A question to who don't believe the virus exists: In your theory normal flu cases were mispresented as covid cases, right? So far so good. The fundamental problem I have with this theory is, the normal flu can hit small kids pretty hard, were as covid hardly ever hit kids.
SS: in this artilce the thesis is made that bad reporting about trump was not because of domestic politics bias, but because of geopolitics.
What you guys think? You have arguments that support this thesis? Arguments that speak against this thesis? Or do you have an antithesis?
The military does not make a move as it will create chaos, but "Prepare for economic chaos and possible collapse if Biden’s policies are allowed to persist" and even "Prepare for widespread food inflation and food scarcity under the Biden regime".
Then we have the credible but anonymus sources: "I’m not the one making these decisions, I’m just reporting what’s coming my way from well-positioned, credible sources."
This article claims a lot of stuff but with very low substance. It reminds me of CNN. Evidence, truth? Who cares, the narrative is the important part, and to back it up there are credible anonymus sources.
"we must do our part to publicize our suffering and persecution under the Biden regime." - - > so again in the end it is a battle to form a narrative.
If he is connected with so well informed sources then I suggest to publish the undeniable evidence. If the mainstream media wont cover it than there is an army of patriots who make sure the evidence is seen and heard all over the web.
Also this message is conflicting with gen flynn.
The accusations in the tweet/telegram does not have any proof. So for now its just a wild accusation without any value. All it does is pushing a narrative.
This comment does the same, pushing a narrative.
If mods think its okey to ban such a comment, but its also okey to post a telegram that basically does the same - pushing an unprooven narrative then this is really not a place for free speech.
It's clear that the narrative in the telegram is popular to the mod/this side, while this narrative is not popular. But if not the quality of a message, but the narrative determines if you get banned on this side then tell me, what is the difference between this site and mainstream social media with their factcheckers, other then the narrative?
Always this short twitter messages with big accusations and the claim there is bulletproof evidence but the evidence is hold back by [xxx].
I dont say no way this is imposible, but i do say if you make big accusations then the burden of proof lies on you.
If you dont provide proof, such an accusation is just a tactical move to defame someone or (in this case more likly) to build up an alternative narrative.
The q community can go nuts and sees the number 17 everywhere (reminds me of the number 21). But Q itself is still a mystery. Some stuff he posted kinda fits. But its too good to be true? Maybe a bluff? Think poker :)
Edit: the mainstreammedia lies too and build up a false narrative, what if q just want to build up a counter narrative? Just play the same game. And truth doesnt play a role in this game (only if it helps your narative).
Does the russiagate hacking story sound something like this? https://swprs.org/russian-hacking-nato-psyop-revealed/
Just a little info:
The inauguration made it clear Q was just a larp. Why is Biden sitting in that chair?
It was the community who said it has to happen before the inauguration, not Q. Q said the opposite. Read drop 4822 and 4821
That really is on the level of 1984. Luckly we have timeback machine and co.