-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'm not a liar.

Cool, thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat.

I believe it's flat because the Bible supports a flat earth.

You’d be wrong.

I not shoving it down peoples throat.

Then stop posting about it ever again.

God is all Powerful

Yes.

I don't care what you believe.

Same.

He can create anything he wants.

Yep. He didn’t, though.

You are just under a delusion.

Said the paid shill.

God decides that. Not you.

Enjoy hell.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

BECAUSE YOU SPAM IT HERE, YOU FUCKING KIKE PAID SHILL.

Go live in a goddamned hole in the ground and suck each other off about how an infinite flat plane can magically exist for some reason. Don’t fucking post it on the internet. Don’t fucking expect anyone else to listen and believe. And don’t, whatever you do, dare expect people to silently accept your hoax as being real without fighting back. You’re worse than the Qult, and that’s saying a hell of a lot.

Burn. In. Hell. You’re a liar and you have no power here.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +8 / -4

Who cares? The holocaust didn’t happen. There was no genocide. Zyklon B couldn’t be used for anything but delousing.

by DrLeaks
3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +5 / -2

Reminder that the people responsible for this will never be punished.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, hell. Guess I got lied to. No warts, though.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

I got rid of a planter’s wart on my palm simply by keeping it covered with duct tape for a few months. shrug

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +3 / -3

OY VEY GOYIM IT WAS THE CHINEEEEEEEEEESE

Pathetic.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

[no argument at all]

  • Thanks for admitting that the Earth isn’t flat.
  • Thanks for admitting that you are physically incapable of answering even a single question about your own claimed ideology.
  • Thanks for admitting that you’re too stupid to understand a topic that you yourself arose.
  • Thanks for admitting that you’re a paid shill.
-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

Thanks for admitting that the Earth isn’t flat.

Thanks for admitting that you are physically incapable of answering even a single question about your own claimed ideology.

Thanks for admitting that you’re too stupid to understand a topic that you yourself arose.

Thanks for admitting that you’re a paid shill.

Off yourself.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

You haven’t supported your claim

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

You generated the back pages of another whore.

THIS IS CLEARLY A MARKOV BOT. IT IS INCAPABLE OF USING ENGLISH.

They're literally trying to get funded from the controversy

No shit your “environmental groups” are getting funded by lying, you cocksucking retard.

their books are another subscription

What books, you autistic piece of shit? You’re incapable of replying to the content.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

A load of bullshit.

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

You're linking that crap from second hand information

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

and you keep repeating a book you subscribed too.

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

It isn't fact.

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

It's funny how quick you keep repeating it.

Yeah, that’s how truth works, subhuman queer.

It's not even verified.

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

It came from a counter argument out of a subscription service.

You don’t even know what the words you’re using mean.

You are one dumb nigger.

Thanks for admitting that everything I posted is verified fact.

by DrLeaks
2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, obviously fake. Trump was owned by the ZOG for decades before he even ran. They have no desire to get rid of their current best shabbos goy.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol, dipshit shill calls for the opposite of what he claims to support and expects anyone to believe him

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for admitting you’re paid to post here. Kill yourself, AGW shill.

Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.

“Waaaaa! What about the ice caps!”

They’re not melting. They go through cycles. 1974 had less ice than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what scientists say, whatever you do. Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been growing for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? They show that the past was hotter.

“But the sea level is rising!”

It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.

“But ocean acidity!”

Guess what? It’s also cyclical.

“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”

They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?

“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”

Sorry, there never was any consensus.

“Then why don’t climate change deniers publish papers?”

Because they do (and because papers often aren’t published because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).

”So what the hell is this all about?”

The purposeful destruction of the economy and infrastructure of the Western world and only the Western world.

None of the data supports the existence of AGW.

“WAA! IT’S ONLY UNITED STATES TEMPERATURES!”

Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.

The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.

So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. FUCKING. WARMING.

At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that there has been zero change since modern recordings began. Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, ADMITTED TO THIS.

"WAAAAAA THE DOCUMENT ENDS IN 1995!"

And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.

Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”

“But weather is becoming more extreme!”

Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.

USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.

Not tornadoes. Five (nearly six now) consecutive years of below average events. Not hurricanes. Every single indicator shows they’re not only becoming less frequent, but also less powerful. Not even drought. Hilarious! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, this has been known for a while. It’s global cooling’s fault, after all! Oh, wait… NOAA wouldn’t want you to hear this now, would they?

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven't been proven wrong. You have.

Kill yourself.

You are the same stupid fucking shill spewing flat earth.

Ah yes, the people who have zero data to support their claims are exactly like me, who has proven everything I say with thousands of sources, and not like you, who has provided zero evidence for anything he said.

You constantly cherry pick bullshit.

Never happened. Kill yourself.

None of your links are verified either.

Kill yourself. It’s all peer reviewed.

that has been manipulated.

Prove it, admitted paid shill.

But even in what has been shown on its unverified information, the temperature is on an increase.

Proven falsehood.

It has steadily increased after the Dust Bowl.

Proven falsehood.

It never fell to pre levels.

Fell immediately.

Where is the official reading from the met offices claimed.

Already linked.

It isn't the official statistics.

Direct link to the raw data from the official sources.

Because you're claiming they moved those stations.

No. Read.

Hurricanes again increasing count them.

Proven falsehood.

The other crap you've linked is total bullshit.

Thanks for admitting it’s all true.

The press of some dumb idiot never studied history.

Thanks for admitting the link is correct.

The PDF links I would never touch.

Thanks for admitting you lied and that AGW doesnt exist.

They're bullshit

Thanks for admitting the earth isn’t warming.

Facts you continually deny

You’ve posted no facts. [Kill yourself. (http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html)

Now fuck off nigger.

You’re powerless, admitted paid shill. You will reply again because you will be fired if you do not. I own you. I am your god. Bark for me, you filthy animal.

-4
TallestSkil -4 points ago +1 / -5

GO THE FUCK AWAY, WELL POISONER.

  • Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
  • Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
  • Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
  • Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
  • Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
  • Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
  • Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
  • Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
  • Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
  • Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
  • If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
  • If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
  • A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
  • Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
  • Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
  • The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
  • What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
  • How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
  • Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
  • Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
  • Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
  • If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
  • If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
  • Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
  • How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
  • Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

The website is literally called “IP logger.” I mean, holy shit.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Er, did I reply to the wrong comment of yours (in another thread)? Because you might have replied to the wrong one of mine (here).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›