The sign says Chattanooga, which is in Tennessee.
Thanks, I just threw up in my mouth.
The guy behind this study is the same guy who has said the IFR is .15% from the beginning. His studies keep getting shit on by other academics as being wholly fabricated and filled with bad math and conjecture. He is the original source of "no worse than the flu". How is this latest study any different from his past failures?
Friendly reminder that alphabet agency heads have publicly admitted to lying to Trump during his intel briefings in order to push their agendas. One basic example is that pentagon officials deliberately misrepresented the number of troops deployed throughout the Middle East in order to stall the draw down.
I never knew Fred Armisen was a judge, or jewish, or a woman.
Trump didn't design the vaccines. He just said "sure, throw whatever the fuck you want in there and we'll test it on everyone."
"That page doesn't exist!"
Glad somebody said it. This shit is the most retarded theory I've heard in a while.
I know a family who lost their baby at 8 months. These people are hopelessly brainwashed, and their doctors are evil for even suggesting they take the vaccine while pregnant.
Well, I can see why it's banned. It started great, and then just turned into political ranting.
Aerosols can travel beyond six feet and may linger in the air; masking is more important than hand-washing when facing a threat like that.
This is wrong because it assumes that masks are able to handle aerosols. There is 0 evidence masks can do that. In fact, there isn't even evidence masks can handle water droplets.
The entire justification for masks has been "they trap the droplets in your breath that carry the virus". Studies on flu transmission in acute environments show no link between masks and infection spread of the flu - a virus presumed to be transmitted primarily via droplets.
If the virus is an aerosol, it doesn't need to be carried by droplets, meaning the mask has to be designed specifically to capture the virus itself. Covid is about .7-.14nm in diameter and has an oily, slippery lipid envelope around it. N95 masks are designed to capture oil-free particulates down to .3nm in diameter. Oily particulates go right through the mask, as do very tiny particles.
Covid is both tiny and oily. No amount of masking will stop it, and the data comparing mask mandated communities vs unmasked communities supports this.
Hate to be a kill joy, but this chart doesn't say a whole lot.
For starters, the y-axis starts at 70 million rather than 0, distorting the whole chart; '20's red line should be twice the length of '80's tan bar, not 6 times longer. Secondly, there are 3 points on this graph where an election had over 20 million more voters than the previous election - '88-'92 gained 25 mil, '00-'04 gained 20 mil, and '16-'20 gained 26 mil; 2020 isn't really an outlier in that regard, especially when you overlay a general trend line showing a steadily increasing voter turnout every year. However, it is odd that the biggest jumps happen every time a Democrat wins the white house away from a Republican.
If you want to say something with these numbers, maybe compare the total number of votes with the census population data and the total registered voters for each year. You're far more likely to find some fuckery there, and it'll be a lot more convincing.