Yoga was made as a bunch of poses done in service to false gods. Whether you believe they are bad or not, you are still practicing something dangerous to yourself, and weird. Yoga = YOKE-a. Don't let demonic "yokes" get put on your back!
"but muh excerises!!" Don't be lazy. Invent new and useful positions that have NO occult/pagan meaning. Try different excersises. Eat right.
Does anyone wish to elaborate? Or prove me wrong on any of my statements?
Through divine revelation which was preserved throughout history by His Church.
Word concept fallacy. Yes, Christ translates to "anointed one". The prophesized Messiah of the OT named Christ is a particular person. Here's what you did: "Cyrus is king but Christ is also king - they must be the same thing". In typical gnostic fashion you collapsed the contextual meaning of the word which led you to wrong interpretation.
This is why you need a tradition of interpretation, because your mind can made up whatever it feels like when you read the Bible by your own in your closet, thinking you've acquired special gnosis through spiritual pathways. This leaves you confused and being overtly skeptical of everything that supposedly came from outside sources (exoteric), ignoring the glaring absurdity of your inner enlightened epiphany (esoteric) which is only backed up by your feeble deluded mind (which you believe to be an illusion btw, so there's no "you" in the equation).
Of course, your "epiphany" didn't really come from within you but you've red this gnostic new age garbage elsewhere and made up some idiosyncratic belief system that borrows from many sources which you happened to like - it's a philosophical pick-and-choose all-you-can-eat buffet. This is exactly what you do with the Christian tradition. You pick narratives and ideas that appeals to you and discard the rest. But the Christian worldview is holistic and can't be subjected to reductionism and piecemealing. While gnosticism and esotericism is ancient, this new age form of gnosticism is a very modern, individualistic and consumerist approach to worldviews. This is what makes it so appealing to the fragmented, uprooted, ahistorical and confused individual consumer in todays society, who is desperately craves truth and meaning in this clown world.
The result is a fragmented and incoherent mess that only makes sense to you and is not verifiable and proven in any way - why would anyone care for your individually-tailored system when anyone can do the same and get their own tailored system that is similar, yet different and made to match the tastes and preferences of the individual consumer? You reject objective universal truth in the person of Christ who is God. Great, so why should I care about "your truth" at all when I can have "my truth"?
Hope you read this with an open and critical mind and think about it. You said there are many possible perspectives right? Try this one.
Every one of those claims is justified within the system and is dependent on it. They don't exist in a vacuum - all facts and data is interpreted through a paradigm (Thomas Kuhn). I don't have to prove separate claims if I can prove the truthfulness of the worldview itself. And I can do it through the transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG).
Again, how do you know that? Was that information given to you during your NDE? If so, how do you know you weren't told a lie by the entity that told you that?
And you believe your notion of what/who God is is not man made? Tell me this and be honest: did you come up with your belief system all by yourself in a vacuum through your NDE or did you read a bunch of man made texts and pick and choose different ideas and opinions about God?
But why is communicating that a problem? Aren't we all just projections of the mind of God? There shouldn't be meaningful distinctions then because "me" and "you" is just an illusion, right? Whatever you know and understand also applies to me. Why do you insist on talking as if you are not me and I am not you? You're playing into the illusion. Our whole argument is basically God arguing with himself, isn't that true in your worldview?