Thanks for admitting that Trump isn’t different from Harris in any way. You’ve conceded the argument and admitted I’m right.
AGW doesn’t exist.
Thanks for admitting that anthropogenic global warming doesn’t exist. Reported for spam.
Incapable of describing or proving the fallacy.
identical things are different because jews say so
believe me why won’t you believe me oy vey you’re insane
It isn’t working. You failed. We will never support your hoaxes again/
Yep, reported for violating the only rule of the board. You’ve conceded the argument and admitted I’m right.
[no argument]
You’ll hang with the rest of them.
Reported for continued spam and violation of federal law regarding the use of paid accounts to craft consensus.
Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.
“Waaaaa! What about the ice caps!”
They’re not melting. They go through cycles. 1974 had less ice than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what scientists say, whatever you do. Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been growing for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? They show that the past was hotter.
“But the sea level is rising!”
It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
“But ocean acidity!”
Guess what? It’s also cyclical.
“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”
They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”
Sorry, there never was any consensus.
“Then why don’t climate change deniers publish papers?”
Because they do (and because papers often aren’t published because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).
”So what the hell is this all about?”
The purposeful destruction of the economy and infrastructure of the Western world and only the Western world.
None of the data supports the existence of AGW.
“WAA! IT’S ONLY UNITED STATES TEMPERATURES!”
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. WARMING.
At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that there has been zero change since modern recordings began. Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, ADMITTED TO THIS.
"WAAAAAA THE DOCUMENT ENDS IN 1995!"
And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
“But weather is becoming more extreme!”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.
USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.
Not tornadoes. Five (nearly six now) consecutive years of below average events. Not hurricanes. Every single indicator shows they’re not only becoming less frequent, but also less powerful. Not even drought. Hilarious! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, this has been known for a while. It’s global cooling’s fault, after all! Oh, wait… NOAA wouldn’t want you to hear this now, would they?
Your narrative is predicated on laziness. Your narrative is predicated on people not doing their homework and not comprehending the data they see. Your narrative is predicated on appeals to authority and the expectation that your masters will never lie to you. That’s the only way it has ever existed.
a jew puppet that lies to you about committing genocide on you is better than a jew puppet that tells the truth about committing genocide on you
No, that’s not what better means.
Lol he literally did fix the economy twice.
Printing seven trillion in new fiat currency and pushing inflation to 15% year over year is not “fixing the economy.” You’re not a serious account and you never have been.
You're bad at this job.
The paid shill cries out in pain as it strikes you.
Stick to the he did good to lure you into supporting him attack vector.
He did no good. Literally nothing. Every action he took in office served foreigners and nonwhites exclusively.
Mans fixed Obama's mess
Made it worse in every metric. More nonwhite invaders than ever before. More inflation than ever before. More unemployment than ever before. Global martial law for a fake virus. Tens of billions to Israel. Fewer deportations than King Nigger. You’re not even pretending to be a serious account.
than pulled off the covid recovery.
Caused the Covid situation in the first place.
Your msnbc talking points
I say the opposite of what MSNBC says…
Project somewhere else, you filthy fucking kike. There is no global warming.
Why would he fix the border when his owners told him not to? Why didn’t he do it during his first term if he was going to do it?
Why would he fix the economy when his owners told him not to? Why didn’t he do it during his first term if he was going to do it?
Why would RFK achieve anything when his owners told him not to?
Oh well. Doesn’t matter.
Drink bleach, yid. AGW doesn’t exist and never has. Your spam account isn’t fooling anyone.
Maybe you should just keep voting. That will surely work.
global warming rate
You mean 0.0° per year, right? Because it’s not warming at all.
I love that you’re still linking to a deleted thread that the board owner said you will be banned if you ever post again.
Keep it up, jew.
u/tallestskil still cannot answer this
Already answered hundreds of times. You’re a paid jewish shill purposely lying about the contents of the Bible, so your bullshit is dismissed off-hand.
Eat shit, paid jewish shill.
They’ve basically already won. What more violence is needed?
Mr Beast scams people to get subscribers
Uh, no shit. Why would this even be listed?
The student said that Thanksgiving Day 'was only made so America could have a holiday in each month.
That’s just a kid being stupid. They’re children.
Once the White House Government falls to the legion of roving far left supremacists
You mean since 1930?
the far-left and far-right warlords will search each individual internet history of every man, woman and children living in the United States, and will likely ask the UN to provide them if they raided Twitter and Google HQ and cannot find them.
They already have that data. 11 Eyes ensures it.
This is why people fear the prospect of Internet Surveillance from corporate masterminds such as Microsoft or Google
It’s about 20 years too late to do anything.
Just make him stop existing. Don’t waste resources keeping him alive. Focus on your own people exclusively. Not first; exclusively.
Mandatory death penalty for any child rapist of any color, by the way.