1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

First tell us which system you are referring too, and then prepare for a few dozen follow up Questions.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, all four planes disappeared after impact, but this is fake. Got it.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even though I linked you to a direct image comparison?

Here, look again.

A half blind man can see that they are the same angel.

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

it's been 23 years. And as you have stated, it's all been digitized. Unless you are standing in someone's living room watching a video off of their mini VHS tape, that they have recorded themselves, it's not authentic.

What do you think you are saying here?:

"There was amateur video released recently that was recently digitized, where you can see the planes crash into the buildings. And they are entirely consistent with footage from 23 years ago."

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh no!

Anyways.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

That seems plausible. They always answer in pairs, with 2 up votes to their comments. They're either the same person, or they are butt buddies taking turns on reach around duty.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It could be a doctored video. But no, the angel is not wrong. There are also theories that the planes were added in real time, to match the explosions, which would only need to be done for plane #2. As I have seen ghosting effects and other anomalies in video's of plane #2 hitting the tower.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's Crater Earth theory. Take the flat earth plane, and place it on a massive globe, where we only live on 1/10 the area. corralled in by ice walls. This accounts for discrepancies in both Spherical Earth Theory and Flat Earth Theory. As it's somewhere in between.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is always your default reply isn't it?

  1. Provide false quote, placing words in other people's mouths.

  2. Claim there to be some sort of argument or debate taking place.

  3. Proclaim yourself the winner.

Strange Flex

Thanks for admitting the Earth isn't flat.

???

⇣⇣⇣

"If the radius of the Earth were doubled, the surface area would increase by 8 times. So if the Earth were ten times claimed, the curvature, would drop from around 8 inches per mile to around 4 inches. Thus accounting for both a flat earth realm, and a large spherical Earth planet it resides on."

-̱͞|͞מ͟͞͞פ͟ו͟͞͞ק͞פ͟͞͞ק͞|̊̆ ‡.̗̀́

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've thought about it in the past, while pondering Plate Tectonics and Pangaea. As it is so quickly dismissed, despite the fact that our Earth is claimed to have formed from space dust. Which are two distinct and contradictory claims you are to hold in your mind simultaneously, while agreeing to the currant narratives.

The Lost History Of The Flat Earth: 📺

-1
Questionable -1 points ago +1 / -2

So, you are admitting that all it took to convince you was watching a video. Seems an odd statement. As I too, have provided a video for you to watch.

???

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

Even though there is no plane in that video? Which video? The video in the reply you chose not to watch or reply to. For, reasons.

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

Same angle, same building in foreground:

https://conspiracies.win/p/1995CP3vRJ/plane/c/

What do others here think?

Do I address the fact that there doesn't ever seem to be anyone here, or the assertion of thought?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn't watch the comparison video did you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj8MaZeLBbo&t=20s

Weird how It says check comments, yet no one has checked comments, watched the comparison video, nor up voted the comment in comparison to the thread.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did Not Connect: Potential Security Issue

Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to pomf2.lain.la because this website requires a secure connection.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›