I’m truly just tired of it all. We have two generations raised to be “activists” from the bench who need to be fucking hanged and replaced with people who have guns pointed at their heads, ready to go off if they violate the original doctrines of the Constitution. Not just justices, of course.
Every transhumanist was jewish. Nothing they’ve said is real.
I just can't see how you win a kinetic war against the most heavily armed opponent in history though.
Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq seemed to manage it.
It would be incredibly, prohibitively expensive to go after everyone that does not participate in their system
They print currency out of thin air. Cost means nothing to them. Release a media report saying we’re all terrorists and their supporters will line up to kill us for free. They’re literally on the verge of doing this already.
especially if there is no direct interference with their plans
Their plan is literally to exterminate every white person from the face of the earth. Us being alive is direct interference.
As long as a parallel system has a complete enough economy to mostly survive without needing to depend on the mainstream, then it would mostly be safe.
Tell that to every nation that tried to exit the IMF system. Oh wait, you can’t; they invaded, killed the government, bombed the infrastructure to rubble and replaced them with puppets…
Reported for spam.
mass noncompliance is the answer.
This means shooting them, though. They’re not going to allow you to “peacefully” disobey their rules.
no evidence he’s missing
oy vey goyim planes don’t exist
Great “article.”
[not even pretending to reply]
Thanks for admitting everything I said is fact. I neither know nor care who you are. Either respond to the post content or fuck off forever, subhuman retard.
Is she gunning down ZOG operatives in the street? No?
Then she’s not fucking fighting for us.
Suggests peaceful noncompliance
So he’s a shill, then. It doesn’t work.
stop paying taxes
You should do this A PRIORI. You don’t pay a fucking hitman to come kill you. That’s what taxes are. They don’t need your taxes in the first place because they spend without regard for inlays. It’s not in and of itself relevant to resistance and does nothing to change their power.
I am not sure what you mean by that exactly. Parchment reference?
The Constitution is just a piece of parchment. It’s meaningless. It doesn’t grant rights. Not in the text, and not in the physical world. It merely recognizes self-evident rights that are logically derived from the natural order. People defend those natural rights. Or they don’t.
And we won’t. That’s all there is to it. “The Constitution will save us!” is psychopathy created by communists to trick half of their false dichotomy into complacency.
After reviewing a dozen of your comments
Wish there was a way for people to see the best, rather than “the most recent”…
buzzwords only paid shills have ever said
all posted positions are either objective falsehoods or diametrically opposite to everything that everyone on this website supports
Project harder. You’re not fooling anyone, kike.
Pieces of cloth don’t matter.
directly implicating Americans’ rights to sexual privacy
Wrong.
and same-sex marriage.
You don’t have a “right” to be a queer.
Few phrases could so aptly capture Thurgood Marshall’s vision of the court’s work as “protector of the powerless.”
Translation: The nigger had no idea what a court even is, and therefore should not have been on it.
Marshall’s work to advance Black citizenship is well known
They were already citizens. He did nothing.
but he also fought for expanded rights for women
I hate him already.
and the indigent
No, he didn’t. How about declaring the Federal Reserve unconstitutional, since it is? He did fucking nothing.
the accused and convicted
The dindu and the nuffin.
adherents to marginalized religions
Translation: foreigners who don’t belong in the US and whom the founders would have executed or expelled.
and those with unpopular viewpoints.
But not anyone he personally hated, of course.
enforcement of constitutional rights “frequently requires this Court to rein in the forces of democratic politics,” to protect the powerless from the tyranny of the majority.
But he didn’t do that at all.
Marshall’s signature accomplishment as a lawyer in Brown v. Board of Education was to convince the court to overturn the doctrine of separate but equal that had emerged after the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision.
So… he did what was possibly the worst thing that has ever happened to race relations in the US, great.
Marshall argued passionately and repeatedly that the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment
And the Founders explicitly said otherwise, so eat shit.
assault on precedent
Burn in hell, communist.
the lack of modern voting discrimination made the act unnecessary.
Neat, and?
weakening the vitality of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which fortifies the separation between church and state.
WRONG. IT SAYS FUCKING NOTHING ABOUT THAT AT ALL. THAT’S AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE, NON-CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION.
Gideon v. Wainwright, which established a constitutional right to a lawyer for indigent criminal defendants.
Those in need of constitutional protection in Thomas’ view are more likely to be property owners
“The only people who deserve to vote, and therefore the only ones with a stake in the survival of the nation.” What’s the fucking problem?
corporations making campaign contributions
Corporations aren’t people. They can’t make contributions, by law.
or gun owners.
“Every man in the nation.” What’s the fucking problem?
Indeed, Thomas claims his position requiring colorblindness is a better path toward full Black citizenship.
And you, personally, say the same thing. what’s the problem?
Marshall always looked at the issue from a different perspective, arguing that access to opportunities was essential not only for the Black students affected but for the nation at large.
He was wrong.
“If we are ever to become a fully integrated society, one in which the color of a person’s skin will not determine the opportunities available to him or her,” Marshall wrote in 1977, “we must be willing to take steps to open those doors.”
“OY VEY YOU HAVE TO DISCRIMINATE BASED ON SKIN SO THAT YOU DON’T DISCRIMINATE BASED ON SKIN! I CAN’T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THIS!”
That turn would be yet another reversal squandering Marshall’s vision of the court.
Good. Burn it to the ground.
The Conversation, an independent nonprofit news site
Not independent.
It was written by: Daniel Kiel, University of Memphis.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
They only way AI kills humans, is if humans are dumb enough to believe in what AI parses together and shits out for them.
So… it’s a 100% guarantee, then.
this judge says
Who gives a shit. Physically kill the judge. Literally millennia of precedent of ownership law proves him wrong. The current laws on the books, even of digital purchases, prove him wrong. Do not obey.
No one will ever believe you.
No one will ever believe you.
But you’re on the same side.
Putin’s “Third Way”
Oy vey goyim, Hitler bad! Anything outside our false dichotomy bad! Also don’t question whether Russia is actually outside the false dichotomy!
We have to stop them. Or, wait until Jesus comes back.
Oy vey, goyim! Do absolutely nothing whatsoever and just wait for Christ!
Earth not flat. Space real. You insane and paid to post lies.
Enjoy your ban.
Your spam isn’t allowed here.
Wow, the stock market is rigged? Who would have guessed?