It's very common look up the 27.5 year depreciation rule. Virtually every property investor uses it, they'd be silly not to.

You will treat me with respect if you want my help.

But we discovered that she still made up to $1 million from it in 2019 despite the fact that she claimed it no longer existed.

This is probably due to depreciation the property. You're able to do this even if the business shut down. The justification is that eventually the asset will need worth $0 since maintenance costs will exceed the cost of the initial investment.

EDIT: Changed word "discussing" to "depreciation"

The article clearly explains this I'm not carrying the water for you

Proof of prior art is usually a successful patent challenge

It's the combination of what's written as well as existing laws defining perinatal that makes the inference accurate.

It decriminalized perinatal death due to negligence. Elsewhere perinatal is defined as to up to 7 days after birth. It's the combination of the prices bill and existing laws that make this inference accurate.

It's literally written there in the proposed bill for the world to see. Why are we still in denial?

He knew.

No way that would be certain retaliatory death. They might use them tactically for area denial. Like: Western Ukrainian:NATO border regions to funnel potential support through areas easier to control. Or, in space to take down GPS.

Maryland, DC, California. Thank God they've been mostly unsuccessful so far but this needs to stop.
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/24/california-introduces-new-bill-that-would-allow-mothers-to-kill-their-babies-up-to-7-days-after-birth/

I think it was though there's been a number of copy cat attempts for instance within DC

I've gone through this already and came to a different conclusion. It's tricky to interpret legal jargon but they are trying to remove penalties related to parental negligence or to harm done by medical providers.

Strange when philosophy meets fiction meets reality... Almost seems intentional.

Lol I'm just paraphrasing the image from the back cover of his book

It's still a voting block more than double his size so there's that

Proposed by Sen. William Smith (D-Md.)
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/09/proposed-law-in-maryland-would-allow-mothers-to-kill-their-babies-up-to-28-days-after-birth/

https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/09/proposed-law-in-maryland-would-allow-mothers-to-kill-their-babies-up-to-28-days-after-birth/

I agree that China will likely devalue. They need to do this in order to create enough liquidity within the yuan to create a competitive petro fiat to USD. Perhaps this is why they are in extreme lockdowns still: demand destruction to minimize price increases as they print

Short term constraints on supply causing prices to move. If these don't relax before the input costs are registered (for example fertilizer normalizing before planting) then these costs get baked into the costs of goods sold

There's also a bill priced in MD to allow abortion up to 28 days AFTER birth 😢

Had to think about this for a few minutes. The FDR correction is probably fine. The assumption that VAERS under reports is fine given evidence. The only real potential issue is this assumption that vaccine rates should predict (ie via a linear model) vaccine fatalities. This presupposes a causal relationship which should be tested prior to using inside a model. What they've done is reasonable just want to see some indication of causality. If they used it to predict future outcomes (or used historic data to do holdouts) that would be good enough for me.

I use 40 as my general rule though I'm sure it varies by condition.

I could see doctors copy and pasting batch from case to case- especially if they don't inow the batch- rather than leaving it blank. Though I could also see Pfizer performing experiments on people so....

I'm not buying it. They're saying there was an obvious error made by refute it using guesswork.