I think all of us have limited time and may never find the time to read and research our topics of interest.
Which is why the rest of us who have should summarise the highlights and kind of executive summary.
For me the biggest breakthrough was the concept of there is no evidence that what we observe on a dying cell is caused by a specific mechanism. So, we may see a cell destoyed and next to it some weird looking particles. The asusmption is then made that those particles cause the cell destruction. However, we do not really know that. Unless a proper study is done. Correlation does not equal causation applies here.
Once I understood this concept then things started becoming clearer about many dogams in medicience inclusing of course the alledge viruses or an alledged novel coronavirus for the subject matter.
In the case of SARS CoV 2 (or n-CoV-19) as originally called this is what happened:
The doctors who reported this first did not follow the routine investigation methods for patients presenting with pneumonia. This is why I asked you to focus on the 3 minutes in that video. the narrators bring this up as something perhaps worth noting but this is the absolute source of the entire hoax. The doctors disregarded common causes of community acquired pneumonia and did not perform the tests you would usually perform. Therefore we do not know if the patients died of known pathogens (you see this goes against the terrain theory and sides with the germ theory because it is a unique argument of my own).
So the doctors did not examine for the common bacterialcauses, fungi or parasites and instead decided to screen for viruses. This is not common practice.
They then found a genetic sequence that resembled in part with a genetic sequence of SARS.
They run the sequence through a software to fill in the missing nucleotide gaps and the software came up with a final (propabilistic) sequence that they named n-CoV-19. That is a novel coronavirus.
Anyone who has done statistics and has used statistical programs knows about a function where you ask the software to fill in the gaps on missing values based on a best guess algorithm. This is what they did in Wuhan !
The researchers then gave that genome as proof of a novel coronavirus to the WHO who then gave it to Drosten who in less than 24 hours published a paper (in the Eurosurveillance paper) proclaiming he has manufactured a diagnostic test for that genome that was provided by the Chinese CDC. Drosten says in the Eurosurveillance paper that published the PCR method he does not have access to the virus. Yet he delivered a diagnosis for it.
So to summarise:
The doctors who saw patients with pneumonias in Wuhan in late 2019 did not follow routine and standard medical practice to fully investigate those patients. They instead went on a targeted fishing expedition to uncover some genetic material that resembled known genetic material akin to a previous virus. they used a software platform to complete the gaps of the genome and gave the genome to Drosten who then devised a diagnosis for that virtual genetic sequence.
If this does not call the scam as it is I do not know what does.
Anyone who wants to have a fight about it now then bring it on with facts and figures.
This is why i say it is a scam hidden in plain sight. Every and I mean every medical doctor knows what investigations they would commonly run on a patient with suspected pneumonia but noone bothered to read the original publication. If they would have read the paper their hair would fall off. Malpractice would be the least they would call what was written down by the authors in that NEJM paper.
I also trust that you have read the entirety of WHO's Conceptual zero draft for the consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its third meeting and you agree with its proposals since you are an avid supporter of viruses.
This is an experiment that the team of Bailey/Cowan/Kaufman proposed re proving the existence of virus.
Have a read and tell us your scientific objections please.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
Happy to debate on scientific grounds with you.
Do you think I have time to type?
Get on a call with me and I will let you know. Talking is faster.
What's your phone number? I am confident after talking to you I will be able to convince you that at least SARS-CoV-2 is a virtual only non-physical entity.
My sincere apologies for insulting thee