2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does rule 1 not include name calling? It is included in attack no way around it for my brain.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does that mean you want this thread to be a free for all? It's your content here even tho I posted it.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did, it's still funny to me, I've used that many times myself. We can disagree and I can still laugh about stuff.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Name calling does nothing for healthy discussion and I think it's a lazy cop out that makes people look out of rebuttals. In other words it makes one look poorly and I'm hoping to build people up and we should all be able to admit when we are wrong or out of defenses, honorable type stuff.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

He said if he'd banned one he would have to ban the other and he had decided to ignore things and then went missing. I'm not going to ignore things and I don't plan to go missing..

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clem removed comments of name calling and death wishing. Should I gather receipts for you?

I read the interaction differently and have a comment out to SwampRangers to clarify for us.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mod logs are public.
I see no way of understanding name calling not being an attack in the person and not the argument.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your comment ' You're literally a Hollow Earther according to HH on 10-24 21:53 and you're literally defending that as the most accurate explanation of any in the world.'

Is being understood as a slur and then you were slurred against and me and Graph are at an impasse about this.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is name calling an attack? (Yes) And can you prove your point in mod logs before me? I actually studied it.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rule 1 has always been a rule here. The only rule I updated was 3 and I think prev mods would agree but they're not here right now.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know what you said, doesn't change the rules.

I have read some of it. I didn't know I should prepare a book report for you but I guess I'll have to put more effort for you so we can continue talking. Can I add suggestions for reading too? Or have you already formed your opinion on our Creator?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't have all the answers but I told you where I was right now in learning.

There is much more killing to discuss also and I also struggle with it. I do know that God is the best option on the market and these evil things wouldn't happen if there wasn't a chasm created when we and the fallen seperated ourselves from Him.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who are we to question His timing? Where were we when He formed the world and made all things?

Yes, He flooded the earth and regretted His creation of us, that is a tough day dude..

He stops evil and defeated it thru Jesus and we are still waiting for it to be dissolved.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Calling a user a faggot would be a rule 1 violation, even if you're frustrated.
Are you willing to edit?

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wasn't avoiding but did need the pointing out, thanks.

This is tough stuff I'm still trying to understand, this is where I am right now:
Should God not stop evil?
Can you imagine knowing what great evil was to come and could it be loving to avoid that for them?
I don't think death is always a condemnation and I think those under the age of consent are automatically saved to God.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›