This really isn't complicated:

Anti-natalist globalists (((we all know who they are))) spent 50 years churning out propaganda telling us to stop having kids; that the Earth is "dying" because overpopulation, that women should work through their fertile years, that hoarding money for retirement is better than investing in the next generation, etc.

When White countries succumb and birthrates crater, the very same people tell us that we have to import infinite Browns to prevent "population collapse". The people responsible for our education system tell us that our own people can't compete with Indians.

Then the (((globalists))) can implement any draconian law or policy they like and all the Whites will be too busy fighting Browns to stop them (how many more people would be focussing on stopping digital ID if we didn't have to seriously argue whether democracies can survive infinite immigration from cointries hostile to our way of life?). Browns won't ever fight because they can't imagine how they would feel not having eaten breakfast, let alone five minutes into the future. They don't understand how we acheived and maintain our prosperity and they will drag the entire system down in their attempt to enrich themselves in the short term, like a panicky drowner.

The (((Globalists))) think they can reduce the world's population to a few hundred million serfs and maintain their standard of living. Whether they have some plan I'm not aware of or they actually think race is separate from IQ, they think they can replace Whites with Brownoid and still have space ship and private jets. More likely, they'll get dysentary.

Anti-natalism leads to civilizational collapse, for everyone, period (and hey, I guess it's more "equitable" for Browns if we're all living in mud huts eating our elderly, but I'd still prefer not to). It is evil, as Imp full well knows, being a Jew. I just want to make sure everyone is totally clear on what she's advocating, seeing as how she's usually barely coherent.