1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now they don't. B Laughable. Lies. Bs. They inflate the market. Destroy supply and ruin ratio of demand..end of story.

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bankers.....are mostly Jewish...and a couple of royalty, etc mixed in....but as far as the western world...most are Jewish...so they pay the bank for the mortgage first off...or they go to other money lenders....which is usury......sooo......most don't buy their homes anyways....it's money lending

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm amazed you think that people rent because they want to....sure...like 5% maybe. Lol

Most because they have to....why do they have to?

Ah....because greedy bastards who have homes already bought them....and won't sell them.....but instead rent them....forcing the price to....rise.......and the supply....to fall......not the demand...

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Neither sadly....I would be a very rich man lol

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you even know what left is man? Lmao....found the fool

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

.....you don't understand relative scale of economies....we spend far more here too because of it....and the real rich people (my definition) are scumbags who inflate the cost of living with their welaht so they use it....

As was said back by an old Englishman....

When goods are cheap...money is scarce....when goods are expensive, money flows......the rich want expensive things....they inflate for their benefits...

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

....perhaps they should only buy what they need for themselves......then they wouldn't need to rent them....other would have one already......gee willickers...!

3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

For me it was the realisation that everything is built atop of assumptions and at the bottom the answer is always 'not sure' or idealised.


Science is a methodology but anything suggested by institutions on behalf of science cannot be trusted unless repeated.


I now look at most of the models as 'good enough' for the modern world. But not truth and it's kind of sludge of useful stuff and falsehoods.

The useful stuff is typically split into numerous topics and never actually taught well in effort to make it commoditized. This most noticeable when looking at technicians, engineers, researchers, and institutions.

Everything comes from the top and is presented down to the lower tiers and they are given their own specialist experience. These continue to make it so that the left hand doesn't know what the right is doing at all levels of the scientific establishment.

Engineers can depend on their assumptions. Techs can depend on theirs, researchers in theirs, etc.

All of them are usually slightly incompatible with one another and would cause too many questions if you were to apply it.

They also like to change the units slightly, and make different rules of thumb. All of this is useful at the level, but not consistent across them.

It allows the flaws to hide more easily because people working in string theory never need to apply it to technology. And engineering will not be questioning it, etc.

Same with climate science, geophysics, geology, oceanology etc. They all take in different assumptions and use them to work, but they don't work across the other disciplines and don't see the relationships.

Instead they are told how to interpret and transform between their results and the other specialists.

That is why science cannot tell the truth these days. People aren't practicing it fully. They have removed themselves from the real practice.

5
MindlessRationality 5 points ago +5 / -0

Near the top for sure. These days, it's hunting for the info that's difficult.

I would say I have an unfinished staircase but I can see the top

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would go so far as to claim they are much like water filters.

The flow of the current runs through it and a healthy economy will filter the water without retaining it, but providing value. However, it's retaining water, and causing pools of water to grow stagnant within the filter and occasionally these stagnant pools pass through and ruin the water.....

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. If you get so much money that you are struggling to spend it in your life....you are a burden on society and have robbed it from it's potential.

Everyone deserves some savings as you say, but I agree. There is a number where it stops being good for the world

3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone whose money works for them and uses their money to buy other people to do the work...this includes landlords, bankers, people who live off their stocks, etc... If they don't work, run a business, or operate some functioning economic driver they are rich.

This includes owners who don't operate the business in anyway...franchise owners who don't actually do anything except own....


Exceptions are people who have retired, but they should stay the fuck out of the economy then.

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know that he has other investors. But I am not sure of the specific structure. Btw ... His investment partners tell you all you need to know about musk....he is a immoral criminal.

He hangs with people who gladly murder others....so he obviously doesn't value life. He is a complicit accomplice to murder

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

But how? 44B won't all be loss. And if so....it's not a public company anymore....so privately it does what ... Guts itself? How is that a tax writt off....it's private?

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

See I can believe that, but then the goal is to shift them somewhere. So who profits?

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be a shredder moment....

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its a way of controlling language. If they can associate the word pandemic with Covid then they only have to say pandemic measures and people think Covid. But when they legally act they include all sorts of 'pandemic' measures.

This then makes it hard to talk about because they have turned the word pandemic into the phrase pandemic. Phrases have context that is carried along where as words are single atomic ideas.

For example. They can use the context of the Covid narrative to pass general purpose laws for anything they call pandemic....but as far as they are saying it is always in the context of Covid. So they will subtly pass the law for all purposes without needing to say it to the people who may balk

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

The exploitation is truly next level....they exploit people...wait to short the problem....short it...announce the very issues they have ensured.....then decry any who point fingers back and say no we are the saviour....we need to fix this....here is my NGO for solving this problem...you can donate to it and become part of the solution.....then fund the next problem :D

3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. Perfect example. These smart tools are not great because they broken so easily....and require 'experts' (read gatekeeper)

9
MindlessRationality 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't think they were myth at all...I think they were the original.... civilization.

The reason....is they didnt win the history battles.....and they were wiped out...and likely had their culture either destroyed or claimed....much like roman days.

by DrLeaks
1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I use Yandex for anything political. They are highly controlled but they have pretty standard search....the best part.

Libtards block Yandex from indexing their pages because Russia is bad lol

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›