Nah, basic fakery

Yes

The shots were fired from his rifle

So you need to be a doctor to query why having a chunk of your ear allegedly blown off would be accompanied by an immediate cessation of bleeding?

Yeah, don’t think so buddy. Also, why so angry?

If a bullet grazed an upper earlobe causing it to bleed, how long would it take for the bleeding to stop on its own

If a bullet grazes an upper earlobe, causing it to bleed, the time it takes for the bleeding to stop on its own can vary based on several factors, including the severity of the wound, the individual's health, and whether appropriate first aid is administered. Generally, minor cuts and grazes to the earlobe might take anywhere from a few minutes to around 20-30 minutes to stop bleeding on their own, provided there are no complications.

To help control the bleeding and speed up the process, the following steps can be taken:

1. Apply Pressure: Use a clean cloth or gauze to apply gentle pressure to the wound.
2. Elevate the Area: Keep the head elevated to reduce blood flow to the area.
3. Clean the Wound: Once the bleeding slows or stops, clean the wound gently with water and mild soap to prevent infection.
4. Apply an Antiseptic: Use an antiseptic ointment to reduce the risk of infection.
5. Bandage: Cover the wound with a sterile bandage to protect it.

If the bleeding is severe, doesn't stop after 20-30 minutes of pressure, or if there are signs of infection or other complications, medical attention should be sought immediately.

It wouldn’t stop within seconds then? If it stopped within seconds, what might that indicate

If bleeding from a grazed earlobe stops within seconds, it might indicate several things:

1. Very Minor Injury: The graze might be extremely superficial, causing minimal damage to the blood vessels in the skin.
2. Effective Initial Clotting: The individual's blood may clot very quickly, effectively sealing the wound almost immediately.
3. Minimal Blood Flow: The area affected might have less blood flow, contributing to faster cessation of bleeding.

In general, for minor cuts or grazes, it is not uncommon for bleeding to stop quickly if the injury is not deep and does not involve larger blood vessels. However, if bleeding stops almost instantaneously, it typically suggests that the injury is quite minor.

What if a chunk of ear was missing as a result of the wound?

If a chunk of the ear is missing as a result of the wound, it is a more serious injury than a simple graze. The bleeding in such cases is likely to be more significant and might not stop within seconds. Here are the considerations and steps to take:

Considerations

1. Severity of Blood Loss: Missing a chunk of the ear can lead to significant bleeding due to the rich blood supply in the ear.
2. Infection Risk: There is a higher risk of infection with a more significant injury.
3. Need for Medical Attention: This type of injury typically requires immediate medical attention to control bleeding, prevent infection, and possibly repair the damage.

Immediate First Aid Steps

1. Apply Direct Pressure: Use a clean cloth or sterile gauze to apply firm pressure to the wound to help control the bleeding.
2. Elevate: Keep the head elevated to reduce blood flow to the area.
3. Clean the Wound (if possible): If the bleeding is controlled, gently clean the wound with water. Avoid using strong disinfectants directly on the wound initially.
4. Bandage: Cover the wound with a sterile dressing or bandage.

Seeking Medical Attention

• Emergency Care: Seek emergency medical care immediately. Severe ear injuries often require professional medical treatment.
• Possible Interventions: Medical professionals may need to suture the wound, administer antibiotics to prevent infection, and possibly perform reconstructive surgery if the damage is extensive.

Stopping Bleeding

If bleeding stops within seconds despite a significant portion of the ear being missing, it could indicate:

• Natural Clotting: Rapid natural clotting response by the body.
• External Pressure: Immediate and effective application of external pressure.
• Vascular Damage: Damage to blood vessels might have caused them to constrict or collapse, temporarily reducing bleeding. However, this could be temporary, and medical evaluation is crucial.

In any case of severe ear injury with tissue loss, prompt medical evaluation and treatment are essential to manage the injury effectively and minimize complications.

It is unlikely that a wound to the upper earlobe that results in a chunk of the ear being lost would stop bleeding within mere seconds?

Yes, it is unlikely that a wound to the upper earlobe that results in a chunk of the ear being lost would stop bleeding within mere seconds without intervention. Here's why:

1. Rich Blood Supply: The ear, including the earlobe, has a rich blood supply, and a significant wound is likely to bleed profusely.
2. Nature of the Injury: A chunk of the ear missing indicates a more severe injury, which typically involves more tissue and blood vessel damage, leading to sustained bleeding.
3. Normal Clotting Process: While the body can initiate clotting quickly, it usually takes several minutes for the process to effectively stop the bleeding in more substantial wounds.

Scenarios for Immediate Cessation

If bleeding stops within seconds, it could be due to:

• Direct and Immediate Pressure: Applying immediate and effective pressure can sometimes rapidly reduce or stop bleeding.
• Vascular Constriction: In rare cases, damaged blood vessels might constrict or collapse in a way that temporarily reduces bleeding.
• Pre-existing Conditions: Certain medical conditions or medications might affect bleeding and clotting times.

Importance of Medical Evaluation

Even if bleeding appears to stop quickly, it is essential to seek medical attention for a wound of this severity. There can be underlying damage, risk of infection, and the need for proper wound care and possibly surgical intervention.

In summary, while it's possible for bleeding to reduce quickly under certain conditions, it is generally unlikely for a significant wound to stop bleeding within seconds without appropriate first aid.

Also weird how it stopped bleeding in a matter of seconds. In fact, we NEVER see any blood pouring at all. It just appears as is and never changes.

Would a bleeding ear coagulate so quickly?

Why did Trumps ear stop bleeding so quickly?

The Bible itself, including Jesus, already says enough offensive things about gentiles.

Amalek and Esau/Edom

Grant Schapps, Dominic Raab and the Tugendhats of the outgoing Conservative Party are all Jews too.

Schapps was the Minister for Defence. Isaiah 60 says that Israel will inherit the forces of the gentiles (amongst other things). Case in point.

Aah, I had heard of that - just didn’t recognise it from its shortened name

Yes. The documentary ‘Hypernormalisation’, whilst still propaganda and misleading in its own right, is nonetheless enlightening and speaks about Vladislav Surkov creating competing groups within Russian society and then letting it be known that they were Government created and controlled groups - all to bewilder so that Russians can no longer tell what is real and what is fake, what is organic and what is agents provocateurs etc. very interesting

No, be fair. It WAS Operation Trust. I tried to suggest to GAW that the hundreds of thousands of sealed indictments that they were so eagerly watching grow and were so eagerly anticipating being opened might prove to be people like them and NOT hordes of famous and influential people and other child traffickers.

Those indictments have still yet to be opened as far as my knowledge goes.

I get it. It left an indelible impression in real time and it’s the impression that you reminder fondly rather than the fact that you/we were being taken for fools.

I think tptb created the conspiracy purely in order to publicly deride it hard, thereby pushing legit conspiracy theorists evermore to the fringes in the eyes of normal society.

I think this plan is broadly laid out in Cass Sunsteins 2008 paper Conspiracy Theories: Their Causes and Cure.

I’ve never heard of ConPro, so thanks - I’ll check it out

Me? Not so. I believed in it for about 3 months before cottoning on that none of it added up.

I was only ever on GAW and came very late to the party so missed Reddit and/or Voat and 4chan, but what alerted me was the common language they all used, like calling each other ‘fren’ and all those other catchphrases. Also, more alarmingly, they would justify having been mislead by Q by simply stating ‘disinformation is necessary’ ergo, what? You’re ok being lied to by your saviours?

Also, it was incredibly weird that they positioned themselves as the saviours of humanity alongside the US Military and thought that they were somehow on standby to mend the shattered psyches of the masses once the Great big exposure came.

Then Ted Cruz did nothing about the Jan 6 prisoners and it was plainly obvious to me that Trump had goaded them into going, saying he’d be right there with them only to cut and run and publish an obviously pre-recorded video message in the aftermath.

And of course their strong tendency to ban people who raised legitimate but uncomfortable questions.

For a while though it was exciting to think that the wicked elites were about to get their comeuppance. Turns out though that acknowledging their own wickedness via a psy op Pied Piper like Q was just a cunningly ruthless display of mockery and a show of their total stranglehold on all aspects of societies ‘narratives’. And of course that the only opposition they truly have - us the real people - are completely powerless and can be led by the nose through their deception.

Completely unstoppable.

Where does it say mature 8 year olds? I just looked this book up and it says it is the answers to questions from teens

Edit: one of the authors, Yumi Stynes, said she’d be comfortable with a mature 8 year old having a flick through it. They market it as for 11-14 olds though. Still disgusting Queer Theory pedophilic nonsense though

There is such a thing as Abrahamic religions. Those religions who believe the god of Abraham to be the one true god.

Christianity and Islam are proxies of Judaism, created for the purpose of having the world believe in the lord god of Israel and of Israel to be gods chosen people.

If you’re a Christian, all you have to is read the alleged words of so-called Jesus himself and you will have your eyes opened to it.

It’s rabbinic cosplay. The Church dresses up like the Jews of Old because their religion is a branch of Judaism, there to serve Judaism goals of having the goyim worship the lord god of Israel through their daft rejected messiah story which they used to convert Rome and hack the Roman Empire to spread word of their god throughout its sphere of influence, forcing the non Jewish world at swordpoint to abandon their own histories and cultures to instead become Noahides, which you gladly take up.

Islam and Christianity are Judaism for gentiles, there to fulfill the promise of Zion. The lord god of Israel (and Jesus insofar as he even existed) hates your guts if you’re not Jewish and consider you inferior to the Jews and says your lot in life is only to serve the Jews.

Snap out of it.

It’s not tough love. The god of the Bible isn’t the god of humanity but exclusively the lord god of Israel.

He is a racial supremacist god who encouraged ‘his people’ To commit genocide.

Dagon the fish god. The Popes mitre comes from Dagon

You are honestly a vile human. But that’s what belief in the genocidal, egomaniacal lord god of Israel does to a person

But the Israelites murdered the Canaanite children themselves in the orders of god

Deu 20:16  But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: Deu 20:17  But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:

Jos 6:21  And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword.

You’ll need to put some meat on the bones of that final analogy. In what context could you sacrifice yourself for you Loved one’s? Like, throwing yourself in front of a hail of bullets that were otherwise destined for them?

In that case, no you wouldn’t be sacrificing yourself to a god.

However, the Jesus story is fundamentally not that.

Christ doesn’t sacrifice HIMSELF at all. His sacrifice is ordained by his father. Remember, ‘for god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son’ and ‘Father, father, why have you forsaken me’ and

Eph 5:2  And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.

Here, you can see that Jesus was given as a sacrifice TO God.

Rom 3:24  Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Rom 3:25  Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Here, you can see that he was a sacrifice FROM god.

So, God gives his son as a sacrifice to himself for the forgiveness of the world’s sins.

Why not just forgive the sins directly?

Christianity is dumb my man. The mental gymnastics you need to go through to make this retarded concept work is astonishing. And yet, you will impute all manner of nonsense reasoning to do so.

Would you sacrifice your own son to yourself to forgive the sins of your nieces and nephews when it is solely in your gift to forgive anyway? Of course you wouldn’t as that would be insane.

You’ve answered on whose behalf Jesus was sacrificed but the question is who was he sacrificed TO?

When the lord god of Israel asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, it was a sacrifice to him - the lord god of Israel. All sacrifices are offerings to some god or other, so to whom did god offer up his son as a sacrifice?