All scientists admit incomplete knowledge

Thanks for asserting something no one questioned. They know this. Get over it.

the assumption of constant lightspeed is not a proven necessity

[citation needed]

I already linked you to proof that NASA doesn't know how old, since the light is measured at 11-18 billion and the stars at 9 billion. Therefore it's not proven that either number is accurate.

Spacetime moves. The “steady state” theory was discredited nearly 150 years ago. The people who held it cited it as proof God doesn’t exist. What are you doing.

neither side can be "proven"

Translation: “I have fucking nothing to defend my claims and even your incomplete model has destroyed them, therefore we should just agree to disagree, goyim!”

Now I'm willing to shoulder the burden of proof to the same extent others are

So much so that you can’t provide any citations or sources for your claims.

But we'll muddle along anyway, since I'm pretty confident you don't want to agree to anything or attempt to prove anything.

Translation: “You already proved me wrong, so now I can’t even pretend to defend my claims. Therefore I’m going to couch my argument in the claim that you’re doing what I have actually done!”

Strawman, illogical.

Thanks for admitting that you’re physically incapable of defending your claims that light speed changes.

I told you that the measurement history of the speed of light gives rise to the possibility.

Provide evidence that the fidelity of measurements has not changed, then.

…does not change optical effects… it does get radiation moving faster.

What happens to radiation when it moves faster.

a number of other proofs of young age of the universe

Would that number be zero?

I am under no such duty.

Thanks for conceding the argument and admitting your claims are all false. Enjoy never being accepted by “the scientific community,” for whom you have nothing but contempt.

I asked for people who want to improve my understanding and explain things to me more adequately

More adequately than the thing you refuse to defend?

You don't demonstrate that desire

Translation: “You hurt my feelings with truth I can’t refute.”

It's sufficient for me to answer your illogic

You’ve yet to.

"I could just go on with the things I have" means that, without you supplying alternate proof, the evidence I supplied is sufficient no matter what I add.

Thanks for admitting there’s no evidence anywhere for the universe being smaller or younger than it is observed as being.

To add more would invite accusations of Gish gallop.

No one gives a shit. Only paid shills ever use that term. “Every single thing in the universe proves this idea right therefore it’s wrong because there’s so much proof” is what the mentally ill say.

the cabal believes overpopulation and underpopulation never occur in billions of years

Random claim not backed by any evidence and disproven after five seconds on any search engine.

the solar system never disassembled and the galaxies never lost their spiral forms despite the warping of billions of years of time

Yes, and?

(there are no grandfather-class H-He galaxies that the stellar evolution model predicts)

What, like at the dawn of the Universe?

and embedded radiohalos evidence rapid formation and cooling of sediment contrary to extended age.

How does rapid formation contradict extended age? What have they to do with each other?

You show you're so indoctrinated that you don't even quote evidence or attempt to question the mainstream.

1. Complete strawman.
2. Blatant trolling, pretending it has never read a single thing I’ve written on any subject.
3. Mentally crippled claim that 2+2≠4 simply because other people say it does.

"If humanity is millions of years old, death didn't come into the world by one man Adam" because in that model there would have been billions of years of death before Adam.

Why.

but since you haven't put out any theory or proof I suppose I should go back to saying you don't believe anything and don't prove anything.

Look in a fucking mirror, light denier.

Thanks for admitting you’re a bot.

It would get paid less that way.

All known theories violate the laws of physics in one place or another

Nope.

Look at the article I linked on VSL and ask why there are several peer-reviewed theories and the subject keeps coming up due to incompleteness in the standard model.

We’re not talking about the standard model. We're talking about the speed of light and the nature of optics. You failed. It didn’t work. You cannot misdirect me.

Anyway, your ordinary retort is not how I proposed the debate.

I don’t give a shit what you proposed. Prove light speed isn’t light speed. Prove it has ever changed or can ever change within a single medium. Prove that optical effects related to proper motion can be masked or imitated by other observational, recordable phenomena.

Good fucking luck.

I asked if you'd like to prove me wrong

And I don’t give a shit. You have to prove yourself right.

I could just go on with the things I have.

Olease do; you deserve more humiliation.

Also there's no reason for you as a Christian to take your ordinary approach against a Christian topic

Lying about the nature of reality to call God into question isn’t a Christian topic.

very botlike

You wouldn’t know a bot if your account was replaced by one.

If humanity is millions of years old, death didn't come into the world by one man Adam

Ignoring the strawman of the first part of that, you’re utterly retarded for claiming these are related.

As long as you're having fun with it and people are informed and you're pretending to try to prove me wrong ….

As long as you’re being paid to spam this website with lies, at least pretend that you can defend them with citations and sources.

Two more days. Just keep waiting. Trust the plan.

Boy, you really are a parody account, aren't you.

Thanks for admitting that you have absolutely nothing to defend your psychotic claims that violate the laws of physics.

[zero evidence for claims in any capacity]

Dismissed as false.

So… nothing, then. In addition to being objectively incorrect about everything you say politically, you can’t even defend your lies about other users. Thanks for confirming.

Just like the piss tape, right? Two more weeks, just keep waiting, trust the plan.

soap box

What has he posted that has been incorrect? Conversely, what has TheImpossible1 posted that has not been incorrect?

Why won’t you write a sequel to your fan fiction? I keep asking your sockpuppets and they never oblige. Why don’t you seem to know anything about me other than this one line you’ve invented out of thin air? Surely you could at least lie some more, since you lied about this in the first place.

Oh, and surely you can prove anything you say on any subject, when you’re met with direct citations to firsthand sources that prove you wrong… but you don’t? I don’t get it.

Thanks for admitting you have absolutely nothing to defend yourself with.

failed apologetic of light trails

Funny how I came up with it myself, so I can’t see how you’d know anything about it. Almost as though your entire worldview is a known hoax or something.

To be murdered later by communists. Neck yourself, yid.

“God is a deceiver because he openly lies to me about creating light from distant stars “mid stream” on the way to Earth, but he’s totally worth following!”

Literally your argument.

Neat; no one will ever believe you.

Reply, bot. Your contract of employment demands it.

natalism failed under [country that exterminated its own subjects instead of promoting natalism]

Neat; you’re shit at your job.

the ideology that axiomatically cannot fail will lose to the ideology that fails after a single generation

This is how mentally ill jews actually are.

jewish media says thing

therefore thing true

die now lol

I love how every single comment and post you’ve ever made will be wiped and no one will remember you ever existed.

Got it in one, my friend.

Thanks for admitting every link he posted was true.

Zero effort spam. Reply again, paid jewish shill.

the man who has worshipped jews his entire life and has never disobeyed them HASN’T WORSHIPPED JEWS ENOUGH!

Yeah, your people do behave like that, don’t they.

Neat, but everything he said is independently verifiable as true, whereas nothing you’ve said is even being defended by the person saying it.