7
TallestSkil 7 points ago +8 / -1

Just use the surname exclusively when speaking about it. If he complains, ask if he’ll change it once he gets married.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hell, my book’s section on hypernormalization was one of the first I wrote (nearly five years ago; kill me). We’re basically there already. Everyone, everywhere, just magically accepts food prices doubling in three years. No one gives a shit that gas was a quarter of the price just 20 years ago. Real salaries are… well. Please excuse the NigNog video, but it makes the point fairly concisely.

No one cares about anything. Government does whatever it wants. No repercussion. Social behaviors are completely different from just 50 years ago. Zero resistance. Forget “we’ve collapsed but are too afraid to admit it so we’ll just pretend we haven’t.” It’s literally “I don’t give a shit what civilization even is, so I have no mental frame of reference to judge a deviation or collapse therefrom in the first place.” This isn’t just hypernormalization. It’s hyperapathazation.

It’ll get to the point where whites will just be sitting in front of the television as niggers burst into our homes and not even look up as we’re shot one by one. Mark my fucking words.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mmm, there’s an idea.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why does the concept of hypernormalization mean anything about exceptionality of 2024?

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +6 / -2

You mean the same things that Trump supports? Almost as though voting has never existed.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

Go to hell, you fucking spambot.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

can it really be confirmed

I’m totally open to “relativity” being a farce and a new framework being put in place to describe observations over distance at speeds above 0.14c. I was careful in my wording to describe only what we’ve seen experimentally, not to subscribe to a specific interpretation like ‘relativity.’

Hell, we still don’t have a grand unified theory. If we can’t account for gravity in our calculations, why should we assume the calculations are universally correct?

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh. Really? The light cone is the 3D projection across distance and time wherein an object can be seen. Because nothing moves faster than light, anything outside the light cone can’t see the thing that made it. If something is not moving with relation to the observer, it will appear to be operating within the same reference frame as the observer because light from the object will arrive synchronously with light around the observer. That’s why the “clock” analogy is so often used. A second is an agreed-upon time that doesn’t change, but a clock’s motion with respect to the viewer changes the perceived length of a second (at a distance) due to the foreshortened or lengthened distance the light cone has to travel to reach the observer.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is no way for one frame to "know" it is moving faster than the other to slow its clocks down.

Well, it’s motion with respect to the light cone. You can’t move faster than your own light cone, but you can move closer to it than otherwise. It’s the same as the Doppler effect and sonic booms, except for mass-energy itself. I can understand that, at least.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

“Curved spacetime” is the allegorical explanation to physically describe the nature of relativity. I intrinsically distrust classical relativity theory simply because it was presented by a confirmed plagiarist, but we’ve measured what appear to be its effects in several ways, so it can’t really be denied.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

Imagine believing that.

Also, obligatory comment on a holiday so that an admitted homosexual is thrown into an apoplectic rage.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +3 / -4

[Asians are Caucasian because a word sounds the same!]

Yeah, you’re too stupid to be alive. They’re literally a different species.

by Dps1879
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

Planes exist. You are clinically insane. No one fell for it. Go away.

by Dps1879
2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it yours?

Volume of total fuel. Volume of wings. It fits. Get over it.

by Dps1879
2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, no, psychopath. It’s on you to prove that planes don’t exist, you stupid fucking kike shill.

by Dps1879
4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you need a video to explain how not all pumps in the world operate at the same flow rate?

by Dps1879
5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +6 / -1

Dunning Kruger on full display.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +3 / -2

Command+F

”jew”: 0 results

”Israel”: 0 results

Article is worthless.

✡Daniel Greenfield✡, a ✡Shillman✡ Journalism Fellow at the ✡David Horowitz✡ Freedom Center, is…

…worthless.

9
TallestSkil 9 points ago +10 / -1

It’s literally the jews.

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +9 / -3

Eh… nah. The Talmud (and Bible) are very explicit about the Holy Land being… the crux of the whole matter. The Ukraine will be sacrificed because only whites live there and jews don’t care how many whites are slaughtered as long as they’re making a profit on it. Meanwhile, Israel will expand its borders, eventually conquering everything it wants.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

offensive action will generally bring a bigger response than you are capable of handling.

Whites can do anything we put our minds to. Never forget that.

Gaining actual control of the propaganda machine is an effort that would take decades

It takes decades to destroy broadcast towers, power transmission lines, and satellite dishes?

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

You could not ever organize any kind of revolt. As you said yourself, it would be infiltrated.

So don’t. There’s plenty that can be done which doesn’t require organization.

The only violence required in mass noncompliance is defense if and when they unjustly come to take anything that is rightfully yours.

Translation: “Never actually do anything and instantaneously lose because you acted like a ✡libertarian✡ and refused to fight back until ten thousand of them were outside your personal home.”

any kind of offensive violence when you are outgunned and do not control the propaganda machine is DOA.

So control it.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is a part of why violence could not ever work: it could never be organized

You don’t seem to understand violence. You’re treating it like nonviolence. I have no idea why you’re doing this.

you cannot defeat the most powerful violent organization in history by beating them directly at their own game.

No one said anything about lining up and shooting muskets at one another.

Mass noncompliance (and parallel structures) requires no large scale organization

But does require violence, otherwise it doesn’t work.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›