From the end of August, though I hadn't seen this particular press release until now. An excerpt:
About 3.5 million doses of the experimental vaccine Onrab are being distributed in parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Tennessee — which also are getting the approved vaccine — plus four other states.
Onrab comes in blister packs with green, marshmallow-flavored coating. Wildlife Services hopes it may be approved next year in spite of lingering pandemic-related delays.
Onrab appears to be of viral vector format and a cursory glance at available literature seems to indicate shedding...?
Also, mist/airborne/contact 'vaccines' incoming?
Some scientists have speculated that bats could be vaccinated during hibernation, perhaps with a fine mist or with a gel that could be transferred from bat to bat, Chipman said. Early research is testing the idea in vampire bats, which live in Mexico and Central and South America and might spread such a vaccine within a colony by grooming each other.
All the world's a lab.
I sometimes wonder if the original China images of the people falling over and dying were meant to foreshadow SADS in some way. With all the pre-fab fearmongering over "COVID", maybe SADS was supposed to be rolled into the long-COVID or Omicron symptomology and the two phenomena (SADS and pick-a-scare) didn't quite sync up as intended.
That said, these video clips are so utterly surreal that I have a hard time considering the possibility of them being real. Then again, I never thought athletes dropping dead on the field in any kind of quantity could possibly be a thing. It's been a wild few years!
Funnily enough, the movie was set in 2022.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070723/mediaviewer/rm1879760129/?ref_=tt_ov_i
Go figure.
Most of the older people I know have expressed suspicion over the shots to start, but then folded over like a wet napkin at the first sign of pressure to take them (often a requirement placed in front of them to see their grandchildren, which makes me ill to think about).
Now, many months in, despite some people they know having reacted badly to the shots, despite one of them having been sick for weeks after the shots, many of them don't see a problem with taking them, conceptually-speaking. Some have received a booster, some haven't -- I suspect they would fold to pressure if it were placed as a requirement to see grandchildren or travel or go to a restaurant as with the original doses.
The only one who has been willing to at least look at the other side of the argument over the shots, seems to have made up her mind not to get them. She has ultimately decided not to take them, even though her children have set them as a requirement to see their new baby. She has endured all of her various doctors pushing them on her, all kinds of descriptions of how much she would suffer if she did not receive the injections. To this point, she can look around and see that, while she has not been ill, many who have received them have been ill and have defined that illness as "COVID". This does reinforce her will to avoid the shots, but she is very much afraid of the implications for her family, friends and humanity in-general. She seems to feel pretty isolated -- she can see it, but nobody around her can -- and is bumping up against the too-common problem of trying to get the information to others and finding that they refuse to look at or (in some cases) talk about it.
Media that seems to have been convincing involves watching the "experts" -- the people we're all supposed to trust -- talk about the shots in a way that is antithetical to what we would commonly consider a vaccine to do or antithetical to the idea of "safe and effective". Being able to see the clinical trials ongoing, listening to the VRBPAC panel say that 'we just need to shoot them into kids arms to find out how safe they are', to see where the FDA had requested 75 YEARS to release Pfizer clinical trial data...all of this seems to have been quite an eye-opener regarding the status of our "experts". Additionally, she has noticed the extreme censorship surrounding contrary opinions and has, herself, been subject to a great deal of condescension for asking questions of her doctors.
Most of the younger people I know (millennial and younger) have been all-in on all of it. Talking about it with them gets an eyeroll -- total dismissal. I have no idea how to begin to reach them.
I'm listening to the press conference now (not really by choice) and, while the term "mental health" invariably gets thrown around after one of these, it's practically in every sentence during this particular press conference. It's somewhat striking.
Could this be a drive for universal adoption of “Social and Emotional Learning” (SEL) programs or similar in schools? Corey's Digs has an interesting piece on the premise of SEL: https://www.coreysdigs.com/education-system/alert-2030-psychological-agenda-obedience-training-for-prek-adults-already-global-with-billions-in-funding-for-full-control-part-2-programming/
Many of the usual suspects show up behind this particular program. I'm sure a 'traumatic event caused by a deranged child' would serve as quite the catalyst to push further adoption of mental health programs in schools.
I genuinely don't think there was an actual writer here -- opinion piece by algorithm, maybe? I wonder if there are publications that do this/do this with any regularity and just have the 'author' sign off on it for $$, similar to many studies in scientific journals.
A separate aside, but also for consideration: https://futurism.com/the-byte/deepfake-fake-journalist
Yours is not to ask what to believe, but to believe what the government says as they say it in real time. Should you find contradictions, you should believe each individual opposing point simultaneously. Should the government change its stance on a matter, backpedal or obfuscate, yours is to keep up with the government's current stance and believe this. Be water -- move as the government moves you.
I'm sure you remember 'in your home, while having sex'.
https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a33482118/safe-sex-coronavirus/
When the City of New York updated its memo, it promoted masked intercourse, advising: “Maybe it’s your thing, maybe it’s not, but during COVID-19 wearing a face covering that covers your nose and mouth is a good way to add a layer of protection during sex.”
I tend to agree with you on your classification in absolute terms. Further, I feel that moving away from a classification of "communism", will move the conversation into something that is harder to classify as a "left or right" political movement and puts it firmly in a frame of "a bid for total control, everywhere, ever". This is a frame that is maybe a bit sobering for all of us -- left, right and center.
Legacy media (at least in the U.S.) will tend to frame some of these political moves as "far leftist", while other outlets will classify public objection to them as "far right". This comes across as tailor-made to further fragment the vast majority of us being imposed-upon. It is social credit, it is public-private partnership, it is the rule of a few technocratic overlords over everyone else in an invasion of your life and your body and your mind (many would argue your soul).
from a previous tweet:
"Tomorrow on @inthebubblepod we will do something we haven’t done. We will break some news. We are formally launching a national system for digital vaccine credentials. Details on the show."
Funnily enough, that doesn't creep me out as much as https://ibb.co/Sr4PFwG does. (around 30 sec in).
Edit: does this one look particularly gooey to anyone else? https://ibb.co/8N2gNM6 (time stamp 1:23)
The tests are, at minimum, a part of the fraud that puts a sheen of legitimacy on all of this. You've gotta do what you've gotta do, but I lost my job because I refused to disclose my vaccine status and declined testing. The choice as presented is engineered to be a rock and a hard place.
I trust the swabs about as much as I trust the stupid masks -- they are definitely a part of the show, and there have been some interesting indicators that might make one hesitant to use both, and possibly suspicious of mal intent behind the forceful push to render them essential and ubiquitous when our collective knowledge base up to 2020 states they have no business being either of those things.
Yep, right onto the schedule for kids and adults. Not a surprise, but tragic nonetheless.
As a slight silver lining, there were nearly 90,000 comments posted to the ACIP meeting entry (only a fraction of that made it to public viewing) -- clicking around on random comments over a number of pages, I had figured I would see a mix of positive and negative comments.
I didn't see a single positive comment for adding the covid shots to the childhood schedule. In my daily life, there are still people who believe the shots work and are ready to line up for whatever, but I was surprised at how many people do see what is happening here and are ready to make it known that they see it.
The link to the comments made public: https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2022-0111-0001/comment