I disagree. We debate worldviews here and it isn't an attack on your person but rather the worldview they think you have, is there an echo? Hello, hello..
Then refute their argument..
I can say anything is a lie too.. It's not a rebuttal and it's lazy dude. And yes, I'm on your case but it's because I want you to try better, people are allowed to disagree and then we rebuttal.
And stop trying to kick people off the site.
Misquoting is an attack on the person, not the argument.
The comment on a supposed worldview is not an attack to your person but on a worldview they think you hold, it can and should be refuted so you are better understood.
It could be a misunderstanding of how you present your beliefs. Same with different world shapes theories can be refuted if misunderstood. We should debate these things.
Removed for rule 1
Argument will need to be edited for approval and not misquoting user
Removed for rule 1
No argument to save
Removed for Rule 1
Argument?:
That's how I know I'm on the right track
Calling someone a bot is another rule 1 violation. As well as putting words in someones mouth..
Is there no other way to communicate your point? It's a rule 1 violation and does nothing for your point.
This is full of rule 1 accusations dude. I know you can communicate without it but you keep choosing not to, why?
Edit: I'm also asking the user you replied to about their violation.
Link to first comment asking to pick 3:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASGEEvCuW/round-table-discussion-the-world/c/4eblBBLoMwo
I've tried many times to finish the Ra and the Hidden Hand interviews and I'm having a lot of issues getting thru it, it's not even fun as a thought experiment, it holds no interest for me and I'm not getting anything out of it and I'm sorry, I wanted to try to find some common ground and it is there I just don't know to bridge the gap on this. I get an F on this course..
I started adding notes per session to share and I doubted it would suffice.
I'm actually curious. I've been moderating behaviour not content and I haven't done what you say I did.
Removed for rule 1.
Argument:
To disprove the "flat earthers" just give us a continuous live feed of video mounted on the outside of the craft, additionally on the inside from take off to Orbit and show us the earth/takeoff process. It's really that easy.
They're supposedly going anyway. Just do it. Show us the ball and the planes flying underneath the ball within the atmosphere.
You guys have the 30 Billion budget, you have to prove what you're telling us, flat earthers don't have the budget, just going off the information given and what's not adding up.
Flat earthers are vilified but havnt done any true space experiments cause we don't have the money, so why such pushback if it's a fringe idea.
You can say "I think we live in a computer simulation" everyone will agree and have no problems
"I think we live on a flat plan" Brooooo what the fuck!! --- You don't really. Believe that.
Did I miss something being said against you?
I haven't removed it yet because I was waiting for the other user to edit themselves, it's the first time I've asked them.
Edit: and I don't hate Tallest edit2: and arguments are being saved
Who do you say that He is?
hmm, I like it, maybe I should get a badge 🌟
That makes a lot of sense. And yeah, editing someone's words as if they said it is illegal and more than that violates the moral law I adhere to. Thanks for helping me learn new stuff.
It has come to my attention that what I thought was borderline against you is actually a violation, I've asked them to edit and wanted to say I'm sorry.
It's come to my attention that the 'are you an idiot?' That I thought was borderline is actually a violation of rule 1. Are you willing to edit please?
I haven't and have no capabilities to edit your words under your comment. My removing your comment and replying with your argument is not against the law.
I'm trying to read up on this. Tbd. I can also chime Perun if you'd like his input.
We can't be certain of paid shill status.. It's an attack. I'm leaving this one for converstaion purposes.
People are allowed to disagree and repeat their ideas, within reason, I'm personally tired of repeating myself tho..