Misquoting is an attack on the person, not the argument.
The comment on a supposed worldview is not an attack to your person but on a worldview they think you hold, it can and should be refuted so you are better understood.
It could be a misunderstanding of how you present your beliefs. Same with different world shapes theories can be refuted if misunderstood. We should debate these things.
I disagree. We debate worldviews here and it isn't an attack on your person but rather the worldview they think you have, is there an echo? Hello, hello..
Misquoting is an attack on the person, not the argument.
The comment on a supposed worldview is not an attack to your person but on a worldview they think you hold, it can and should be refuted so you are better understood.
It could be a misunderstanding of how you present your beliefs. Same with different world shapes theories can be refuted if misunderstood. We should debate these things.
Total fucking bullshit and you know it. You’re now actively ignoring rule 1.
I disagree. We debate worldviews here and it isn't an attack on your person but rather the worldview they think you have, is there an echo? Hello, hello..
It’s not a matter of agreement. He’s lying. He has been told the truth already. He continues to lie. It’s an attack.
Would you like to resolve the conflict? We can try it here or at c/CommunitiesConflict