Agree.
Stop it.
How?
Tell us some specific actions you would have taken...
Oy vey...following taken from https://heart.bmj.com/content/85/5/499
Acute myocarditis may be asymptomatic and present with a benign subclinical course. The natural history of symptomatic myocarditis varies from early death from multisystem failure (fulminant myocarditis) or ventricular arrhythmias, to complete recovery or long term evolution to dilated cardiomyopathy.
Does not sound fun at all IMHO
So wait...does this mean that if some people hypothetically put the aforementioned in situations where the subjects will be required to perform intense exercise because of a certain situation things may happen?
Is this what I read?
Word...always worth fighting for something you believe in.
And hopefully you will not die fighting but prosper and thrive.
We are still hypothetically in November 2019. Nothing has happened yet...
I assume you are young(ish).
Humanity has not changed.
I hope this answers your question.
Admittedly I agree with your theory of paid fear porn pushers or hopium vendors. All of them click whores
So staying in your country (US) and not relocating. Interesting. Bullets and guns are proly still available, right?
We agree.
So what would you have done differently, irrespective of the poor words I used to describe this hoax?
Just answer the question if you wish bro.
I am not a communist.
If you wanna come up with a better word to describe a contribution from many individual thinkers go ahead and suggest it so I can enhance my vocabulary.
Thanks a bunch
It's good you brought this back. So where do you think we are currently?
I have news.for you. The white hats have been abducted by aliens. All of them. We are on our own now fren
The woman was vaccinated on Aug. 26 and died on Sept. 7.
I thought she was then unvaccinated per CDC definition?
Need link to article please?
The only good socialism is a dead socialism
It is shit like these that make us a laughing stock to the Elites
Thats gay and.shit
Right to start with...the senior author is also the editor of the journal. The editor of a journal has the ultimate power to decide if a paper is published or not. You can see the bias right there.
Secondly, this is a open access journal which means that even though there is a peer-review process the authors have to pay to get the paper published. The benefit is that the paper will be available to all (public domain with no paywall), and the authors retain the copyright of their work. The disadvantage of this model is that there is financial interest in publishing papers and there have been criticisms of their scientific content.
To balance matters out on this occasion the publishing house is Elsevier (probably the major publishing house of scientific material) and the impact factor of the journal is not insignificant (4.14) as seen here https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Toxicology-Reports?cf_chl_jschl_tk=pmd_RsOysJ1g_CN9Q4sZ_mONapLFWbKLH_NCSA_PCsAeCwU-1633202010-0-gqNtZGzNAjujcnBszQhl
NB: I did not comment on the scientific content of the paper but be ready to defend it when these criticisms arise if you use it with "academics" and their like.
So you do understand what is wrong with this study, right?
But we will have Amazon drones and we will be happy
Why do they guard the entrance?
Otherwise (religion excluded) I agree with your scenario analysis.
God does not care.
Sounds as a legit plan.
Do you mean like Moderna and Pfizer stocks for example?