0
Trumpvvon556 0 points ago +2 / -2

this is my last post about feminism because I dont really care to continue.

As a woman that filed for divorce because I married too young,

you werent too young, you were too naive and valued nothing about your marriage. it was meaningless to you, you didnt believe it had any value, and as I said, the state ensured you were protected and incentivized for divorcing, not for staying in your marriage.... which im sure you would have tried harder if there wasnt that state sponsored bail out. Im not saying men are blameless either, but you did initiate, assuming you did a cost benefit analysis, and determined divorce was the better deal, or at least wouldnt leave you stranded. And you never stated why you divorced your husband [but I can guess: every woman will claim their ex was an abusive jerk and the women could have done nothing differently themselves].

 

I learned the term starter marriage in therapy.

and that is the problem that there is a benevolent term for it

 

Femism with all its baggage is still the word for not being a damsel in distress.

[rhetorical] how is projecting your lack of trust in every man, keeping one foot out the door and keeping your finances separate because of it not a damsel in distress? its constant distress.

Feminism teaches impressionable women that they were slaves to their husbands for for all of history for whatever unfathomable reasons I dont understand. Their husbands are literally subsidizing their lifestyle, mothers arent out in the street. They state that no women worked before the 60s or 90s or whatever wave of feminism would have you believe. And it teaches them that their career is the most important thing in their lives, which is sad because not even men try to sell that kind of BS to other men, but feminist women eat it up. Its called liberating and empowering.

Im sorry you have been hoodwinked by marxist propaganda and I hope you snap out of it and dont become one of those barren 40 year old women who is bitter about everything.

2
Trumpvvon556 2 points ago +3 / -1

1960s feminism destroyed women, and relationships [coupled with birth control and abortion, but thats another story] and since their happiness has been measured, women have been less happy every year since feminism.

Feminism also has its roots in marxism. And the founding 2nd wave feminist agreed to feminist bible by Simone De Beauvoir, she has stated "women should not have the choice between raising children or working because they will take raising children every time."

All feminism did was pit women against men, who didnt want the fight so they withdrew, while getting women into the work force under the guise of liberation.... because working for a company that doesnt give a shit about you and would fire you in the morning for whatever reason and put out a "help wanted" sign that afternoon is liberating but being married to a man whom you willingly chose who willingly takes care of your everything is slavery. It also depressed wages so now in the west, unless the father makes really good money, both parents have to work and their children be raised by the state.... pure marxism.

Additionally, feminism has drilled into western women such a distrust of men that they structure their lives with one foot financially out the door. Distrust is hardly the basis for a stable family, and its the children that suffer, who witness their parents not trusting each other and the generational cycle starts all over again.

PS: 80% of divorces in the US are initiated by women, which says something considering there are no penalties, only incentives..... which LBJ used to break up black families [75% single mothers], and extrapolated to all families now.

1
Trumpvvon556 1 point ago +2 / -1

i meant after 1999. Jurassic Park was 1993.

EDIT: Even Jurassic Park had a feminist moment in it, when Dr Grand, Malcom and Sattler were talking about: God creating dinosaurs, destroying dinosaurs, creating man, man creating dinosaurs, dinosaurs destroy man, women inherit the earth.

Cringe

1
Trumpvvon556 1 point ago +2 / -1

i dont really pay attention to comic universes, i never got into them as a kid. But they should die in cinema. I know they are big money makers and what not since the whole Avengers series came about, but they are just awful. Who wants to watch a movie that has a 40 minute CGI fight scene where the good guys win every time, for however many Avengers movies there are.... 11? Some have two 40 minute fight scenes.

1
Trumpvvon556 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Chinese market is an issue in itself. I'm not sure if you're aware, but most of the time the Chinese version is completely different than ours. Especially when lgb is involved. China even made femboys illegal. China is not having the woke agenda, and they're such a money maker that studios bend over backwards to meet their standards.

you see this all the time in western cinema.

LGBT characters, or characters that the woke Pedowood wants to promote [black] are made ancillary characters in their big budget movies. Those characters have no purpose to advance the plot in a movie and can easily be deleted in the Chinese version without a continuity issue.

You saw this very prominently in the new Star Wars movies, John Boyega or whatever his name is, black stormtrooper guy, played absolutely zero part in advancing the plot of the movies. He wasnt even allowed to die a heros death: sacrifice himself to save others, by flying that rat-trap skiff thing into the cannon charging to break the door at the Rebels last stand base. He literally had no point in the movies.

3
Trumpvvon556 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do these people read if they dont have an internal dialog? i thought most people could think faster than their mouth could move. Maybe when you are 2-3 years old you read each word at the speed you would say it outloud because you are saying it in your head, but once you get better at reading you no longer sound out the words in your head.

I remember a reddit thread that 5 various definitions of an apple, from a simple outline to a really low resolution one, to one in full detail with the characteristic spade shaped jagged edge leaves. It asked which one can you visualize in your head. And most of the people responded that they cannot visualize it at all.

No inner dialogue and no ability to visualize. They are literally NPCs.

2
Trumpvvon556 2 points ago +3 / -1

there are very few movies made after 1999 that dont have some kind of BS in it that i notice now, there will still be that random feminist man/patriarchy hating statement in there somewhere.

There are a few movies that I have enjoyed: 1917, The Northman, The Wind That Shakes The Barley, Margin Call, about anything from Mel Gibson and Clint Eastwood

1
Trumpvvon556 1 point ago +2 / -1

there was [i think] that new Batgirl movie, that was completely done filming and in post production, and they just canceled it. It will never be shown on a screen.

Funny shit!

1
Trumpvvon556 1 point ago +2 / -1

what bothers me most about Hollywood movies now is 2 things:

  • there are no more risk taking on low budget movies that arent some pop-comedy. There are no longer these movies that are low budget, low risk, and may not be successful in their current premier but become cult and critic favorites later.

  • the big budget movies are not catered to the english speaking audience anymore. The actors arent great, the dialogue isnt great, the plot is simplistic, but about every scene is extremely visually pleasing. If you watched the 1984 Dune and the 2021 Dune you would see exactly what I am talking about. Paul and the other characters do not have internal dialogue and you never get the sense that Paul is frightened about his uncertain future and attempting to be brave in spite of it like you did in the 1984 version. Why spend money on good acting and dialogue when its going to be dubbed over and the themes wont translate well into other languages anyways.

You can also look at the Transformers movies, which were a flop in the US but the Chinese absolutely loved them, so they made 5 more with 2 more coming.

4
Trumpvvon556 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kubrick made Eyes Wide Shut, which hit too close to home for the rest of the Pedowood cabal. He couldnt be allowed to continue.

2
Trumpvvon556 2 points ago +2 / -0

the funniest thing about this is all the woke crap coming out now was produced starting 2-3 years ago. that is the duration it takes from start to being ready for a screen. This is all the Hollywood woke crap that they bet on being successful coming to fruition now. they bet wrong 2 - 3 years ago and are paying for it now.

1
Trumpvvon556 1 point ago +1 / -0

i can see lots of those people going to war against china no doubt, maybe not ukraine