Why nobody takes care of these bots in here...
The slave trade is a jewish trade - facts.
But someone JosephMalta - thinks people are getting sick of the spam, while he's clearly downvoted, and the post is very well upvoted...
Unless Joseph Malta is a jewish shill... Only possible explanation.
I have only one link to the demonic ultra religion, which is Kabbalah, link to digital life.
First of all, Kabbalah is basically veiled Satanism. I don't mean to say that Kabbalah is digital in any way. Rather, it leads to the digital outcome we have today.
Secondly, Kabbalah is the most powerful of Satanistic religions - the only one that gives the best fruits to Satanists. And every Satanist eventually gets to the Kabbalah to become powerful.
Thirdly... Read this verse from the Bible:
And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. - Revelation 13:15
Keep in mind that the Beast, the Anti-christ, and the false messiah are the 3 major figures thrown in the fire, never this "image of the beast". So, you can conclude that this image is a construct.
Many consider the "image of the beast" to be a robot, but how can a robot speak without AI?
My theory is that this "image of the beast" is a giant computer, or the origin of AI. It's a construct that "causes" things to happen. It can "cause" robots to attack people, etc. Hense, the relationship with digital age.
The News-Benders 1968 (1 year before big event) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYAke_z3RVU (30-min short movie that is worth the watch, it's important for my point)
P.S.: Notice that I don't directly connect the Kabbalah to digital life, but use it in reverse as Kabbalah is the most effective, and the one taking effect is digital life, so most probably Kabbalah is the most effective cause for digital life. This is an assumption, not a proof. But a very solid assumption, in my opinion.
I would appreciate your thoughts on the matter.
Yes, please get back with that but keep in mind:
-
AI chatbots would easily overwhelm any small group of thinkers.
-
Who would your selected group ignore? How can you tell the difference between a real newly joined human and AI chatbot/shill?
-
What aims are for likeminded people? There are little to none likeminded people in here, while we agree on one topic, we differ on another. And how can we combine our efforts on tasks that we all slightly disagree on? "A house divided cannot stand"
I agree with your point about transparency. Mods actions should be transparent to the community, so they are well understood and they can trust these actions in the future and possibly rely on them.
-
https://conspiracies.win/p/17s5Ran2yH/please-ban-ufreewillofchoice-its/c/ (+30/-15)
-
https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmOGpGT2/is-ufreewillofchoice-mentally-re/c/ (+13/-5)
-
https://conspiracies.win/p/19BGFQ28Bu/why-cant-we-block-freewillofchoi/ (+11/-4)
If the community wants an action being done (these examples provided. I even exclude all of mine...) what mod would provide it?
And how can a useless mod be convinced that they are truly circumspective? I mean that in terms of a very lenient mod, who already allows useless chatbots, to be also useless for the community.
I would personally use the word "weak":
- someone, who can't take the hard decisions
- cannot set rules and follow them
- playing safe, while avoiding troubles...
Weak moderation is all this community had in past time, and if you can't make the hard decisions, when the community wants them, then you're also weak, wouldn't you agree?
Unfortunately, I see you, and one other candidate, take this mod job as an opportunity to be liked and respected. You forget that your duty is to the people in the forum, not your own needs. You would be liked, but never respected.
Out of all the candidates I've seen so far, I can only vote for Graphenium - he's the only one, who saw a true problem in the community, and didn't even wait for a mod to start round tables discussions but did it himself.
In contrast, you want the same position, while showing no qualities than a regular user. Your philosophical approach is not a requirement for a good mod, in my opinion. Good user, bad mod.
I told you my claims would take hours of long comments, while you watching the documentaries I shared freely with you that answer more than half of your questions, will drastically reduce that.
It's efficient, and I told you that many of your current questions are already answered there. If you don't want to watch videos that contain visual proofs, then can you explain why a comment would do a better job in convincing you?
Never said malnutrition btw. I meant that skulls and skeletons can be deformed due to the many years of tons of dirt, or water, being on top of them. In contrast, do you mean to tell me that what you believe is that over millions of years not a single of the neanderthal skeletal examples was never deformed due to the enormous weight over it?
In short:
My claim: hundreds of years can deform a human skull/skeleton. Rock is harder than bones. Even water can deform them through weight, or even petrify them. That's why they are not actual skulls or skeletons, but fossils.
Your claim: Millions of years cannot deform a human skull/skeleton.
I hope now my claims are well-presented rather than just void.
Everything in life has a purpose, and that's God's will. If you were able to go back in time and change something, then you go again God's will, not only that - but you overcome it, which is impossible.
I also see your points but being a satanist is not a proof of changing the timeline, the other 2 sentences are only theoretical.
My theory is that they use anything related to different timelines to convince people that your actions don't matter, if another timeline can do it differently, and God's decisions can be overruled by humans, if they can change the timeline.
The Mandela effect stands on very few examples that illogically lead to a grand conclusion. However, every parallel universe scenario leads to a paradox, not tiny changes in what people remember.
I agree that they are satanists, but even Satan couldn't get even half the angels to follow him... How can we then assume that he can overturn any of God's decisions?
Alright, I know that this person exists, but I was asking for you to provide some of your examples that you particularly happy, if I can say that, so I can review them and share my honest thoughts... I hope you understand that I can look through all his posts -> Look for your comments -> Look if the topic is about Christianity -> And then review them case by case...
I think you'll help us both to review these cases, since you have them in your comments section, and you have the memory of those, so you reviewing them and providing them would be the fastest way possible for this.
No, they explained why. Even though it was a stretch. There is literally no benefit that would come from removing it to stifle discourse, except to help TPTB.
Would you care to share the discussion, please? I've seen a lot of wrong sources and opinions to be convinced that I should check things for myself. I hope you understand.
Also, banning someone is not the only job of a mod. They can also gives strikes, mute, be arbiters in conflicts, etc., etc.
Banning someone is the last resort for a mod, imo. A lot of actions come before the last resort, but if someone doesn't hear reason several times and is damaging the community - they have to be banned eventually. But always starting with muting them first, they just might be in a period with strong emotions and some time off can help them cool off and think rationally again.
How would you like it if someone comes in your heated debate with someone and set some general groundrules, so a normal topic can be followed, and if someone goes over those rules, they should be disqualified from the conversation (again, this doesn't mean banned immediately).
So, considering all this information, do you still believe that having mods is muting? Or do you have another perspective and why?
Ok, how is the Mandela effect proved?
As far as I know it's a theory about paralel universe that seems like a huge stretch to me because some people remember different events in different ways...
So, can we go from there? What is the Mandela effect in your opinion, and what proofs or suggestions have you found that support it?
Wow, I don't even know about that but thankfully that has been dealt with perfectly.
Well, my point is for round tables and focusing our brain power in a combined research instead of every person for themselves.
Our enemy is united... Do we hope to defeat that enemy, while we're divided? Just makes no sense to me..
Your browser is probably outdated or have bad settings, update it or swich to another browser, and yeah, if you have an issue just tell someone, they might have the solution for you!
I'm using brave browser to never see a single ad. I would rather use your workaround than switch to another browser. Again, thank you for that! And yes, I have been saying this in posts where I can't access the video and you're literally the first person in years, who finally provided a solution. Thanks again!
I saved the documentary, I'm already researching evolution and creation and other alternatives, I do not beleive or trust any of these things, honestly no one knows how things started, evolution has holes and the creation hypothsis have them as well
Then I'm glad you saved it, it will clear a lot of those questions for you.
The problem with evolution is for example we have big empty intervals where humans made a significant jump and developped a lot out of nowhere
I would rather you just watch the documentary... There are more parts available if you like this one that go really deep into the holes in evolution. I would rather not explain them in a comment, when a perfect documentary already exist. Technically, it's a lecture but I use "documetary" broadly.
With creation, we have the problem of finding more primtive humanoids like Neaderthals, Denisovans, Cromagnons etc
There are explanations for these tho - just modified skeletons through erosion, weight, termal conditions, etc., etc. Again - the lecture is full of examples.
These are not modern humans and not apes either, they are way developped than apes, we do have thier skeletons also, why do they exist if the current humans are here since the beginning? and why they went extinct? outdated version? just like your browser? no more needed? initial prototypes?
Same reply as above. The lecture is pretty funny too, I'm sure you'll enjoy watching it.
For now I think the truth lies somehwere in between the two hypotheses of creation and evolution, I think it's a guided evolution, someone is guiding it, but it has some "automatic" proceeses to it, so it gives the illusion of the classical ecolution we all know of
Perfect! Watch the lecture with an open mind and let me know what you think.
So, whatever caused humans, it could be the cause behind other sentient races like reptilians as well, it's not about evolution or creation, I don't think this is the main point, the point is: we are not alone
Honestly, that's why I sent you those documentaries... I could explain this case for hours, but you would save both of us a lot of time, if you check those videos and THEN we discuss those topics.
But if you want my persoanl opinion about this after years of investigation,
I would really prefer your years + 3-4 hours of watching those videos that I sent you. I have a lot to say on the topics you raised, and we'll have a wonderful discussions, but these comments are getting bigger and bigger and at some point they will be unreadable...
btw reptilians are very old in folklore, they are not a modern thought, you can find stories about them with mayan and african tribes, they even have instruction on how to deal with them!
That's also in the videos that I sent... How is the devil called in the Bible - That red dragon... And how many other races are in the Bible - satyrs, for example... I will provide you on a lot of information, but you'll help me out if you watch the videos first.
Also, if you have a vision of a dragon/reptilian, how would you know if that's real or a vision? How do we know that we're awake or still dreaming? We can't make that difference really, only when we wake up we realize it...
check out the neurophone of Patrick Flangnan
Quote from the link you sent me:
"To use this technology, you place the sensors on the forehead under a headband."
Sounds like a receiver to me...
So...
But the advanced applications that can be done with this tech are fore more than just the deaf hearing.
I would really like to discuss that with you, but I currently know that they use nanotechnological receiver that is self-assembling tech that requires EM waves to work, hense the 5G towers...
Can you please check if the quote from the link you sent me and review if that's indeed a receiver? Because so far I believe it is, but I want us to review this before we move forward.
Let me be clear - you were absolutely right to do it! Actually, through your comments I noticed that I somehow posted this 3 times.
It just seemed that you were replying to one post, as the 3 posts had the same name... I mistook this as a spam on one post, which was my mistake.
You helped me fixed this strange spam, so I thank you for that. Honestly.
I don't even know what this "request for sticky" really is, honestly...
And who am I supposed to contact without mods?
I was hoping for more action from the users in here... I guess most of you are too fed up to do anything, and I don't blame you for it... I know exactly how that feels...
But if we don't do anything, who will?
I can see your point, but I can also see that you provided no proof of your previous accusations.
Anyway, a mod would help with removing chatbots. Otherwise we would just hate this place and keep returning to it without changing anything... which is borderline insane, imo.
From a psychological standpoint, we just want to be heard... And a lot of us are banned on many places... That's why we return here, where there's no moderation, but also no point in sharing whatever... Just several upvotes that you get and feel heard in the least way possible... But still better than muted/banned/blocked.
So it would be better to fix this place instead of just bitch about it, wouldn't you agree?
Using that logic, then every ideology is a religion.
Even your current one, whatever it is.
Sorry, remind me how Communism was promoting "soul torture" in your statement?
If I were you, I'd check the difference between ideology and religion. I would also check on Communism too in that regard and how they treated religious people... Frankly, if I were you, I'd just research stuff better than that.
So, you incorrectly think that moderation is censorship.
I'm so glad for this because I actually enjoy to see the users in here boiling in their own doom...
I tried to help, but if you think that moderation is censorship, then you deserve what's coming for you. :D
As before, I love commenting on public questions. My history on this topic with Neo is public.
So much that you posted 3 different comments under the same post, weirdo... - https://imgur.com/a/x0pIdt5
So many people downvoted your comment, does that warm you heart too?
And so many upvoted OP's post, I bet that warms your heart even more! :D