And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant (Gen. 9:25-27).
For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance. For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all (Rom. 11:29-32).
God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; and hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us (Acts 17:24-27).
Sounds like there's potential for shifting of status and potential for retention of gifts both.
Board readers should be aware that El Al has reportedly the best security in the world because they routinely reserve the right to take you aside and ask a few probing questions. They don't need any TSA or crazy search procedures because they have people experienced at spotting security risks interviewing potential risks all day every day. The fact that he didn't expect this and calls it a "detainer" shows that he's making much book out of what is ordinary for Israel.
That person made a decent connection of all the issues but didn't specify much about causality. By definition that map was enough for one human to consider at one time. It's much deeper than that. However, future explorations of the subject would rely on spadework such as that.
Not too far for this board, keep going. Who is the final boss?
The Hebrews who wrote the Bible in 500 BC intentionally lied about Adam/Eve being the first 2 humans to bury the Lucifer era before them in history.
I've been demonstrating many historical linkages of the Bible with secular history 2000-500. I don't give Lucifer credit of an era on his own witness; the Bible does tell of his history sufficiently. Science has now decided that the progenitors of all humans today shall be called Y-chromosomal Adam and mitochondrial Eve, so whoever were the first deserve those names.
the Canaanites got enslaved by Babylon
Not known to history.
the Moses story which happened in 800 BC (300 years prior)
1539: https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/15HbbQEgDL/special-study-1718-apr-2022-phar/c
Close, and it's a pretty good eye-opener. Actual is given as 29.9791666... degrees to the nearest second (.0002777... degrees). Since an ideal second is defined as 10000km/90/60/60 it is 30.864+ m. The pyramid is 230.6~ m at base (7.5- seconds). So it would appear the coordinate given is within the pyramid compound, but so would a lot of other coordinates because it's too specific to be meaningful. (A ten-millionth of an ideal degree would be 1.111... cm, so the overspecified coordinate only refers to a single square centimeter somewhere on the pyramid, which shifts easily with tectonics. Since the pyramid is north-aligned to the nearest degree, treating it as 230.6m north-south yields exactly 20754 ten-millionths of the idealized degree, and the "exact" coordinates are overspecified by 4 orders of magnitude.)
Now let's imagine that (1) the speed of light hasn't changed in the past, (2) the ancients measured it at 647600 ideal earth circumferences per day, to 4 significant figures, (3) they divided this by 6, three times, to get ~2998, and (4) they deliberately constructed their pyramid at 2998/9000 of the way up from the equator to the pole, or 29.98 degrees north, that exact coordinate would also describe the Pyramid if the geo link is correct to the nearest second. That means, if they intended this coincidence, the odds of picking the right latitude among all latitudes would be only 1 in 9000, or even 1 in 5000 or 1 in 1440 if other assumptions are used, and not the apparent 1 in a billion.
To state the math in a more likely fashion, if they noticed that 647600 is close to the very factorable number 648000, it would be more a matter of starting from the salient 30-degree latitude, and going just far enough to the equator (1/1500 of the distance, or 1/1620 if they want to be closer) to match the shortfall of light in earth circumferences (a factor of 1/1620). Now the early Egyptians did not have a lot of these other math terms worked out on papyrus, but we know the later Egyptians were much better at unit fractions than we are, which is why I frame it that way. It would be much more natural to speak of 1/1620 south of 1/3 north of the equator than any other form, and to say that light is also short of a perfect 648000 revolutions by 1/1620. That calculation does flow through to the 9-digit match to one of the hundred millions of square centimeters that happen to be in the pyramid. The shortfall of the measured speed of light from exactly 3*10^8 m/s is about the same ratio (1/1445) for the same reason. Note that a large number of other ways of making the same correspondence could be done, but if you recognize that your part of the earth controls the area around the 30-degree circle that's the one you'd pick.
Since this is Conspiracies, I note that (a) all these calculations also work on a flat earth measuring lightspeed on earth's surface only; (b) they would also work in a lightspeed decay theory IF what was measured was not exactly lightspeed but a radioactivity ratio that does remain constant; there are ways to get that to fit. I'm omitting much data about lightspeed decay of course, not to mention ....
TLDR: (1) Even if lightspeed isn't constant, the agreed number is physically significant. (2) The number does match to the pyramid in the given notation but only about 4 digits are significant. (3) Using math more the way Egyptians would, this coincidence can flow from two testable assumptions: (a) They measured the speed of light as being 20^2 earth revolutions short of being 3^4 * 20^3 per day (647600 circumferences per day), and (b) They deliberately placed the pyramid with an equal-ratio shortfall of 1/(20 * 3^4) from 1/3 of the distance from the equator to the north pole (29.98- degrees north).
Congratulations! Most people who submit math here are easily debunked, but yours checks out, even if not as spectacularly as this presentation makes it sound.
(Add: I apologize, your comment and my reply are totally off-topic. We should probably continue in c/FreeSpeech, c/CommunitiesConflict, or some forum I am not banned from. Unless you can write a neutral post that is not excessively meta.)
you unfairly banned my previous account for a whole year
Would you like to make a commitment to follow the rules, such as avoiding trolling and critical meta posts?
most people in here never chose you as a mod
Would you like to write a neutral community question? Admin selected the mod based on your prior community question, so I'm not sure it would help.
You were afraid that people might report your activity
Is there evidence that facts are being censored due to content and not behavior?
Or you'll just ban everyone whenever you have a conflict
Why would the founder of c/CommunitiesConflict use banning to resolve conflict?
the honest users will always find a place to speak the truth
Was anyone banned for illegitimate reasons? For honesty?
a Christian is always elected by a majority
What? In a secular conspiracist forum? Should she have insisted she would turn down the position until a clear community consensus arose, even though your and others' community questions got such little interest?
You only became a mod because you talked to a site moderator
Was anyone else forbidden from talking to admin? Should we ask admin why they made their selection?
a real Christian would step down until a real majority chooses you
Is anyone but me advocating for more community discussion?
“Woe to the shepherds who are destroying and scattering the sheep of my pasture!” – Jeremiah 23:1-2
“It is an abomination for kings to commit wickedness, for a throne is established by righteousness.” – Proverbs 16:12
“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.” – Matthew 7:15
Ezekiel 34:10 “This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am against the shepherds and will hold them accountable for my flock; I will remove them from tending the flock so that the shepherds can no longer feed themselves. I will rescue my flock from their mouths, and it will no longer be food for them.”
Zechariah 10:3 “My anger burns against the shepherds, and I will punish the leaders; for the Lord Almighty will care for his flock, the people of Judah, and make them like a proud horse in battle.”
The Bible Came From Arabia, Kamal Salibi, 1985, 1987 ed.
xv: "As a newcomer to the field of Semitic and Biblical studies, I was guided in the initial stages of my research by two colleagues."
1: "I freely acknowledge that my discovery must remain theoretical until confirmed by archaeological investigation .... Of course, in breaking new ground it is likely that I have committed a number of errors, which hostile critics may seize upon in an effort to discredit my conclusions. I sincerely doubt, however, that such errors are likely to be of such magnitude or substance that they will alter my case."
3: "My argument rests almost entirely upon the assumption that the Hebrew Bible has been consistently mistranslated."
6: "I look forward to the day when archaeologists will excavate some of the sites I mention and hopefully provide further evidence that the true land of the Hebrew Bible is West Arabia, not Palestine."
7: "Nearly all the Biblical place-names I could think of were concentrated in an area approximately 600 kilometres long and 200 kilometres wide .... All the co-ordinates of the places involved, as described in the Hebrew Bible, were also traceable there — a fact of the first importance, as these co-ordinates have never really been identified in the countries hitherto believed to have been the lands of the Bible. Moreover, I could not find such a concentration of Biblical place-names, usually in their original Hebrew form, in any other part of the Near East."
9: "‘Jegar-sahadutha’ (Aramaic ygr shdwt’) ... ‘Galeed’ (Hebrew gl‘d) and ‘Mizpah’ (Hebrew h-msph) .... All three names are still carried today by three little-known villages in the same vicinity on the maritime slopes of Asir, in the region of Rijal Alma‘ (Rigal Alma‘), west of Abha (Abha). Their names are: Far‘at Al Shahda (’I shd’), meaning ‘god is the witness’ or ‘god of the witness’, the Arabic pr‘t or pr‘h denoting a mound or hill, equivalent in meaning to the Aramaic ygr; al-Ja‘d (’l-g‘d), which is an Arabicised metathesis of gl‘d; and al-Madhaf (mdp; cf. msph)."
14: "The battle of Carchemish ... took place near Taif, in the southern Hijaz, where two neighbouring villages, Qarr (qr) and Qamashah (qms), still stand. Thus, I would maintain, the Biblical ‘Carchemish’ is certainly not the Hittite Kargamesa, now Jerablus, on the Euphrates, as is traditionally believed."
23: "In [Beersheba] whose name features prominently in the patriarchal narratives of Genesis, and whose origins must therefore go back at least to the late Bronze Age, archaeological excavation has revealed on the exact site materials dating from no earlier than the late Roman period."
26: "Ideally, the full text of the Hebrew Bible must be so analysed, but this involves work for more than one lifetime."
26: "The fact that the Hebrew Bible relates the history of the ancient Israelites in West Arabia does not mean that Judaism had no base in Palestine in Biblical times. It did .... There are clear Biblical hints regarding the growth of a strong Jewish community in Palestine, starting perhaps in the tenth century B.C. ... The reconstruction of the early Jewish history in Palestine is not possible from these texts, nor indeed from any other records so far available."
51: "Kraeling, p. 80 ...: In late Roman times there was a district Geraritike, evidently so named because it was composed primarily of the old Gerar territory."
53-54: "The site of the Biblical Gerar in Palestine has not yet been satisfactorily identified, and no place there continues to carry anything resembling this name."
54: "Msrym denotes any of several locations in West Arabia, including the village of Misramah ... or that of Masr."
55: "Strabo reports ... Gallus reached a place called the ‘Seven Wells’ .... Philby noted the existence of Shaba‘ah."
60: "There is no Gerar near Gaza, in Palestine. Among several which are found in Asir, however, one (al-Qararah) is the Gerar of Genesis 20 and 26 and 2 Chronicles 14, and another (any of four called Ghurar, al-Jarar, Ghirar or al-Qararah) is that of Genesis 10."
WP: "Tel Haror is generally accepted as the site of ancient Gerar. Nevertheless, some other places in the vicinity, between Gaza and Beersheba, have also been suggested."
63: "In the field of Biblical archaeology and its related discipline, palaeography, there is ample opportunity not only for error, but for perpetuating it almost indefinitely."
64: "It is wrong to draw historical conclusions on the basis of inconclusive archaeological evidence."
68-69: "The ‘Moabite Stone’ (the name itself is a misnomer) was set up in Qarhoh (qrhh) by Mesha, king of Moab (ms‘ mlk m’b) - so the inscription on it says .... The Qarhoh in question is apparently the present-day Jahra (ghr), in the area where the stone was found."
WP: "The Mesha Stele, also known as the Moabite Stone, .... was discovered intact by Frederick Augustus Klein, an Anglican missionary, at the site of ancient Dibon (now Dhiban, Jordan), in August 1868."
69: "Mesha describes himself in the inscription as not only king of Moab, but also as a dybny, i.e., as a native of dybn. Dibyan (dbyn) today is also a village in Wadi Adam, not far from Umm al-Yab. So far, readers of the ‘Moabite Stone’ have assumed that dybn is the present village of Dhiban (dbn), in Transjordan, north of where the stone was found. I would suggest, however, that this Dhiban was called after the old Dibyan of the Hijaz after Mesha and his followers arrived to settle there."
72: "The Amarna place-names only make a collective fit in West Arabia. The interested reader may care to examine a table of thirty such names, identified one by one by location."
76: "By now, I hope the reader is willing to concede that there may be sufficient evidence to justify at least a reassessment of the hitherto universally held belief that the events described in the Hebrew Bible relate mainly to Palestine. My next task is to establish the Arabian setting of the Hebrew Bible as a whole, hoping to convince the reader further .... I intend ... to show how this Tihamah is actually the Tehom mentioned in more than thirty passages of the text of the Hebrew Bible."
WP: "Tihamah is the Red Sea coastal plain of the Arabian Peninsula from the Gulf of Aqaba to the Bab el Mandeb. Tihāmat is the Proto-Semitic language's term for 'sea'. Tiamat was the ancient Mesopotamian god of the sea and of chaos. The word appears in masculine form in the Hebrew Bible as təhōm (Genesis 1:2), meaning 'primordial ocean, abyss'."
76-77: "Hayam (hym) ... denotes porous, sandy soil unable to retain water, that is to say soil which remains ‘thirsty’ .... In Arabic, the name of the West Arabian coastal desert should have been Hayam. Its actual name, Tihamah, is a survival of the Biblical Tehom (thwm)."
77-78: "Tehom makes the best sense, wherever it occurs in the canonical Hebrew Bible, as the old Semitic name for the West Arabian coastlands which are called today Tihamah."
78: "The mistranslation here is that of the Revised Standard Version, hereafter RSV .... 1 He will bless you (ybrkk) with the blessings of heaven above (brkt smym m-'l), blessings of the deep that couches beneath (brkt thwm rbst tht), blessings of the breasts and the womb (brkt sdym w-rhm) (Genesis 49:25b). 2 Blessed by the Lord (or by Yahweh) be his land (mbrkt yhwh ’rsw), with the choicest gifts of heaven above (m-mgd smym m-‘l), and the deep that couches beneath (m-thwm rbst tht) (Deuteronomy 33:13b)."
79: "One finds that they actually involve not ‘blessings’, but definitions of the territory or territorial claim of this tribe: 1 He shall settle you (ybrkk) in the Rakkah of Samayin from above (b-rkt smym m-‘l), in the Rakkah of the Tihamah of Rabidah below (b-rkt thwm rbst tht), in the Rakkah of Thadyayn and Rahm (b-rkt sdym w-rhm). 2 From Barakah shall be his land (m-brkt yhwh ’rsw), from the Miqaddah of Samayin (m-mgd smym); from the ridge (m-tl); and from the Tihamah of Rabidah below (w-m-thwm rbst tht) .... I concede there could be a play on words in each of these two definitions of the territory of the Joseph tribe .... In the two passages just cited, the Hebrew ybrkk (see note 8) can mean both ‘he shall settle you’, and ‘he shall bless you’."
80: "Yet the fact remains that the two ‘blessings’ of the Joseph tribe, in Genesis and Deuteronomy, do cite place-names, and hence yield a sense that is concrete. Whatever figurative sense might have been intended by punning, it must be regarded as being of secondary importance, if any."
86: "The event is reported in the standard translations as follows: The waters coming down from above (m-l-m‘lh) stood and rose up in a heap far off (nd ’hd h-rhq m ’d) at Adam (’dm), the city that is beside Zarethan (srtn), and those flowing down toward the sea of the Arabah (‘l ym ‘rbh), the Salt Sea (ym h-mlh), were wholly cut off; and the people passed over opposite Jericho (yryhw) (RSV)."
87: "Joshua 3:16 must be retranslated as follows: The waters coming down from al-Ma‘lah stood, they rose up in one dam extending from Wadd, at Adam, the city that is beside Raznah, and those flowing down west of Ghurabah, west o f al-Milhah, were wholly cut off; and the people passed over opposite Rakhyah."
92: "Msrym ... is rarely used in the Hebrew Bible to refer to Egypt, as commonly assumed. Where it does not refer to Misramah near Abha (see Chapters 4 and 13), it refers to Masr, in Wadi Bishah, or to Madrum (mdrm), in the Ghamid highlands (see Chapter 14). The Biblical ‘Pharaoh’ (pr‘h), as will be suggested later, was not the ruler of Egypt, but a West Arabian god."
93: "Certainly, a ‘Pharaoh’ tribe, called the Far‘a (pr'), is still to be found in Wadi Bishah today, carrying the name of the ancient god or chiefs of the region."
95: "The Jordan (also h-yrdn) where Naaman of Aram ‘dipped himself seven times’ .... could only have been a stream or pool of water. In this case, the term yrdn derives from the same Semitic root yrd."
98: "In Arabic, whd yields the substantives wahd (whd) and wahdah (whdh, with the feminine suffix), meaning an ‘area of flat, low-lying land; ravine’, while the Biblical yhwdh, from yhd, must have been an ancient Semitic topographical term carrying more or less the same meaning."
100: "Pashhur (pshwr) ... is today clearly the oasis of al-Harshaf (hrsp), in Wadi Habuna, north of Wadi Najran."
108: "Altogether, of the 130 recognised place-names in the Ezra-Nehemiah lists, which I have correlated with those West Arabian villages cited above, the identification of only a few remains uncertain. What is perhaps even more important, however, is that no more than a handful of names have been identified with locations in Palestine (in Simons, only ten) .... The onomastic proof is so overwhelming that it seems hardly to warrant archaeological substantiation."
That's about halfway through so I'll leave it there for now as a quote list without significant analysis. You might guess my first impressions from my selections. However, my first note is that you're moving from an Egyptian apologist to an Arabian apologist (if you use too many sources partial to Islam you might get suspected of Islam; you're on the most skeptical site on the internet, doubt it). My second note is, as before, that Salibi is quite the literalist, upholding the existence of all the Biblical peoples, just putting them in Asir in Arabia; so it's hardly compatible to use him as evidence that Abraham and Moses didn't exist. It appears you've shifted the goalpost from your initial implication, "Did Abraham or Moses ever exist? perhaps they're all made up for the story", or from your rather contradictory acceptance of both positions, "Moses and the tribes (Israelites) were Arabs from Yemen .... [AI:] There is no proof of [Abraham and Moses] existence outside of the Bible." If your purpose is to debunk Judaism (and perhaps Christianity) by saying it was all Arabian, that doesn't debunk any miracle or claim other than geography, which is not relevant except for some Zionists. So I'm still unsure of your endgame. But still skimming the text.
Well, that makes a bit more sense, though you first stated it ambiguously enough that it didn't. So the theory is that "Katie Johnson" was deliberately released to pressure Trump, with the inference that the goods were indeed available to Netanyahu, and the withdrawal of "Johnson" was a tactical acknowledgment that Trump was in submission. And then you imply that the Musk-Bondi releases are another phase of the same.
Not sure how that works as a narrative so I'll talk it out. This was Apr-Nov 2016. The public appearance of Jane Doe was cancelled Nov 2, and the lawsuit withdrawn of her own accord according to lawyer Lisa Bloom Nov 4, right before the election. So clearly Norm Lubow, who admitted arranging the lawsuits, was motivated to fight Trump's election chances, and his team changed tack suddenly. Your theory would then be that Bibi had leverage and needed verification that Trump would remain on track and did not fully verify that until the election was underway, and Lubow worked for him. The alternate theory would be that he didn't have leverage and Lubow worked for the anti-Trump coalition and knew they didn't have it, and their bluff was called. Or, Lubow worked for a third party that did have the goods and was the true blackmailer, not US or Israel; but that seems defeated because there would be no reason for an anti-Trump blackmailer not to use the standard Oct-Nov surprise methods when they were already well front-loaded to do so.
Since this is about Epstein, one potential test is to see what the files reveal about Epstein's 1994 travels, when Doe alleges 4 Manhattan incidents; they might reveal either gaps, or matches, or alibis, or nothing. Matches or alibis might also be countered on the theory that Lubow did have access to Epstein's itinerary, and Trump's, but did not have access to blackmail, and so the accusation might have been tailored to the knowable itinerary without being the truth.
Taking it off Bibi personally, though his office, and his agency the Mossad, are certainly top suspects, if any power could blackmail Trump and hasn't, then it's not impossible, it's just so complicated that it takes careful working out. Say you're Philip Dru, you've got a great blackmail ring and Obama is in office, you know it can't last forever and you have a plandemic lined up as a chaos event for your Great Reset, where plan A is you really do kill 90% of humanity under President Clinton and her husband, thus burying much of the aggregating risk of the blackmail. Say you have a backup plan in your patsy the Donald, you don't care which of the two becomes president because he can serve as plan B, and in that plan you are willing to sacrifice many world leaders, maybe a hundred, who are currently greased skids for plan A but who are expendable because you can "always" raise up an equal army to what you lose. In plan B (which happened), you cause Hillbilly to self-submit, you declare an era of good feelings, you release true rumors of a pedo network so you can milk its nonconviction for a decade, you use all possible means for protecting the ignominy of Trump from being detected even though the blackmail tape and its chain-of-custody evidence exists in your SCIF alone somehow, you engage the movie narrative where people think the Biden years were a necessary tactical exile, and you deliver unstinting power to the American people for 5-8 years to prove your dedication to justice and the rule of law. (Despicable Me glances back at easel with sudden nervous doubt.)
Now that theory and even its last clause is not unthinkable. We might even then argue that "Johnson" was merely the public notification that Trump didn't have the power to prevent plan A, but only the cabal whom I call "Dru" did. So (though it takes great gymnastics for me) I might accept that theory as tenable. The ultimate proof, of what a system is, is what it does, and so time will tell what the Trump system continues to do (though we have 5+ years of evidence). It just seems that the no-blackmail story requires less gymnastics, and is consistent with US military objectives as a separate power to Dru.
In either case, it is my duty to expose the truth alone, and so as always I remain provisional about Trump. If he does well, he will be approved, and, if he does evil, he will be rejected; and the judgment will be made upon his whole course. Meanwhile I engage my duty scrupulously.
Nope, there was nothing about a rape video played on national TV, only the 13-year-old "Katie Johnson" who has not been proven to exist.
Ritual ended Feb-Mar 1946, Trump born 1946-06-14, Abramovic born 1946-11-30: https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1AR0LXOlPv/the-1946-aliester-crowley-moonch/c
The 12 year old child video was broadly advertised live on all news stations months after trump came into office.
Not credible. Maybe I'll look into it.
Cold turkey on taxes historically gets people in trouble after 4-6 years because of the timeframe on IRS's assessment powers when someone abrogates the right of self-assessment. It is absolutely essential to deal with credible allegations that you earned income as early as possible if you didn't earn income. Common law may well sweep this away in the next 4-6 years making cold turkey more palatable; but under common law we still have the duty to learn enough regime law to swim with sharks.
Yes, Rome passed the Caesar on to both Russia (Csar) and Germany (Kaiser), where it was forcibly taken by America (Czar). For details, search "Chronology" at c/Christianity.
We've been answering it pretty well here. Dark matter and dark energy have no evidence and don't exist but are invented to patch up math errors in BBT. When you correct invalid lightspeed assumptions as needed, as newly shown last month by the lensing of Supernova Ares et al., using a plasma origin model and accretion theory under SED, the mass math works correctly without any epicyclic fudging (and with no uncertainty). Let me know what you want to know specifically.
I did say it has limited use. But learn what nonfalsifiability means. I can put unity at the beginning as a source, or in the middle as a bridge, or at the end as a resolution, and it would be rationalized wherever I put it. It's useful to put unity at the end, but it's also useful to put it anywhere else. See what I mean? It's not about typing monkeys. "Just approach it with an open mind."
It's especially difficult when dealing with someone who loves one version of it and doesn't care about another. Anyway, the one God is the source of them all, so you'll get to see him in everything soon enough.
That baby was Trump.
I told you twice, your timing was irreparably false. It was more likely Marina Abramovic. Do I need to link it for folks?
videos of him in the island killing a 12 year old girl
Haven't seen, please elaborate.
Meanwhile, the Reptilians behind this ... show have splintered into many groups and are eating each other alive in a Civil War involving many factions.
Always have been.
They all admit that they won't pay on April 15 live on social media.
Can be done legally, but people must responsibly research how. I answer questions on this.
New Fun is posting on densities and I answered more there. What makes most sense is that this is Yet Another aeon list that is no different from either Valentinus or the Zohar doing the same. They're useful to a point but make no falsifiable predictions about the world. What kind of nonfalsifiability is there in a statement "the sixth density is unity"? Well, of course it is, because you defined it to be so and as soon as you stop it isn't.
My link is written to allow falsifiability because the interaction of 10D folded models has been mathematically modeled for a long time and predictions and tests can be made. But if Moses de Leon says "Crown (keter) is the one on top, unless it isn't", what kind of talk is that? Does that make sense to you?
Voted you up, then looked at the context and am Mrex-bumping you up with a comment.
wouldn't you question if perhaps Pam Bondi is the puppet on the end of the strings held by an evil entity?
I do question it. Yet, legally she is responsible and accepts that responsibility. If she chose that responsibility as the lesser of two evils, she is responsible for not seeking the good. Evidence for the puppetry is worth considering on all sides.
My extended theory is that the Trump administration is not 100% unfriendly to the former or latter cabal, with a combination of proper and misplaced mercy. The current steps often play into the hands of the latter cabal and require us to be more diligent than we were in exposing the former. They will be recognized by greater pattern matching, for which we now have much greater capacity as sovereign individuals. A quibble about 2 names out of 305 will be too small a pattern to be important.
I started warning people about House's work about 20 years ago; I just named him earlier today (click my name). Here I added that his father got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance so he was well placed, and continued to be so into the 32nd-degree administration. Certainly the cabals in all ages contribute patterns to be matched. But most of the pattern matching we do here is epicentral rather than central.
At any rate, (1) Christians serve Jesus, (2) within that Americans serve the Constitution that names him Lord of the year 1787, (3) within that Bondi is "bond" of/by the EFTA and interprets it administratively. No cabal, spirit, exousia, or confederacy can gainsay that because it is authorized straight from Jesus. It can only be twisted or driven off course. For instance, objective data might falsifiably show that Bondi cheated in her interpretations and spin-doctored the results. But evidence indicates this administration put many man-years of labor into preventing that from happening, i.e., the list is objectively defensible. If one is going to pin more Epstein linkage on Olmert or anyone beyond what the files show, it'll need to be frog research rather than admin evidence.
Add: Let's consider the current status as it informs us of the latter cabal. The former cabal invested trillions in control and has had billions in losses since. The amount of effort required to unmask it led a powerful state actor (presumably the US military) to determine that its best path was to allow a selected leader to be exiled for 4 years for the plan to succeed. If we were to question that datum, the alternate idea would be that the actor and the cabal cowrote a narrative where it only looks like progress on unmasking is happening but the actor eventually releases 3 million pages of evidence and yet nothing earth-shaking is really in the works. In that complicity narrative, the arrests and executions would be perfunctory and minimal and would merely be bit-part sacrifices where the cabal allows its own to be eaten while it carries on business as usual. In the actual war narrative, the difference would be that the arrests and executions clearly demonstrate the end of a cabal and not a transference, that the behaviors such as trafficking are markedly abandoned, that American individual dedication to justice contributes to a continuing state of self-maintenance against the risks of abandonment of potential victims by the community via its overcompensating oscillation toward individualism.
That would give us a test rubric for what actually happens and how much it favors either of two poles of a scenario. More important, it informs our role as sovereigns in contributing to the prevention of satanic abuse in the future in local and global settings. Between America's actions as government and its actions as sovereigns, we must be Jesus's hands and feet to the abused. When he returns he will show which of us have been his adopted body in the absence of his natural body. So part of "occupying until he comes" involves testing admin pronouncements with some capacity for criticism; but defeating the cabal complex for all time requires committing to pursue truth at all costs, and an imbalanced focus on one or two details, especially those already naturally imbalanced by prior trends, is much less helpful than direct propagation of testable truths via facts and logic.
Obviously Bondi interprets the law administratively.
I have no problem with all kinds of world leaders being linked, Norway already arrested their leader. I have no problem exposing all degrees. Feel free to focus on Olmert et al. with public revelations. But a list has to have a cutoff or else a million occurrences of "Donald" will be held probative. Evidence that Bondi's list is imbalanced is easy to come by, as is evidence that it's balanced, I'm surprised nobody's published such an analysis yet.
Good questions. Let me first separate one question out: Feel free to pick on individual Jews and Jewish organizations, because that is one purpose for this forum, picking on anyone who conspires evilly regardless of race. It's very easy for an objective person to do this without being collectivist or judging the innocent (e.g. the children of a race) along with the guilty. For that reason, people who don't are easily identified as nonobjective.
Again, my take on where to trust history comes from the fact that I made an irrevocable commitment to Jesus, even knowing that he's identified as Jewish. Only he can revoke it. What he says about the Hebrew Scripture is my rule. But I've never needed to fear truth because the truth has always backed up his claims. So I'm happy to look into details and I'm motivated to consider any evidence that I could be wrong, because I am committed to all truth. If Jesus should fail me, that might conceivably be him revoking my commitment, via demonstration of his impotence; but he has always revealed himself as potentate.
Yes, population demographics are a much more important field than realized. A quick unchecked quote comes up: "The total population, they say, was of old about 7 million and the number has remained no less down to our day" (Diodorus Siculus, Historical Library 1.31.8). Modern estimates are a bit lower. Recall that the "Israelite" exodus officially included a mixed multitude of non-Jews along with descendants of Israel. Though the nomadic-community influx of Jacob's family could have been almost 10,000, to get to 2 million would have required conversion as well as birth. Though many were Egyptians, this group were required to consent to Moses's laws and to be circumcised, and the entire polity were counted as "Israel" regardless of heritage, because all were naturalized equally; and the desert wandering cemented this identification and rooted out rebellions. So this number is not immodest.
Since Ramses does have archeological evidence of sudden abandonment by Semite dwellers, this implies that there was a massive population hit via the Hyksos expulsion, even on Manetho's numbers. On the above I'd be comfortable with 30%, while 60% would not be impossible, and 15% could be defended by conservatives. If you read Ahmose's boasting about how he arrived at a devastated region and took over, unifying the people, it's no surprise. Look, Scored itself has had attrition of 95% in some regions and 60% in others, and is still going strong; people do it. Did you know 8% of the population of Nicaragua, which might be 30% of the men of fighting age, entered America this past decade? That's a pretty statistically significant exodus too. I don't think that comparing the largest estimate of Israel's population and the smallest estimate of Egypt's population and claiming contradiction would be sustained, because it admittedly uses two different counting methods. Apples to apples there is no problem.
you expect there's going some kinds of remains like pottery or weaponry or you know, stuff
There's nothing regarding Exodus
What is the difference between exodus and expulsion then?
The inception of Judaism and the stories of Abraham, Isaac, Joseph and Moses happened in Arabia and Yemen.
I said I'd look into that. There's another source I'd heard recently on similar claims that I want to consult. But, takeaway, most of these sources admit Abraham and Moses were real (just misplaced), which contradicts your initial claim. So pick which one you want to defend.
a Bible (Septaguint) cunningly tampered with
This lacks evidence. We have the original and translated text. There is no alternate manuscript tradition by which tampering with thousands of words would have been a sustainable theory. When you look at admitted document tampering by the Inquisition, by contrast, all kinds of evidence shows what happened and what was original.
you go on and keep believing them
I worship exactly one Jew. When he happens to agree with other Jews, that means those other Jews aren't lying on that point.
Dr. Ashraf Ezzat ... indeed may be proud of Egypt, that doesn't mean he would make things up.
Medical doctor Ezzat isn't lying, but he is being dramatic. He's saying Egypt has no "pharaoh" when he knows very well and admits that Egypt had a "pr-aa" since the 20th century BC. That's a semantic quibble to increase hits and purchases. On the argument that Egypt has no Israelites, I'll look into it, and yet his sources claim the Israelites back to Abraham's family were indeed still very real, which means the Bible isn't lying even if we interpret its geography wrong. Similarly, Breasted's math is likely based on the same atheist althist invented in the 19th century as if closeted Babylonians came up with the name "Mose", one of the most common Egyptian names but only of a millennium prior. (Let me repeat that list for my own records: Ahmose, Amenmose, Dedumose, Kamose, Ptahmose, Ramose, Thutmose. Several repeated often, and maybe more names exist. But none after about 1000 BC.)
So the sources aren't proving what you infer they're proving. If there were a real challenge to a Christian worldview it would be worth considering (which is why I'm taking the Asir hypothesis with more time), but these are not significant and have been ably dealt with by the existing historian community.
Random encouragement meta.
It is so much better to see new faces chiming in, to see almost all posts and comments be on point and inspiring in their idiom.
It is so much better not to see 10 pages of insults covering 24 hours, so much that you have to guess how many downvotes to give and where to apply them to not trigger the algorithm. I will repeat that the #1 beneficiary of this platform feature IMHO was u/DresdenFirebomber, #2 u/JosephGoebbel5, though one might suspect they should be reversed.
It is an incredible tell that both those names have found their way to the Wild-West c/rdrama, which had an ignominious founding and fall that need not be renarrated. Why would both arrive at the same abandoned exile location unless they are paid to troll each other?
Despite one or two kinks in negotiating mod team policy versus community interpretation, we have a great mod team and primary representative now, and the forum is flourishing so well that I can't keep up, in a good way instead of a bad way as before.
The ordinary flak you are getting (and I and others) is normal for a community that can hardly agree on anything because it is founded on respectful distrust. The best means of resolution of that tension is to press on doing what is right and to continue learning, as getting sidetracked by flak is its purpose and is wholly unnecessary. Quick trials, public executions.
It is so much better that things that u/NeoOne would have asked for are now happening and the revitalization I and others asked for is underway. He may not recognize it but that's his loss and fomo.
There are other improvements I've already forgotten.
Now, let's all keep building it to continue to be so much better.
Nine days' wonder.
Why do you believe the highpriests who are proclaiming 300,000? What if it's actually 6,018 and God has them all? I have the receipts.
Every time I've tested this claim the Bible has been proven original. Even when it admits summarizing other known records.
Your wish is granted, you can.