Powell did make those legal arguments. But it’s also easy to see that she truly did believe her statements and did this as a legal manuever, since she was unable to ultimately prove her most extreme claims.
That the cia or some shadowy group directed the election from overseas and basically hacked the voting machines. It’s possible that this happened to some degree but she’s not in a position to prove this in court.
Those claims were the “kraken” and they were unfortunately never substantiated, from what I understand.
And given what we’re seeing from D’Souza, it looks probable that this was disinformation seeded to Powell to muddy the waters and misdirect everyone (unbeknownst to her).
We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.
This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.
Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.
It's not that I'm saying it isn't a problem. I'm saying they lit two fires, and want you focused on that, while the second fire burns unnoticed, and with far greater damage.
Notice how the cucks have no rebuttal, just censorship in the form of downvotes.
That means you are over the target.
He’s being disingenuous to some degree.
Powell did make those legal arguments. But it’s also easy to see that she truly did believe her statements and did this as a legal manuever, since she was unable to ultimately prove her most extreme claims.
That the cia or some shadowy group directed the election from overseas and basically hacked the voting machines. It’s possible that this happened to some degree but she’s not in a position to prove this in court.
Those claims were the “kraken” and they were unfortunately never substantiated, from what I understand.
And given what we’re seeing from D’Souza, it looks probable that this was disinformation seeded to Powell to muddy the waters and misdirect everyone (unbeknownst to her).
You seem dumb/shilly.
The specifics are irrelevant.
We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.
This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.
Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.
It's not that I'm saying it isn't a problem. I'm saying they lit two fires, and want you focused on that, while the second fire burns unnoticed, and with far greater damage.