Was reading this because it was a reference in wikipedia under the page of M C Piper. And he is reported to have said as early as 2003 that the Elites were working on an "ethnic bomb".

March 11, 2003 According to the Zayed Center Web Site, the American anti-Semite Michael Collins Piper presented a lecture in which he claimed that the Jewish conspiracies for world domination described in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the infamous anti-Semitic forgery, are "not a theory but a real fact." He described President Bush's policies as deriving from his "Christian fundamentalism" and the President himself as a "classic fanatic Zionist." He also claimed that Israel is developing an "ethnic bomb" that will "eliminate the whole Arab race." https://web.archive.org/web/20040404020109/http://www.adl.org/Anti_semitism/zayed_center.asp

Another instance where I have see this is the latest Bond movie, where the villein uses a virus? to target specific genetic markers on specific human subgroups.

Btw, previous Bond movies has as their themes, terrorism being used by powerful forces for business purposes to manipulate the markets or take out competition, or pass a certain laws; another theme has been that of global surveillance; another has been that of billionaires acquiring large surfaces of land in latin america in order to monopolize water supplies etc etc... You can all see the analogy of what was happening IRL with what was portrayed in these movies.

And now we had COVID, which was manipulated in laboratories who knows what for what specific purpose.

And finally we discover the news that USA had multiple biolabs in Ukraine where they were experimenting on pathogens.

So, pls post any other instance where this stuff appears.

Was watching this documentary called Spaceship Earth from 2020. As detailed by the subtitles I have extracted below, Steve Bannon at that time working for G Sachs, was made CEO of the project.

Now the interpretation the documentary makes of the events, is as if Bannon or his masters wanted simply and only to conceal data about greenhouse effects and global warming. But my suspicion is that this is just a cover or as others might call it a limited hangout. The real reason I think is that the elites sent Bannon in there to take the data from the event, in order to limit the awareness of the public regarding the impossibility of recreating Earths Environment on Moon or Mars, for example. (Not even talking about the issue of lack of gravity and the consequences that has on the human body). This ties very well with the fact that Musk is being propped as a "dissident", or sympathetic to conservative pov (when in reality he is not) and being involved with "space exploration" which imo is really SPACE DECEPTION. I dont know what the ultimate goal is, or would be, but my impression is that humans, and humanity always needs something to hope for... like a religion. They have different concurrent religions. One is the UFOs, one is global warming, one is space exploration. People who believe in retarded miracles accomplished by a half Egyptian Horus half Greek Cynic called Jesus are declining in nr, so the elites always have new mental tools to control the population and direct their work and thinking where they want...

Another thing that came in mind was that NASA also claims to have accidentally lost telemetry data from the Apollo missions. Very convenient.

For context, I was always skeptical of Bannon and also am of the puppets he pushes, like Posobiec and other imbeciles. But I definitely understood beyond a doubt that he is not on our side the morning of the Capitol Hill protest. During all the morning I was watching him live on his "War room pandemic" and he was hyping the event saying "good things, big things will happen". And ,the days before, pushing people to go to the event... Btw Trump did the same, he told people to go to the capitol - after he delivered his speech - but he didn't go there himself.

---

1658 01:39:51,124 --> 01:39:54,494 They continued to pay me to collect data

1659 01:39:54,528 --> 01:39:57,030 that we thought was going to be the foundation

1660 01:39:57,063 --> 01:39:59,766 of this new discipline of biospherics.

1661 01:40:01,568 --> 01:40:06,472 So I was completely involved, all the way until that day

1662 01:40:06,507 --> 01:40:08,775 when the marshals showed up with Steve Bannon.

1663 01:40:12,178 --> 01:40:15,148 [uneasy music]

1664 01:40:15,181 --> 01:40:22,122 ♪ ♪

1665 01:40:30,163 --> 01:40:31,765 ‐ The management team of Biosphere 2

1666 01:40:31,798 --> 01:40:34,735 has been locked out of its offices and jobs.

1667 01:40:34,768 --> 01:40:37,838 ‐ Texas billionaire Ed Bass, who bankrolled the Biosphere,

1668 01:40:37,871 --> 01:40:39,039 has obtained a court order

1669 01:40:39,072 --> 01:40:42,442 <i>ousting six managing officers</i> <i>of the project.</i>

1670 01:40:42,475 --> 01:40:44,845 Among those booted out: Margaret Augustine,

1671 01:40:44,878 --> 01:40:46,713 the company's chief executive officer,

1672 01:40:46,747 --> 01:40:49,215 and vice president John Allen.

1673 01:40:49,249 --> 01:40:55,121 ‐ After some... intense meetings...

1674 01:40:55,155 --> 01:41:01,695 ♪ ♪

1675 01:41:01,728 --> 01:41:07,100 It was decided that the relationship should...end

1676 01:41:07,133 --> 01:41:12,138 as it‐‐as it had been. It was very difficult.

1677 01:41:12,172 --> 01:41:13,707 ♪ ♪

1678 01:41:32,593 --> 01:41:33,760 ♪ ♪

1679 01:41:37,263 --> 01:41:41,535 ‐ Ed was under pressure to stop the bad press

1680 01:41:41,568 --> 01:41:45,606 and to make Biosphere 2 more conventional and profitable.

1681 01:41:47,808 --> 01:41:51,512 He brought in bankers and Wall Street types

1682 01:41:51,545 --> 01:41:56,349 who really were focused on short‐term profit and loss.

1683 01:41:56,382 --> 01:41:58,885 ‐ John Polk Allen sent a letter to Ed Bass,

1684 01:41:58,919 --> 01:42:00,521 the project's financial backer,

1685 01:42:00,554 --> 01:42:03,223 because he's afraid the focus of the project

1686 01:42:03,256 --> 01:42:05,225 is changing from scientific research

1687 01:42:05,258 --> 01:42:07,193 to making money.

1688 01:42:07,227 --> 01:42:10,396 ♪ ♪

1689 01:42:10,430 --> 01:42:15,902 ‐ Steve Bannon came out of Goldman Sachs,

1690 01:42:15,936 --> 01:42:19,239 and Ed made Bannon CEO.

1691 01:42:19,272 --> 01:42:21,508 ♪ ♪

1692 01:42:21,542 --> 01:42:24,511 ‐ Most of the incredibly important data

1693 01:42:24,545 --> 01:42:26,279 from Biosphere 2

1694 01:42:26,312 --> 01:42:30,416 was destroyed or locked up somewhere.

1695 01:42:30,450 --> 01:42:32,686 It is a scientific crime.

1696 01:42:32,719 --> 01:42:39,526 ♪ ♪

1697 01:42:39,560 --> 01:42:41,862 ‐ Why? Why?

1698 01:42:41,895 --> 01:42:43,296 Why were they doing this?

1699 01:42:43,329 --> 01:42:46,633 What was this all about?

1700 01:42:46,667 --> 01:42:48,535 I was very dubious

1701 01:42:48,569 --> 01:42:52,939 whether or not what was happening was legal.

1702 01:42:52,973 --> 01:42:57,210 I continued to work under Steve Bannon.

1703 01:42:57,243 --> 01:42:59,212 I figured that it was very important

1704 01:42:59,245 --> 01:43:01,648 to capture what was going on.

1705 01:43:01,682 --> 01:43:03,550 ♪ ♪

1706 01:43:03,584 --> 01:43:06,486 I put the tape recorder in my underwear

1707 01:43:06,520 --> 01:43:09,389 because I was concerned that somebody would try to find it.

1708 01:43:40,754 --> 01:43:42,889 ♪ ♪

1709 01:43:42,923 --> 01:43:46,392 ‐ The power of this place is allowing those scientists

1710 01:43:46,426 --> 01:43:49,563 who are really involved in the study of global change‐‐

1711 01:43:49,596 --> 01:43:52,298 this actually allows them to study and monitor

1712 01:43:52,332 --> 01:43:56,737 the impact of enhanced CO2 and other greenhouse gases

1713 01:43:56,770 --> 01:44:00,440 on humans, plants, and in animals.

1714 01:44:00,473 --> 01:44:02,776 ‐ The focus was really one of space travel.

1715 01:44:02,809 --> 01:44:04,678 We refocused it to the study of the Earth.

1716 01:44:04,711 --> 01:44:06,880 [melancholy piano music]

1717 01:44:06,913 --> 01:44:08,815 ♪ ♪

1718 01:44:08,849 --> 01:44:12,719 ‐ If Bannon has denied climate change,

1719 01:44:12,753 --> 01:44:15,756 it is not because he is not smart enough

1720 01:44:15,789 --> 01:44:19,693 to see that there is climate change.

1721 01:44:19,726 --> 01:44:21,662 He's doing it for another reason.

1722 01:44:21,695 --> 01:44:25,799 ♪ ♪

1723 01:44:25,832 --> 01:44:28,802 It's particularly excruciating

1724 01:44:28,835 --> 01:44:30,937 because I know how smart he is.

1725 01:44:30,971 --> 01:44:35,676 ♪ ♪

1726 01:44:35,709 --> 01:44:37,944 ‐ The takeover of Biosphere 2

1727 01:44:37,978 --> 01:44:41,615 is what's happening in the world now.

1728 01:44:41,648 --> 01:44:44,350 Wall Street banker types,

1729 01:44:44,384 --> 01:44:48,955 the people just interested in short‐term profit and loss,

1730 01:44:48,989 --> 01:44:52,559 push out the innovators and destroy the world.

So, I totally didn't know about this, and tangentially discovered it from another unrelated search.

So this guy was arrested and is serving more than a decade, 13 years, in prison because he was in possession of firearms, illegally. (I can't find anything to explain to me, why would he get not registered firearms if the USA has the 2nd amendment? Or was he planning on returning to his "normal life" and not getting caught after he executed his supposed "plan"?)

But the most interesting thing is, that after reading some msm articles about it, there is ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION on how the police suspected and started to investigate him.

They do mention his search history and internet activity A LOT, they know what he read, when, where and how much he read.

Then I read on a comment section, on Knowyourmeme... https://knowyourmeme.com/comments/4676519

For those of you keeping track, he was seen taking Tramadol at his work desk. That led to a search of his desk, which led to a search of his home. Per the court documents, the firearm purchases were made from February 2017 to February 2018. It's a real stroke of luck both that he sat on that arsenal for a year without using it and that an unrelated thing actually caught someone's eye.

So, someone suspected him and the "investigation", or better and more correctly to say, the FACADE investigation started from his use of a legal painkiller during worktime.

Does this sound like a total BS lie to you? To me it does.

I certainly, am not associated, nor do I sympathize with him, nor do I sympathize with the degenerates that "caught" him, and I HAVE NO DOUBTS, ZERO, NADA, that the government through google has extended surveillance programs and algorithms that automatically collect data on individuals, that then are judged by agents. From this point they start to think how can they entrap the individual, knowing full well how he thinks and what he thinks. So to successfully end the "investigation" they just need to find a plausible excuse to get the search warrant. But they have preemptive knowledge, through data collection, and if it weren't for the necessity to keep alive the FACADE of legality, they would throw in jail all of the ppl who oppose the government or the current way of things in one way or another.

Also, don't even try to clean your browser search history, that wont solve anything. They collect your data, upstream. And pretty sure google and their AI has algorithms that are able to compile access from different devices and different social media into one single profile for an individual.

NOTE. Again, I am interested how the investigation started. Because to me it seems they are data collecting (no doubt about this, old news), and from time to time, when they need a publicity stunt, or need to promote some agent, they go select a "neonazi" from the surveillance pool and look for ways to "accidentally start investigating" him or to entrap him.

P.S. Would be interesting if anyone who has already read about this, could provide quotes from reactions, in regard to how the investigation started.

R_Hak's notes

from

THE EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON WAR, CONQUEST, AND ALIEN RULE

by Satoshi Kanazawa

Abstract.

The evolutionary psychological perspective implies that women should be far less resistant to alien rule than men, because they have the option of marrying into the conquering group; however, this sex difference should disappear when women are no longer reproductive.

1.2. Ultimate Causes of War from the Evolutionary Psychological Perspective

Chagnon (1997, p. 190) notes that "the Yanomamö themselves regard fights over women as the primary causes of the killings that lead to their wars." Buss (1994, pp. 219-220) summarizes: "Among the Yanomamö, there are two key motives that spur men to declare war on another tribe -- a desire to capture the wives of other men or a desire to recapture wives that were lost in previous raids.... It seemed silly to them to risk one's life for anything other than capturing women." This ultimate reproductive motive behind wars can explain why it is so common for invading soldiers to rape women of the conquered group (Shields and Shields 1983). From this perspective, rape is not an unfortunate byproduct of war; it is its original purpose.

[…] Apart from exogenous shocks like imbalanced sex ratios (potentially caused by, among other things, earlier history of warfare), one social factor which artificially decreases the availability of reproductive women in a group is polygyny. By allowing some men to monopolize many or most reproductive women, polygyny reduces the number of women left available for the rest of the men, even when the sex ratio is roughly 50:50. Earlier studies show that the degree of polygyny increases men's tendency toward violence (Daly and Wilson 1988; Kanazawa and Still 2000); the more polygynous the society, the greater the incidence of violent crimes. Similarly, the degree of polygyny may increase men's desire to raid another group in order to gain access to reproductive women. Now does this mean that EP would predict that polygynous societies engage in a greater number of interstate wars than monogamous societies? No. Modern interstate wars are initiated, declared, orchestrated, conducted, and fought by modern, bureaucratic states, not by men or even groups of men. [...] Polygyny, even in modern society, creates a shortage of reproductive women, and this in turn makes young men more violent and desirous of abducting and capturing women. (It is almost always the young resourceless men of low status who are left without mates in polygynous societies.)

[...] So polygyny would not increase the incidence of modern interstate wars. However, it should increase any other instance of intergroup conflict, initiated and fought by groups of men, at a lower level of aggregation, in a form that existed in the EEA. One such instance of intergroup conflict within a society is civil wars.

2. Implications for Foreign Conquest and Alien Rule

[...] the perspective simultaneously implies that women will not be killed by the conquering soldiers, because they are too valuable, while all men will be killed.

[...] "the response of adult males to a "stranger" female -- that is, a female unknown to the human observers and presumed to be from a neighboring community -- depends to a large extent on her age and reproductive state" (Goodall 1986, p. 493) The stated object of a raid is to kill one or possibly two men and escape. If the raiders can do so without risking losses, however, they may abduct a woman from the enemy village. The abducted woman will be raped by all the raiders, taken to their village, raped by the remaining men in the village, and then given as a wife to one man. She can expect to spend the rest of her life with her new companions (Wrangham and Peterson 1996, p. 67).

Strictly from the genetic perspective, it does not matter for the female with whom she mates and reproduces, because the resulting offspring will always have half her genes, regardless of whether the other half comes from the males of her native (now conquered) group or the foreign (conquering) group. In some sense, females should prefer to mate with the conquering males, because they have proven themselves to be superior on average to the native males (most of whom are now dead). As generations of German, Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese women in the 20th century can attest, human females may sometimes prefer to mate with the conquering males under alien rule.

This reasoning leads me to suggest that women have less to fear from foreign conquest and alien rule than men do. Of course, it is terrible to face the risk of being raped repeatedly by the conquering soldiers, but it could not be worse than the certainty of death, especially since, if they survive, the women from the conquered group have the option of marrying into the conquering group and reproducing with the conquerors, who might possess superior genes. And the conquering soldiers are much less likely to kill the (potential or actual) mothers of their offspring. However, this option is open only to reproductive females.

2.1.2. Results

[… ]that, among the Eurobarometer respondents under 50, there is a large and statistically significant sex differences in the three measures of xenophobia. Men under 50 are significantly more likely to say that they find disturbing people of another nationality (p < .001), race (p < .01), and religion (p < .01) than women under 50, even after controlling for their education. The sex differences are substantively, as well as statistically, significant. Controlling for education, income and marital status, men under 50 have 23-28% greater odds of responding affirmatively to these questions than women under 50. In sharp contrast, the sex differences disappear entirely among respondents who are 50 years old or older It means that, at least for nationality and race, women do not gradually and linearly become more xenophobic over the life course. They suddenly become qualitatively more xenophobic sometime between the ages of 40 and 50.

3. Discussion

The evolutionary psychological perspective on wars suggests that the root cause of all intergroup conflict is the lack of reproductive opportunities for young men, and polygyny,

In their study of the surplus male population (called "bare branches" in Chinese) in China and India, Hudson and den Boer (2004, p. 202) note: Two observations would seem to follow from the analysis thus far. First, high-sex-ratio societies are governable only by authoritarian regimes capable of suppressing violence at home and exporting it abroad through colonization or war. Second, high-sex-ratio societies that are ethnically heterogeneous are likely to experience civil strife directed against minority ethnic groups, which the government (if it represents the majority ethnic group) may seek to encourage. In our view, the first observation holds for China, and the second, for India.

[...] For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age 50. In his 1999 book The Lexus and the Olive Tree, the New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman predicted that the first major war in the 21st century, after the end of the Cold War, would not be fought between nations. It will instead be declared by what Friedman called "Super-Empowered Angry Men," such as, among others, (the then little-known) Osama bin Laden, who would use the power of modern technology, like the internet, email, and cell phones, to mount a successful war against modern states, possibly even a superpower like the United States

[...] From my perspective, there are two points to note in Friedman's predictions. First, the World War III is not an interstate war between nations; it is instead the first global civil war in human history. Bin Laden and other "Super-Empowered Angry Men" do not represent any nation or state, and they need not express their anger through the channels of modern bureaucratic states. Western allies, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, are fighting groups of angry, frustrated men, not other states. Second, the one factor which unites all of our otherwise diverse enemies, from al Qaeda in the Middle East, to Jemaah Islamiyah in the South East Asia, to the Chechen rebels in Russia, is the Muslim religion, and Muslims, unlike members of other major religions in the world, are polygynous. From the evolutionary psychological perspective, it is no coincidence that the first major global civil war is declared, initiated and fought by a polygynous group. Many young resourceless Muslim men of low status are left mateless because young reproductive women are monopolized by wealthy polygynous men of high status.

[...] There is one ethnic group in the world which is significantly more polygynous than Muslims, however, and that is the tribal societies in the sub-Saharan Africa. Accordingly, sub-Saharan Africa has the world's highest levels of violence, measured by interpersonal crimes such as murder and rape (Kanazawa and Still 2000), and the region suffers from a long history of interminable civil wars.

==

Source: https://faculty.washington.edu/hechter/KanazawaPaper.pdf THE EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON WAR, CONQUEST, AND ALIEN RULE by SATOSHI KANAZAWA *Direct all correspondence to: Satoshi Kanazawa, Interdisciplinary Institute of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected].

As per title. I'm planning on building a physical library. I have already started collecting books, but these are mostly non-fiction books that are mostly intellectual, not practical.

I'm looking for suggestions regarding manuals, encyclopedias that have PRACTICAL knowledge to be used in case of internet collapse.

I don't have the resources to buy originals, it would cost me thousands of euros, so I will self print them from pirated pdfs.

Give me your suggestions. Thnx in advance!

Just curious... Any thoughts?

In this manga/anime, we have a bunch of Pirates. Obviously when I was young I though well, how come pirates are depicted as good in here, while IRL pirates are bad. There must be something wrong with this anime.

A few years passed, shit has happened to me, to the world, I see things in a different way now... Plus I have seen more One Piece episodes and well, what do I watch? That there are lots of analogies between what we IRL call conspiracies, and the world of OP.

The consp. that there are reptilian/celestial elites behind the scenes in OP. is a truth. They are called celestial dragons.

Well, the world government isn't good. Earth has some particular/magical regions which only a few ppl know about.

Obviously, the general population is depicted as innocent, but also as imbeciles and weak. Aka blind to the truths...

Any thoughts? Are these things put in there intentionally, accidentally? Does the creator know stuff?

Another question arises, what is the perception of japanese or chinese ppl to the Western conspiracies?