian tactics are similar to what we just saw (firing rockets at random civilians instead of targetting military infrastructure), this isn't surprising.
Don't see your point here?
First off, there a several Arab-Israeli treaties listed so, no, Palestine is obviously not just a political attempt to delegitimize Israel if most of the major political players in the region officially recognize it.
In fact, the only group that seems to be fighting the state of Israel is the Palestinians. Why might that be? Well:
There are also various economic and political restrictions placed on Palestinian people, activities, and institutions which have had a detrimental effect on the Palestinian economy and quality of life.[22] Israel has said repeatedly that these restrictions are necessary due to security concerns, and in order to counteract ongoing efforts which promote terrorism which incite opposition to Israel's existence and rights as a country.
[Emphasis added]
You're literally just spouting Israeli talking points, lol.
I appreciate that you're smart enough to realize that openly shilling for Israel will get you mocked here so you've instead gone with "But Palestinians are bad, too". Very clever.
What's not so clever is creating an account hours after the widely noted Isreali traffic-drop (and subsequent shill-silence).
How's the weather in Tel Aviv, rabbi? Heard you've had some storms...
They subverted the government of the place they lived to literally crucify their political enemies.
Classic
Maybe Europe should send all the arabs they already have back to Israel, solve two problems at once?
Extremely important for serious conspiracy theorists: always question your sources, especially when they're saying what you want to hear.
James Lindsay speaks extensively on the Hegelian Dialectic; which is just this.
Polarize people as far as they'll go, on any issue, then set them against each other. If both see the other side as completely wrong, you can move the narrative in a completely unrelated direction as a "compromise" or "resolution" of the problem.
The nice thing about logic is that it doesn't care about your biases, if you can show something to be internally inconsistent, then it's wrong.
I went through most of the Lockdowns not knowing what was actually happening, but knowing which narratives were demonstrable lies. You don't necessarily need real world data to show this, just use the data a person is using to justify their position to disprove them.
So I knew Covid wasn't particularily deadly, it didn't kill indiscriminately, the vax was never safe or effective, and lockdowns were never about health. I didn't need to prove the opposite (which we couldn't until after the fact) to know that what we were told was a lie.
Another easy one is: of someone tells you something is definitely true, but doesn't provide evidence, it probably isn't.
To this day, Youtube puts links on all videos discussion Covid that purport to show the "real" facts, but which merely lead to a government site with broad, unfalsifiable, statements, not studies or data. I assume, without further evidence, that anything they're trying to say is a lie.
Once you eliminate the possibilities, whatever remains, no matter how unlikely, must be the truth.
Further:
Most members of freecanada believe that no graves were ever found. That is simply not true...
This article says nothing about how the graves were found or what evidence suggests they were related to residential schools. The entire crux of these claims of "mass graves" is that they found bodies using ground penetrating radar (which is extremely fallible), but have yet to physically confirm a single body.
These churches are hundreds of years old, in some cases. Is it not reasonable to expect there to be many graves in their cemetaries whose tombstones were removed or were made of wood? What links these graves, if they are actually real, to Residential Schools?
I have no problem beleiving that the federal government and these churches perpetrated heinous abuses, up to and including hiding deaths, but I'm not going to go out and burn a church down without seeing evidence (especially when groups making these claims are also asking for millions of dollars).
I wouldn't argue that there were no abuses, or even that the government didn't attempt at least cultural genocide (by their own admission).
However, the mass grave claims are both unfounded and unnecessary.
As to the government telling the truth; they're the ones pushing the mass grave hysteria. As the self-proclaimed moral arbiters of Canada, they are strengthened by any group feeling aggreived against the others. Right now, parental rights rallies are uniting First Nations and Catholics against the government; of course they're trying to drive a wedge between the two. They want everyone fighting each other, instead of fighting them.
Definitely not the first, probably not the second.
Did you know Poland sent a team of Cosmonauts to the Sun once...AT NIGHT?
Big moon doesn't want you to know, lol.
"Everyone's a Sheep But Me and Other Fairly Stupid Tales" by OP.
Can't wait for you to do FE.
Sounds like you could use some Dostoyevski.
Sorry, you're going blind and you're using your remaining time to argue on the internet?
Wow...
He isn't even blaming; he just says that he's an embarassment and changes the subject to muh ebil Russians.
Sounds retarded on the face of it.
There no utility in fertilizing with babies or feeding them to pigs.
One, corpses don't make good fertilizer and people only ever use them (animals) because it's cheaper than paying someone to take it away. You still have to chop it up as well and it attracts scavengers to your farm.
Two, pigs eat anything, that's the point. You don't need to feed them a baby, they'll literally eat shit.
The only reason people might do this is if someone paid them to take the baby but, if there were no records, why wouldn't unwanted children just be left in the woods to be eaten by the abundant wolves of medieval France?
So, where did they come from I wonder?
We know that the vaxxes can shed spike proteins, is it not possible that these vaccines were shedding SV40?
The lack of link between those with polio vaccines and cancer rates is telling, although I question whether they took into account those who received the contaminated vaccines versus those who got clean shots. If the former group is much smaller than the larger group, the difference in cancer rates could be statistically insignificant on the whole, but significant specifically for this with SV40 in their shots.