1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

But before that, you answered to my question with "I don't care".

This action is disrespectful.

Lol, ok mr snowflake. It sure triggered you.

Anyway, leave me alone I don't want to talk to you.

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, I am inclined to believe the shooting was a real assassination by the Hidden hand. Not so much because they were threatened by Kirk, but because they want to stir shit up and get the rightwingers riled up for a civil war.

Their end goal is always a bloody revolution or a war and they always finance both sides. All they truly care about is spilling as much blood as possible because they are Satan's spawn. They hate people more than anything because we bear the image of God and He chose us for salvation and eternal life in Him.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you study gnosis?

There are limited starting positions when it comes to metaphysics and epistemology and I already know what they are. He only needs to state which one are his and how they relate together in a coherent and logically consistent worldview that can explain and justify fundamental concepts like truth, meaning, laws of logic, morality, knowledge, etc.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Stayed for the ass though

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said you're probably not intelligent, which is a challenge.

That's called sophistry. You were being a smartass. I don't waste time with lying sophists who twist their words and the meaning of what they say.

Go to Church and speak to a priest about your spiritual problems.

Goodbye.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was based on his own words though and I have good reason to believe it is correct (unless he disproves me). It being subjective doesn't mean it's not objectively true.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, the kikes want a racial civil war. It's all a setup for another one of their bloody rituals like all the wars and revolutions they start. The do the opposite of distracting - they build the tension up and it's going down in a few months. The next 5 years will be hell on Earth and 2030 will be the reset which will "bring normalcy back".

When you know how they operate, it becomes boring and predictable.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those who repented and became Christian.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm guessing what his worldview is based on what he writes here. If I've made wrong conclusions I'd be glad to hear him explaining his worldview and how he justifies the knowledge he has.

The "why" here would be his justification and unless he states it clearly I have to guess it. The thing is there are no infinite positions to take and it can be narrowed down to what I said.

That's subjective.

That's redundant. All beliefs are subjective by definition, because they are property of the individual mind (that doesn't mean the thing being believed is subjective though). We are limited by our mode of being.

10
SmithW1984 10 points ago +10 / -0

And who is behind Ukraine and Antifa? It's always the jews and their hidden hand of course. They are bloodthirsty murderers. There is a reason Meyer Amschel (Rotchild I) was called the Great Assassin.

https://x.com/GarbageHuman24/status/1965903417173581899/photo/1

6
SmithW1984 6 points ago +7 / -1

Shit is going down. Just as many predicted, they are ramping it for the winter.

Btw, notice how much different this hit was than the fake psy op attempt on Trump's ear. When it's real, they never miss just like with Lincoln and the Kennedys.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Makes no sense. According to John 1, the Word is Christ, the second person of the Godhead. He is a person, not an attribute or an abstraction..

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can justify what I said above. I'd say it's an objective assessment and not a subjective belief.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Basically he believes Christian ideas about God are dogma forced by man-made institutions to control people, while his spiritual gnosis is his own and somehow not influenced by various contradictory ideas and that he escapes dogmatism because the beliefs are made up (rather compiled) by him.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Way to steal my arguments and think you're insightful. Do you want to compare the insults you made to those I made? Let's do it:

You started the whole thing by calling me "not intelligent", then I called you a "dumbass" - call it quid pro quo.

Then I said "you were a dick", which you were because insulting someone out of the blue is considered a dick behavior. You called me a "smaller dumber dick" (makes no sense because responding to an insult with an insult is warranted, even if stooping down) and went on about me being disrespectful (cry as they strike you behavior) and my upbringing (projection).

Then you started writing your essays full of insults: "jackass", "tiny, little brain", more parent stuff. This was followed by my reply, containing zero insults, where I explain my perspective.

To this you doubled down with the ad homs about how fragile irl I am. Notice I never made any direct insults about your personality. My insults were calling out your behavior here and now but not making conclusions about your character. I never did the feminine psychologizing thing you constantly do.

Then I followed up with a good faith response again with zero insults or jabs. Your reply was more civil than usual too but you ended sounding full of yourself as if you were owed an apology and I was the one who started the insults. This blatant gaslighting didn't sit well with me and I called it out (no insults again other than pointing out I stooped to your level by responding with insults, which is an objective statement).

This caused you to fly off the handle calling me "a cruel, vicious animal", "a rabid dog", "dumb", "gullible idiot", "evil". But I have to quote the last part because it's absolutely psychotic and deranged:

Satan can go on vacation with how well you react to people... I still pity the ones that know you in real life... Assuming you haven't killed them all already... Vicious, rabid dog, you... Go chase a bone, you abomination.

You seriously need help dude. Anything I said after that is completely warranted. This is as bad as it gets. What could even warrant such language? Maybe some despicable crime?

Can you at least step back as you read this recap and realize how unhinged you behaved in our little exchange here? Do you consider that proper Christian behavior and even worse - a way to behave towards a fellow Christian? Idk what demons you have and I hope you get rid of them through prayer and repentance. Lashing out at anonymous strangers on the internet won't help you. It just feeds your anger and pride.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

But with all your insults and snowflake behavior, you have proved that my words are true.

Projecting much? You're crashing out, dude. I don't even have to reply - you only embarrass and contradict yourself further the more you insult me.

I know you don't have time to read my long comments, because I know you're stupid.

Smart people value their time and don't waste it reading drawn out pedantic bs. A skim-through can do. Not that you'd know that. Only midwits think writing long comments full of tautologies is a sign of intelligence. You are more concerned with sounding witty with your ad homs than saying anything meaningful.

I really blame your parents tho... They never cared about you. That's why you have no respect and you act in this way...

More projection. Do you consider yourself well brought up the way you lash out at people for no reason at all? You're a sad person really.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lolicon is pedophilia. It sexualizes underage girls. It's literally named after the character of Lolita that is abused by her step-dad, who is a pedophile. Google refuses to show images of "lolicon".

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

and ya, I gpt too. The texts are not first hand account of Jesus healing people, creating food, etc. there should be lots and lots more.

You're moving the goalpost. You said Jesus was not a real historic person and there were no accounts of Him outside of the Bible. I disproved that and now you make the argument to be about miracles.

God, Jesus, religions are too good of tool to self manage populations. You haven't considered that? Every you believe was a set up to manage your region of this prison?

That's a psychological report and it has nothing to do with whether Christianity is true or false. You are basically presupposing it to be false which is begging the question. I can say the exact same thing about any other belief system like materialism or non-traditional spirituality (which is in fact heavily promoted by the NWO - look up SRI's paper Changing Images of Man or the writings of Aldous and Julian Huxley, H.G Wells and many others; then there's the new age and the hippy movement, burning man, eastern religions and philosophies which align well with their agenda, etc). Anything can be a tool for control. Like for example sex, money or power. Does that mean those are made up too?

How do you knows what's true? Same as I, faith in your source. I still need faith that the experiences I have with my connection to my soul, the feeling of warmth, love, knowingness, truth, is real. I don't fully understand where it comes from, does that mean it's God? No. Do I consider if it's the devil hiding in disguise, sure. I have tested everything to the next of my ability and found truth more than all my years as devoted Christian.

I have a coherent worldview that can justify knowledge, reason, truth, meaning, free will, morality, the soul, etc. I'm not sure how any of these concepts makes sense in your wolrdview, what binds them together and gives them universality and yet somehow you're pretty adamant God doesn't exist. Cool, where are those things located then and how do you know they exist? Because you feel like they do? Are they just in your mind? Well maybe all you're feeling are chemical reactions and meaning is an illusion we evolved to believe so that we could live and not fall into nihilism.

Btw I called the "spiritual non-religious" position you take new age because it is a product of the new age movement. I don't mean you hold the same beliefs as other new agers, because as in protestantism (which you were part of), there isn't a unified doctrine of the new age because the point of it is to be individualistic - to conceive of you as god or the ultimate spiritual being (in protestantism it is you as your own pope basically because interpretation of scripture is up to you aka sola scriptura).

But the common ground in the new age is that everyone is on their own spiritual journey and general hostility towards traditional organized religion (mostly Christianity) which is seen as limited/oppressive/controlling/manipulative and stands in the way of the ultimate truth about reality (the tool of control narrative which was made popular since the Enlightenment by jewish, communist and masonic authors who sought to destroy the old Christian world order).

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've red quite a lot about Gnosticism and its refutations by the early Church fathers.

Nothing new under the sun - same old ancient heresies popping up throughout history.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, not from the history channel, thanks for dismissing another human, very "Christian" and indicative of the state the Church finds itself in today.

Who told you calling blasphemous lies and falsehoods out is not Christian? Have you red how Jesus handled the pharisees? Of course I will dismiss your antichristian lies - this in fact is my duty as a Christian. I love when atheists teach me about my own faith.

But let's look at your belief system. What's wrong with dismissing you? Aren't you just a meat sack of chemical reactions according to your worldview? How did you determine humans have value or dignity and are not like the other random clump of cells produced by the evolutionary process?

The Gospel of John was not written by John for instance, almost certainly written by Ephesus in AD 90-100, (50 to 60 years after the events)

Ephesus is a city, dude. It is believed that John wrote it in Ephesus. At least learn to copypaste your gpt answers correctly. You have no clue what you're talking about.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of those mentions jesus. They all talked about Christians. Ticitus talks about the fires being caused by people who follow Christ, but never talks about anything Christ did. There's no record of Christ performing meracales.

Dude, this is so low tier. You can literally prompt Chat GPT and see that you're wrong. Idk where you get your atheist talking points from but you need to check the info before regurgitating it. Atheists are liars like their master.

  1. Flavius Josephus (37–100 AD)

A Jewish historian who wrote Antiquities of the Jews.

Mentions Jesus twice:

The so-called Testimonium Flavianum (Book 18, ch. 3), which describes Jesus as a wise man and teacher, and notes his crucifixion under Pontius Pilate. (Most scholars believe later Christian scribes edited this passage, but a core reference to Jesus is considered authentic.)

Mentions “James, the brother of Jesus who is called Christ” (Book 20, ch. 9). This is widely regarded as authentic.

  1. Tacitus (56–120 AD)

A Roman historian who wrote Annals (around 116 AD).

Refers to “Christus” who suffered under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius, and mentions the persecution of Christians under Emperor Nero after the Great Fire of Rome (64 AD).

  1. Suetonius (c. 69–122 AD)

A Roman historian who wrote The Twelve Caesars.

Mentions disturbances among Jews in Rome during the reign of Claudius, attributed to “Chrestus.” Many scholars think this could be a reference to Christ or early Christians.

  1. Pliny the Younger (61–113 AD)

A Roman governor who, in a letter to Emperor Trajan (c. 112 AD), described Christians worshipping Christ “as a god” and discussed how he interrogated them.

God is what they use to hide our spiritual connection to ourselves, how you connect and what you will learn is different than everyone.

This makes no sense. "Our spiritual connection to ourselves" is incoherent new age gibberish. It's all circular and self-referential. What if you're delusional? How would you know what is true spirituality and what is false if the only standard is whatever you feel is true? Have you never wholeheartedly believed in something that you later realized was false? This is the same thought pattern troons people use to convince themselves they're the opposite gender.

Believe what you want and suffer the consequences. God created us with free will for a reason. I know very well I won't convince you through reason and argumentation.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure He did. He was like "You gotta feel my vibe, man. We're all energy and the universe consciousness, we're all one. The world is an illusion, dude".

I love Burning man hippy Jesus.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Away from Christ is the truth. Christ is a Jewish psy op. You got it backwards.

Zionists jews push atheism and anti-christian propaganda to the goyim. Read the Protocols. They are behind new age theosophical movement too (what you call "my own spiritual path"). Jews are the one who never miss a chance to mock Christ and to spread disinfo among the goyim (like the ridiculous lie He didn't exist). I can prove it to you easily: Jews control msm and entertainment industry and everyone can see how antichristian pop culture and media is. If you haven't figured that out, there's no hope for you.

Most people at my church didn't know what it meant to support isreal, just like they don't now. People are easily brainwashed. Knowing the truth comes with Peace, confidence, health, awareness, and not living under their deception.

That's because your church is a protestant zionist cult and has nothing to do with the apostolic Church Christ established historically.

Sorry to break it to you, but there is no actual evidence that Christ ever existed in any historical record besides biblical records which, of course, are no better than Jewish fake news

Of course there is but such knowledge is inconvenient to you and you prefer not to research and gobble down jewish propaganda instead like a good goy. Remember - the pharisees and the sadducees (modern day rabbis) were hard at work deboonking Christ even when He was among us. They continued their efforts in the next centuries and are more viscious than ever in our modern talmudic antichristian NWO.

Here are some 1st century ancient Roman historians who wrote about Jesus as a person:

  1. Flavius Josephus (37–100 AD)
  2. Tacitus (56–120 AD)
  3. Suetonius (c. 69–122 AD)
  4. Pliny the Younger (61–113 AD)

I have my own relationship/connection to truth/religion now

Your connection to truth is jewish propaganda and unsurprisingly it all boils down to an appeal to your own pride (you being your own god who grounds Truth - the ultimate lie of Satan). You are a lost sheep but God can always find a way to bring you back. Don't loose hope. I was like you once.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›