0
Hardtruths420 0 points ago +1 / -1

You seem dumb/shilly.

The specifics are irrelevant.

We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.

This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.

Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.

It's not that I'm saying it isn't a problem. I'm saying they lit two fires, and want you focused on that, while the second fire burns unnoticed, and with far greater damage.

1
Hardtruths420 1 point ago +2 / -1

Someone should send this information to lawmakers on the judiciary committee.

They can, at minimum put some pressure on and give Durham cover to go after these bad apples stacking the jury pool, and pressure this judge to recuse.

Chances are most of them are completely ignorant and aren’t even following the trial.

Judge MUST recuse position given Lisa page connection and direct relevance to the larger conspiracy case.

-1
Hardtruths420 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Moot point. Who said the lies didn’t work? In fact, I said the opposite.

And I’m not licking anyone’s boot, unlike you, big brain.

It’s almost like the point went over your head because you’re a low IQ moron who can’t absorb a nuanced argument.

1
Hardtruths420 1 point ago +2 / -1

At this point you’re using these terms in completely meaningless ways.

They mean whatever you want then to mean, I guess.

2
Hardtruths420 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nunes isn’t controlled opposition.

He literally got the ball rolling on everything Durham is currently doing.

He was brave enough to do a public press release doubting the Russiagate nonsense and got buried by Schiff with a corrupt ethics review for like a year.

That’s not controlled opposition.

Fox is. He doesn’t have much of a choice if he wants to get something out to his base.

And that base is already politically stratified because of controlled opposition like fox.

It’s not like Nunes created that dynamic.

3
Hardtruths420 3 points ago +5 / -2

Are you only just realizing this…?

1
Hardtruths420 1 point ago +3 / -2

So you’re saying that you knew the claims about foreign hacking into dominion machines was cia seeded disinformation to provide cover for an on the ground mule operation?

Maybe get off your high horse. You probably ate up the same disinfo like they did.

That disinfo would have been unnecessary had Trump and Powell been playing for the other side, as you suggest.

2
Hardtruths420 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think it’s more of a defense mechanism.

People assume that anyone given a platform must be allowed to do so by the powers that be.

I think the truth is somewhere in between. I think Joe is a good guy, but he’s aware of the corruption behind the scenes and the pragmatic limits of freedom of speech.

He definitely self censors but seems to try and push the envelope whenever he can. Especially on issues related to fitness or health—things he has some domain expertise in.

-1
Hardtruths420 -1 points ago +4 / -5

You’re doing whatever you can to confirm your own bias.

Literally shoving a square peg through a round hole until it fits…

1
Hardtruths420 1 point ago +5 / -4

Those meds don’t stop you from feeling negativity.

You can still have anxiety and depression, etc.

Very weak logic, imho.

2
Hardtruths420 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why do so many think he is controlled opposition?

What evidence is there?

-1
Hardtruths420 -1 points ago +4 / -5

If this was the case, then why are many schizophrenics living symptom free on medication that controls their symptoms?

Does the medicine somehow ward off these evil demons?

Excuse me if I think you’re grasping here.

You can believe all sorts of things and find a way to view them as plausible.

Example: Schizophrenic symptoms aren’t caused by demons… they’re caused by ET’s—one that live within our dimension—trying to make contact with an inferior species that’s not ready for it.

See how easy that was?

-1
Hardtruths420 -1 points ago +1 / -2

He’s being disingenuous to some degree.

Powell did make those legal arguments. But it’s also easy to see that she truly did believe her statements and did this as a legal manuever, since she was unable to ultimately prove her most extreme claims.

That the cia or some shadowy group directed the election from overseas and basically hacked the voting machines. It’s possible that this happened to some degree but she’s not in a position to prove this in court.

Those claims were the “kraken” and they were unfortunately never substantiated, from what I understand.

And given what we’re seeing from D’Souza, it looks probable that this was disinformation seeded to Powell to muddy the waters and misdirect everyone (unbeknownst to her).

view more: ‹ Prev