2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're right, I should have pruned better, fixed now, on both ends. Your infant remark was what I first removed and commented on. I appreciate both of yours help going forward. Edit: my apologies for my poor time management issues this last little while.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was being silly with you, I'll delete

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't mind what was between me and him. Your comment was removed for attacking the user not the argument, maybe reread what I removed?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was replying to me and I deleted my comment after he read it. The mod won't delete if you don't break the rules, so keep that in mind.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Comment removed by user for being silly 🤪

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Removed for another rule 1 violation. Knock it off dude.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

removed for rule 1. I know you know better

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hilarious!
We attack arguments here, not people.(rule 1)
If you have nothing to add as a refute, it is better to bow out and keep your integrity. I hope you'll do better going forward.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1: attack the argument, not the person
Can be approved upon edit

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good luck getting targeted by seething psychos and glowie feds who can't handle the Truth!

The rabbit hole goes deeper than that, fren 🕳️🐇

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll second that I don't think Dr. Andreas Noack is controlled op but it is good to question things and people, praying to the Most High God who knows everything can also be very helpful :o)

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll take your word for it, would probably push me over the edge of insanity and I'm standing too close as it is..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yahweh's Salvation Anointed was Yahweh before He was Salvation Anointed, "Before Moses was, I AM", (Yahweh).

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

We can't be certain of paid shill status.. It's an attack. I'm leaving this one for converstaion purposes.

People are allowed to disagree and repeat their ideas, within reason, I'm personally tired of repeating myself tho..

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I disagree. We debate worldviews here and it isn't an attack on your person but rather the worldview they think you have, is there an echo? Hello, hello..

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Then refute their argument..
I can say anything is a lie too.. It's not a rebuttal and it's lazy dude. And yes, I'm on your case but it's because I want you to try better, people are allowed to disagree and then we rebuttal.

And stop trying to kick people off the site.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Misquoting is an attack on the person, not the argument.

The comment on a supposed worldview is not an attack to your person but on a worldview they think you hold, it can and should be refuted so you are better understood.

It could be a misunderstanding of how you present your beliefs. Same with different world shapes theories can be refuted if misunderstood. We should debate these things.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›