No one can ever prove their claims without an impartial moderator. But this should go without saying.
Are you a u/catsfive alt account? Does the five stand for five accounts?
Is this your red heifer? Does future prove past, when you orchestrate it?
How does one conduct a train versus and symphony?
Do you like Barbra Streisand?
Or have you simply eaten to many grains?
Do you like miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilk?
Ѡ TITIES!!!
Why is he, or anyone else on these forums never capable of proving their claims?
It's simply really. No one can ever prove their claims without an impartial moderator. But this should go without saying.
Unless explaining such concepts to a child. ℅
The topic that you brought up? In my thread about the hubble space telescope? Yes. So strange.
Same can be said about a river. But documents can be written up to the contrary.
Strange that you're sitting on top of this thread, or my user account. Less than a ten minute response time? Honestly, this really isn't that important.
Upon reading the title: *I'm going to see my own name in this screen cap aren't I?
Yep, this is about yesterday...
It was only bait to confirmed paid shills.
OH yah?
This will be my last comment
Not replying to this comment makes me the victor, having proven my main point. Which you yourself have assigned to me. Plus you have agreed to the terms and services of our contract. You now owe me money. For life.
Replying to this comments acknowledges that you are sexually attracted to fish.
I blame you.
Do not reply again.
Nice bait.
Your a funny guy.
We're doing so without even realizing it. Though I personal think it should be discouraged.
*Also, I find reading the title over and over again while trying to click through to the article annoying. *
The history is detailed in that link.
No. As I simply am asking for others input. And I am not soliciting your approval to do so.
You are acting as though you believe yourself to be the arbiter of objective reality.
Do you like that sentence better? Are you through playing dumb? Though arguing semantics? Finished trolling for reactions?
Now coo-dos to you! You garnered a reaction! You are the best troll ever!
The topic that you brought up? Good Question. What are you even doing right now?
I'm not going to sit here and argue with you until the heat death of the universe, simply because you believe that you are the arbiter of objective reality, simply by claiming:
Cameras exist.
Maybe. But it wasn't officially acknowledged or founded until the 20th of December 2019.
Sometimes. Depending on State, county, court system & evidence. But that's not what I'm addressing at the moment.
An actual game has game play. Not reward systems. Experince is not a number that just gives you things. Experience is an actual skill sets that you posses outside of the game. You are rewarded in actual games by being good at game play. Not arbitrary numbers in a spread sheet.
Sorry. I mistook you for a person.
Make your new handle BMX_BOY. Because you back peddle like a bitch.
Here are the only two theories postulated in this thread before you came along:
-
It is my belief, that there are no real photos of the moon from high orbit or any space fairing vehicle that should easily be capable of taking such photographs.
-
This what the Hubble telescope actually looks like https://science.nasa.gov/mission/sofia/
Are you controlled opposition? Are you here to push Flat Earth via the Streisand effect? Is this what a poisoned well looks like? How about this?
Why do you believe everything related to NASA and the cold war?
Sorry. I mistook you for a person.
Make your new handle BMX_Boy. Because you back peddle like a bitch.
Seems obvious when you think about it.
Also that article is a stub.
They have a more comprehensive article on Dark Chocolate than on Cheyenne Mountain.
And what? Start a war of assassinations with Cheyenne Mountain?
Amazing. I made no such claims in this thread.
This accusatory rant and implied opinion of yours on the other hand, has been noted and rejected.
I check the mod logs often. And take note of your reports being rejected.