You’d be wrong, yeah. Please keep posting; your one-click content deletion will be more painful for you that way.
What rape?
lol, the jew thinks rape can’t exist conceptually. Please keep posting; your one-click content deletion will be more painful for you that way.
Yes, you’re referring to things that don’t exist. I don’t care. Please keep posting; your one-click content deletion will be more painful for you that way.
Please keep posting; your one-click content deletion will be more painful for you that way.
”anyone who doesn’t worship jews is a not zee”
Thanks for clarifying your position. Please keep posting; your one-click content deletion will be more painful for you that way.
YOU say what my other sockpuppet accounts that have been banned say, because you oppose them!
I love that getting your main account permanently banned for all eternity and all your content deleted has left you completely mind broken.
“Serial rape doesn’t have any effect on the psychology of the person doing it”
Only a jew would say this.
The exact opposite of your subhuman kike’s statement has been proven true, though.
held
You’re genuinely retarded.
Wow, the paid jewish shill sockpuppet account wants everyone who doesn’t worship jews murdered, no matter who they are. Who would have thought!
You just say exactly what he said in exactly the same way he said it alongside dozens of other accounts simultaneously.
Sure, sure.
Thanks for admitting it’s not sarcasm.
Ah, you’re talking about the Amish, not Mennonites (for the most part). We don’t really associate with them beyond economically. They’re a psychotic cult that rapes their own children.
They also don’t fight back when they’re attacked.
If you look at their fruits, it's what you'd (well what I'd) expect.
Inviolate worship of jews, even when directly confronted. Unfortunately.
I've also heard word that the moderation at c/Conspiracies is mostly asleep or on vacation.
A few people have tried to broach this to the admins to get living mods put back into place, at least.
trying to infiltrate this forum due to the void of moderation
It can sometimes do good things, though. KotakuInAction2 has dead mods, which has allowed all of the real users there to start talking about the jews for once.
JosephMalta may be aka DresdenFirebomber or a co-worker at the same tel aviv bot farm.
I’ve no doubt.
Cool; more things not related to anything anyone was talking about about.
to my having an ahistorical Jesus
Which you do.
Why ask about the name and then get upset when someone tells you about it?
Accurate description of the person based on his statement, which is in direct violation of all linguistic definitions.
Maybe the mentally ill person should have used the textbook definition of “my people” instead of lying like a filthy, subhuman jew, right?
His conception of “Jesus” sits outside every written history thereof.
You'd need a physical lightspeed test not dependent on radiation
What the absolute fuck do you think light is.
Two known classes of error ranges disagree incompatibly.
Not at all what’s being said.
1 Peter 1:12
Thanks for the random quote that doesn’t refute what I said, nor does it even pretend to defend your claim that God is a liar.
Kinda like supersession.
The thing Christ Himself explicitly said, you mean?
I'll ask Jesus.
So you can’t answer and you admit that the Bible is not 100% literal; got it.
No, off topic.
No response; you’ve conceded the argument. Thanks for admitting it’s on topic.
No, false dilemma.
No response; you’ve conceded the argument. Thanks for admitting the old standards of measurement are lying to you.
I'm happy to be persecuted in the name of Yahweh, Jehovah, Yeshua, or Jesus.
“I’m totally okay with not even knowing God’s name!” ~ the insane
You imply you want to get rid of the 95%, I got rid of it for you.
By destroying the other 5%. The erasure of all known laws of physics otherwise doesn’t save much.
Not asymptotic, exponential.
Asymptotic because your own premise claims “inevitable collapse,” but we’re nitpicking here.
We see it wherever there is room and fuel to grow.
Apparently not, because we don’t actually see it.
the number of ELEs we'd expect from getting hit for billions of years.
What number is that?
such perfect equilibrium is absurd.
Why.
WAP then.
“NOOOOOO OBSERVATIONAL REALITY IS ITSELF A FALLACY! MY EXISTENCE ISN’T PROOF OF MY EXISTENCE!” ~ the clinically insane
Also called the Oxygen Holocaust? Around here we call it Day Three. Funny, life found a way against the odds, must be WAP again.
So you can’t answer the question? Got it.
But evolutionists believe in extinction of billions of species, even though we only have a few million today, because they keep getting "replaced" so fast. No evidence for those billions either; only for separately barcoded stable kinds.
So there’s no evidence for the 100 billion people who died in the past because “there are only 8 billion alive today.” Got it.
(1) Your dismissing a known seven billion is sus.
- Fucking what.
- You still didn’t answer the question.
Pop growth has setbacks but there's no reason for such a severe global one
“Inability to sustain such a population with the resources available, and in the face of whites specifically ceasing to keep them alive, because they’re literally only alive today because of things being stolen to whites.”
That’d be a reason, irrespective of any external forces that make it impossible regardless of “good” intentions.
and no moral justification to countenance any such reason.
“I don’t want my people to be exterminated” is a moral justification.
Revelation gives natural limits of two waves of mass global extinction being a quarter and a third, which together might be taken as a half; so that implies by fiat there's no going back to one billion.
Because “hang on” effects can’t exist, definitely.
My club has superior power, Jesus and me and some others.
Neat. Since you seem to be the one who thinks he gets to dictate when The Day will be, why don’t you run your cosmological model through a computer and tell us when the laws of physics have to break down due to the slowing of light, and therefore the day when Christ will return? After all, you can’t reduce the strength of radiation indefinitely, and you’re already demanding people accept your “range of measurements” for the speed of light across time. Why not extrapolate that timeframe forward (just like the redshifters have extrapolated the timeframe backward) so you can know The Day (and be instantly killed for it, because the Bible says no man will know the day)?
Now go ahead and pretend you “thought of that” eventuality in your model before reading the preceding paragraph.
When you stop listening to the cabal lies you'll be so happy!
You wouldn’t know about that, though.
But never a single global ELE in billions of years.
Already linked directly to five of them. And those are just the big ones.
It's a theory!
We’ve seen it happen.
Since today's spirals weren't created billions of years ago
[citation needed]
a Just So story
Otherwise known as “objective observable reality” and “the laws of physics, which are immutable, as per God’s own design.” Wow, such a stretch to think about.
So you do believe
Thanks for admitting you can’t refute the information presented, instead falling back to strawmen.
In a young universe they were all formed at the same time.
And made to look old, thereby rendering your god as a deceiver.
you invent a new bad theory.
“God lies to me. This is a good theory because I invented it.” ~ the clinically insane
Not really
Thanks for admitting that galactic collisions prove the outgassing of material that then may go on to coalesce into its own independent galactic shapes, irregular, elliptical, spiral, or otherwise.
various snapshots of different collision moments don't require a narrative of spirals forming from elliptics.
It’s what happens to every other idealized sphere of matter at every other scale when external motion is applied, so yes, it does.
The population of spirals is an embarrassment for old-age.
You’ve provided zero evidence for this emotional statement, no matter how many times you repeat it. Stars keep being formed. We see them formed. Stars keep exploding. We see them exploding. Systems keep coalescing. We see them coalescing. Everything you believe has no observation anywhere in nature.
Then you can't have carbon without black holes
Regular novae exist. Nothing you say or do will ever change this.
Stellar fusion gets along very well without such a program.
Supernovae exist. Nothing you say or do will ever change this.
Cool story bro.
Thanks for admitting that you either accept objective reality or simply don’t comprehend how matter works.
And totally not a proof of billions of years or of this actually happening
We’ve seen it happen.
created to avoid reference to God.
It’s irrelevant to the existence of God.
Nobody's observed creation of a solar system.
Not said.
Implicit in the claim.
In fact you just implied that however far back in time are the galaxies we look at, the population is the same.
Exact opposite implication on my part.
Different tectonics and flows yield different rocks next door to each other
And they just so happened to look like meteor craters, and not like any form of erosion ever recorded, but it’s totally erosion. Right?
Never said that
Cool, so the Flood didn’t cause the meteor craters that observationally predate all of human history. OH! You’ve just reminded me of Gobekli Tepe, which was humans recording the end of the Younger Dryas Period at a time that aligned with a measurable cosmological event.
Erosion seems not good for measuring craters beyond about 50,000 years
So… still not your timeframe.
Floods redeposit sediment that is compressed by gravity and that traps organic remains all the time, we call them mudslides when they're small enough.
And that’s how all the fossils were created, right? The ones separated by hundreds of meters of depth?
(OP permitted hundreds of thousands)
So… death existed before Adam.
You mean that because the Bible implies Jericho is younger than 11,000 years
It doesn’t. That’s the point.
if the whole scale is wrong then…
…the laws of physics break down. You’re just playing buggers at this point by throwing out all physical observations that have never changed no matter when they were observed.
the redshift must necessarily indicate constant lightspeed
Light speed is constant. The proper motion of spacetime itself need not be.
I see no problem with putting light at a faster speed in the past too.
Other than the physical impossibility of it while retaining the known laws of physics.
The past measurements were not about wrong math, but about known error ranges.
So… wrong math, since the error ranges were wrong.
If the math was wrong we'd correct the measurements
We did. They’re better now. They’ll be even better in the future. The reason light speed isn’t a perfect 300,000,000 is that we guessed in the past and got better at measuring in the present. I’m honestly surprised you didn’t mention that as “evidence” for your claims. I guess it would have put a “soft” quantifier on the rate of speed reduction that would lead people to more easily calculate the day that the laws of physics break down–and therefore prove The Day by which Christ must return, and so you didn’t want to draw attention to that.
Your story of years of death before Adam, with a new kind sin-death being introduced by the fall, might involve…
Plants. Animals. Things we know God created before Man.
"fruit brings death" being silly
Sin-death. Christ Himself repeatedly makes a distinction between the death of the body and the death of the soul. I’d ask which one you think is worse, but you think they’re the same.
It's so silly it needs a whole new wonky explication
The one you’re giving it? Nah, it’s not needed.
if it's just Skil implying and never defining
Defined everything I said. Why don’t you go ahead and define the date (ooh! It can be a range!) when physics breaks down under your system. Then we’ll just wait Two More Weeks™ and watch it happen!
it's further silly by not being even a theory but just my guess of your theory.
So maybe don’t use strawmen in the future?
Laws were much the same.
Couldn’t be. If physical death and sin death are the same (Bible says otherwise), no physical interactions took place between any matter before the first bite of the fruit. There’s your universal creation story! It wasn’t finite matter being compressed into an infinitesimal region of infinite heat and infinite density; it was a woman taking a bite of fruit! The Big Bite! Boy, talk about shekinah glory! Maybe those christkillers were on to something when they made their “culture” matrilineal! Definitely not just because their men are so pathetic they can’t win wars, and so they had to come up with an excuse for why their “culture” passed down through the war bounty–I mean–their women.
The moment that the devil fell, a little before Eve
A couple of minutes, at least.
This began light decay by a quantum jump
Holy shit, lead with this next time. This is fascinatingly stupid. You should have made your OP an explanation of this. It’s at least interesting and a genuinely new way of looking at things. You might lead someone sane to a lateral thought that solves a real problem if you expound on that.
increased entropy
Whoops, you just admitted death existed before the Big Bite. If entropy existed at all, that’s death.
Mass, energy, info retain nature.
And again, you admit death without sin is irrelevant in a pre-Fall world, because the laws of physics ensure no information loss despite mass-energy state changes.
And the carborn formation phase is under 1,000 years.
Cool. Space is big, though. Lot of volume.
And none of these snapshots require assembly into the billions story.
They do if you want to keep claiming the laws of physics haven’t completely changed.
Correct, halos are formed from catastrophe.
Which are recorded to have happened, yeah.
You mean different half-lives?
Same isotopes. Same half-lives. Different amounts of the isotope left. Can’t happen if they were all created at once.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yarrabubba_impact_structure&oldid=1302313723
eroded remnant of an impact crater… With an age of 2.229 ± 0.005 billion years, as of 2025 it is the oldest known impact structure on Earth of confident age.
Yes... didn’t.
Facially that says that younger craters erode and older don't.
… what.
If a class asked you to teach why the billions, they wouldn't want appeal to authority and circular argument
Ah, so they wouldn’t accept the Bible? But I’d still use it. God is required for the Universe to exist, after all, no matter the foundational theory thereof.
The heavens don't proclaim billions.
Thanks for admitting God doesn’t lie.
So you don't believe in the ten billion years? Or you do?
All you have to do is just not lie about what others say.
Either way your credibility remains shot.
[citation needed]
The point is that the horizon problem is no problem in a young universe, just as I implied.
And the universe isn’t young, as all observational reality shows.
OP is not about the idea that there were a few myriad more years, it's about the idea that there were billions of years.
Which you explain away by demanding a few myriad more years at best.
Checkmate in three ... two ….
You were checkmated before you posted, yes. There’s no need for a countdown.
You’d be wrong, yeah. Please keep posting; your one-click content deletion will be more painful for you that way.