2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

So what DO you view Trump as?

4
Jacobin 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, what would have been wrong with just exposing the actual detailed plan from the jump and arresying all the would-be genociders rather than create an alternative genocide weapon and supporting charade?

Why institute plandemic preparedness exercise Crimson Contagion ahead of the go-live date of COVID?

Q-tards are idiots.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

He looked like he was reading someone else’s words to be fair. And without context we don’t know for what purpose

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then you would have to contend with the fact that, if you did make such a post, it might be forum slid into oblivion or deliberately deprived of engagement.

There’s also the fact that this very site in which you would be making this post is already a Skinners Box.

If media of all types is in the grip of such a stranglehold and subject to algorithmic siloes then what chance is there?

I would recommend creating your own substack maybe, if the fruits of your labour would take a lot of effort and editing. That way it wouldn’t be lost down the back of the Conspiracy consumers armchair!

You should do it anyway - even if only for your own sake as it would help clarify and solidify your own understanding and connections.

I agree that there is a much bigger picture afoot, Anne much more subtle and devious and longer term tricks in play

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t you think such a story might not be true?

Doesn’t it sound designed to further feed the YouTube and vaccine conspiracy theorists?

Do you really think that the CEO of YouTube would die of turbo cancer which is linked in Conspiracy circles to the vaccine? I’m not questioning that vaccines cause such things - my mum is dying of it right now which I blame on the vaccine - but I don’t think it is plausible that one of the major players in the social media censorship game happens to fall victim to TPTB’s weapons.

I think this is likely a narrative crafted to fuel the anti-vaccine conspiracists to give them some high profile I told you so’s. This is a convoluted poisoned apple. Turbo cancer is for us plebs, not for them. Wojcicki, like King Charles and Kate Middleton, only have narrative cancer to appear relatable to the plebs they force cancer upon.

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

What you are describing sounds a lot like Cass Sunsteins proposals as outlined in his 2008 paper ‘Conspiracy Theories: Their Cause and Cure’ in which he suggested that government infiltrate conspiracy theories in order to steer them into supporting the actions of government.

Shortly afterwards, Sunstein was appointed to the UK governments Behavioural Insights Team (Behavioural manipulation. This team was largely responsible for their overt manipulation via their Spi-B branch relating to the drumming up of pandemic fear, lockdown compliance and vaccine uptake). At the same time he was appointed to some US Government consultancy role too.

In the documentary Hypernormalisation, there is a section on the methods the Russian government used to befuddle its population and how those same tactics were now in use in the UK and other western countries like USA. Although the documentary itself, being made by the BBC, is also deceptive and misleading it nevertheless has some enlightening moments. Anyway, Putin employed a theatre producer called Vladislav Surkov who funded and arranged both pro-government and anti-government protestors in a big theatrical display and then let it be known (methods unknown/undisclised) that that’s what they were doing so that the Russian people couldn’t tell what was fake and what was real.

In a striking parallel, Trump appointed Hollywood producer Steve Mnuchin to his cabinet and during the Trump administration we saw all these similarly choreographed anti and pro government protests such as BLM, proud boys, Qanon, Jan 6 etc and the entire narrative took on a distinctly fake, WWE-type feel with the media feeding the narratives continuously, in addition to the usual fake fayre such as shootings, assassination attempts et al

We have similar in the UK with news items like Sarah Everard and resultant ‘Reclaim these Streets!’ pop-up protests, Lucy Letby and the more recent riots of ‘far right thugs’ and Muslims as well as other assorted atrocity propaganda. Each side having their appointed spokespersons like GB News, Tommy Robinson, Neil Oliver, Russell Brand, Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, Candace Owens. The cast list is long.

Of course, then there is the deliberately directed resurgence of Christianity and Christ is King mob who want Christian nationalism and the like - anything so long as people maintain their belief that the Jewish Messiah who is the same figure as the ‘Lord God of Israel’ is actually their own ‘Lord and saviour’ and that the Jews were god’s chosen people and responsible for the civilisation and glorification of Europe with their “values” etc. Quickened as a response to the force feeding of LGBTQ and other Diversity agendas and the Islamic takeover - both of which, surprise surprise, are also Jewish ideological inventions.

It’s all designed to keep people off guard and it can be incredibly self-perpetuating, with false beliefs and false solutions taking root in peoples minds like a virus and spreading in the same manner, instigated by disinformation Typhoid Mary’s like the mainstream and alternative media’s in cahoots with all manner of people - including our respective militaries who make a study of psychological warfare and have entire brigades dedicated to waging it on domestic audiences.

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yip. And those are the words of NATO. The ‘we’ they refer to is, in this instance, NATO. And we, the civilians, are the ‘them’ in their them and us dichotomy.

Similar to when it is said ‘Diversity is our strength’ in which the average person thinks that they and their entire society are included within the ‘our’. Who is ‘our’ when they state that? It is ‘their’ strength and that’s how they mean it.

Did you notice that they also included nanotechnology and the like within their cognitive warfare weapons and NeuraLink etc. very Orwellian indeed. Very Brave New World. And Aldous Huxleys brother Julian was there at the founding of UNESCO too.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop peddling this false drama.

Josh Hawley is just one of the actors in this god awful ‘play’.

Stop trying to get people to follow along with this story arc as though it is anything other than a script.

It’s soap opera.

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

In Psy Ops, as with all character development, the protagonist needs a backstory to appear legit and convincing.

O’Keefe reeling off some highlights of his story may speak more to the craft of those who wrote his character arc through choreographed events designed to give him a backstory which would make him appear legit to those who follow him. But really he’s just highlighting the deceptions that have already been perpetrated in his name by the scriptwriters to attain the trust of his marks.

He’s far too polished and media trained.

Notice how all Psy op people are far too slick in front of a camera - even the apparent nobodies that bear witness to events and are interviewed by the news etc.

They have been media trained by tptb in preparation for their roles and it shows.

None of them have that real, authentic people vibe. They don’t talk or behave like real people do - they behave like actors pretending to be real people

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well, you put your faith in popes and the like, despite Jesus CLEARLY saying in Matthew 23:8-10

Mat 23:8  But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. Mat 23:9  And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Mat 23:10  Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.

Whereas 1st Timothy says:

1Ti 2:5  For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

So, your deference to popes and the like is not in line with Christianity as spoken of in the NT.

When you criticise that guy for reading his Bible directly instead of receiving traditions, well, Jesus had this to say about placing traditions above the word of ‘god’:

Mrk 7:6  He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. Mrk 7:7  Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. Mrk 7:8  For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do. Mrk 7:9  And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. Mrk 7:10  For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death: Mrk 7:11  But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. Mrk 7:12  And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; Mrk 7:13  Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

So… there!

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jews can’t subvert Christian society because Christian society is FROM the Jews.

They invented it. They own it. They can do to it, and with it, what they wilt.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

How did you even come across it then? And, having come across it, what compelled you to watch it if not your personal interest?

If these things are a guilty pleasure of yours you’re allowed to just say so..

I find myself watching YouTube videos whose whole raison d’etre is hating on Joe Rogans stable of comedians for example

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Mate, don’t you feel a bit weird with all that twee patter, calling some fella you’ve never met and don’t even know if he existed your lord and saying you have a burning love for him and all that?

It’s a bit odd isn’t it

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

A hexagon is a cube in 2D form. The hexagon of course being the inner section of the hexagram or so called star of David.

A flat packed cube makes a cross.

Concealed within the symbol of Judaism is the cube, concealed within the cube is the symbol of Christianity

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would like it if I misunderstood many things (I’m Janschology btw) but Jesus himself said multiple times that he is only come for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. He wasn’t interested in anyone other than Jews.

He said it is not appropriate to take the children’s (Jews) food and to cast it to the dogs (non Jews). When he sent his apostles out, he told them to stay away from the gentiles but to only seek out the lost sheep of the house of Israel. When he said I have come do that you may have life and have it more abundantly, he was only addressing his fellow Jews.

Do you acknowledge that Jesus is the person spoken of in Psalm 110? Jesus himself references Psalm 110 on a few occasions.

In which case, do you acknowledge that Jesus plan is to fill the nations with dead bodies?

Do you acknowledge that he is to rule in the midst of his enemies and that this was accomplished by making Rome the seat of Christianity?

You can assert that I have misunderstood many things until we’re both blue in the face but I have given you a nice, digestible amount of references that you could demonstrate my misunderstanding with. I do hope you will address Psalm 110 for me (and the similar sentiments in Revelation)

You did ask me to expand on what I wrote after all.

I hope your last response isn’t the peak of your riposte…

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pagan is just a collective term for not-Christian ie not-Jewish, just like goyim

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bad acting. Not realistic at all

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

1 Sam 2:10 references the LORD (in Hebrew ’Yehovah’) Psa 50:6 references God (in Hebrew ‘elohiym’, which is plural) Ecc 13:16 references elohiym also (plural) 1 Kings 22:19 talks about Yehovah again. As does Psa 11:4, but Psa 47:8 talks about Elohiym again.

So, the references that you yourself have given talk about different entities all translated as ‘god’.

What, in your understanding, are the differences between Yehovah and Elohiym? Bearing in mind that Elohiym is plural.

Let us see the wisdom and understanding of your own interpretation…

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I clearly know more than you having at least read the Bible.

It doesn’t matter whether I believe in it or not. The fact is that the Bible does NOT state that Yah is the almighty creator, not even once

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +2 / -2

Earlobes don’t contain cartilage, hence why they bleed so much

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earlobe

-2
Jacobin -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yes you do, the capillaries in the ears contain plenty of blood

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›