1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

No. Commit suicide, paid shill. Your sockpuppets have no power here. I used it correctly. Fuck off back to Reddit.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOOK AT THE PIECE OF SHIT PAID SHILL WHO THINKS THIS IS A GOTCHA.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Neat. Reported for mass spam. You blew your account immediately.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wrong. Your sockpuppet is powerless here. Commit suicide.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

No. Try again.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just turn off the image context setting.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ignore bread. Consume circuses.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

you actually think I have stated a position on the argument????

So why are you even bothering to reply? It’s not an argument. There are no positions. Earth is not flat. It’s an oblate spheroid. We’re on a fucking planet hurtling around the Sun. That’s it. That’s what objective truth is.

Stop fucking replying if you have nothing to add.

I think you are retarded for blindly believing in a globe

I don’t have to blindly believe.

and you are retarded for not realising that I do not blindly believe in it

You are mentally ill. Yes. This was already known.

nor in flat earth

Then why are you defending it.

I am Agnostic...because there is no proof

There is. You are simply too stupid to understand it.

fake proof

Prove it.

you literally are referencing axioms

Wrong.

and correlation

Wrong.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

So you are also incapable of reading..nice.

Show where you answered the questions.

You are bad faith shill.

You post derogatory comments without posting any real proof....

The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.

Your questions prove a lack of understanding of some core basic logical components

Thanks for admitting that the Earth is not flat and that you are too stupid to answer any of the questions.

You are the well poisoner

Said the literal paid shill literally spamming proven lies.

otherwise you would have approached my comment with some legitimacy

You made no comment and have no legitimacy.

If you expect people to answer your gish gallop

Paid shill confirmed.

of gargbage logic

Thanks for admitting that you’re incapable of refuting anything I said.

You first have to set an example of decent arguments to begin with

Thanks for admitting that the Earth is not flat and that you are too stupid to answer any of the questions.

why not just put up a fake Bet while you are at it

You aren't actually critically thinking

The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.

so whatever.

Thanks for admitting that the Earth is not flat and that you are too stupid to answer any of the questions.

You cannot see the retardedness in your own 'questions' lol.

Thanks for admitting that the Earth is not flat and that you are too stupid to answer any of the questions.

Fuck off. No one here supports you or believes a word you say.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

They respond by saying the earth is a flat, infinite plane. No edge.

See, I love this idea. It’s at least creative and funny. But “infinite flat plane” is intriguing as a thought experiment. Think of all the lands we could conquer. How civilizations would grow and develop…

How would the gravity problem be solved? Assume “half land, half sky” (and ignore how masses behave under pressure) and you would have infinite mass pulling you in every (2D) direction at once, as well as straight down. Would that, then, “cancel out” and result in the “equivalence” of being pulled straight down to the (perfectly flat) ground? But then we have to address the behavior of masses under pressure (I’ve seen them say that Earth is “flat and hollow to get around this) and how an infinite plane Earth, even if it was only of a finite thickness, would still collapse into a singularity.

by pkvi
4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +7 / -3
  • Reminder that Musk will continue to ban any speech jews don’t like.
  • Reminder that Musk will not unban any accounts previously banned for speech.
  • Reminder that Twitter will not get any better, yet will somehow be able to get worse.
-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

Cool, thanks for admitting that the earth isn’t flat and that you have nothing to add here. Fuck off, you worthless well poisoning sack of shit. You won’t discredit real conspiracies with this garbage.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

Are you physically capable of answering a single question listed here.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

Go away, shill.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

Thanks for admitting that no one is coming to save you, no one will ever rise up, and nothing you say will ever change this. You have a containment board for your proven hoax, Qultist. Fuck off there and leave sane people alone.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

No more than what has already happened.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +4 / -3

Burn in hell, flatty.

  • Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
  • Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
  • Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
  • Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
  • Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
  • Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
  • Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
  • Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
  • Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
  • Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
  • If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
  • If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
  • A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
  • Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
  • Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
  • The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
  • What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
  • How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
  • Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
  • Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
  • Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
  • If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
  • If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
  • Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
  • How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
  • Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +3 / -2

Get an actual argument or fuck off, LARPer.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

There’s no evidence whatsoever that the shots are going to kill people en masse as has been previously claimed about mRNA events. Read the sentence again before autistically screaming in reply.

Meanwhile, there is over a century of proof that they will do literally anything they please to start a war that they want, up to and including false flagging the deaths of thousands of civilians.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +3 / -3

They are quite high.

By what metric?

No it's much higher than 0%. It would mean they're bullshit.

What, nukes? They exist. The threat of using them? 100% bullshit. You’re watching a stage play. People are literally reading from scripts. There are no independent players anywhere in the world.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

Zero percent, unfortunately.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for admitting that you lied about the NSDAP’s policies and that you have absolutely no idea what socialism even is. Burn in hell, kike.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›