▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely none of the etymological games you practice apply to real life at all.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The antidote to : 'When I was a child (literalist) I spake as a child (by literal interpretation).'

What would you have us believe is a metaphor? How do you know it's not metaphors that are the childish things?

God as El, emanating as the masc. 'Ra' within the fem. field 'Is' to be seen as the totality of the spiritual concept of Is-ra-el. Not a place. Those 'chosen' to see it will be saving 'it' for last.

So? What's the point with this translation "excercise"? You leave us to hang high and dry by throwing random info at the readers.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Today a screed post, tomorrow a Christianity Derangement Syndrome post.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because he got banned by a nonChristian. Death to censorship.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The triumph of faith? No. The triumph of blind faith? Now there is your issue.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

He censored you. How censorious.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure, and JD Vance's wife forgetting her ring

So that's not Kirk then. So I'm right.

is just a coincidence.

No more of a coincidence then you and Malta being ideologically aligned, use the EXACT same talking points and words, help each other (yourself), and are both censorers on c/feminism.

Vance/Kirk 2028

Would prefer Kirk/Stephen Mller 2028.

I don't think there's a conspiracy, this is just the right discovering female duplicity in "their own" for the first time.

If a sample size of 1 Erika supports your position, then my sample size of 1 Melania disproves your position. So we are back at square 1.

Erika Kirk was a likely cheater, definitely someone who has no morals, who latched onto Charlie as her ticket to fame.

Correct. Emotionalists may not handle this thouth.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong, it's not Charles who is the C**. It is Cabot who is the c**.

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

That implies he knew. He fell for Deep State erika.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

brought this up when Speaker Tradc#ck

Vague label.

eliminated Medicaid for "29 year old males playing video games"

what

That was pure, unadulterated spite.

Opinion.

saved a significant amount of money

Ending the IRS would save us a lot of money.

Speaker Tradc#ck

Vague label

I'm sure this will surprise no one, is a Baptist.

How do you know?

Where does baptist belief contradict the Bible? Do you know?

The second most tradc#cked birth at all costs form of

Christc#ckery.

Even if it's as bad as you believe, atheic**ry is worse.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

attack single men

No he hasn't.

more malicious than women

Opinion and incorrect.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

As if you and Joe M(alt)a don't copy your arguments!

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

openly forcing... the person forcing

No he's not.

the largest community is muh con pro!!

No.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's done more for free speech (buying x) and technology (spacex) than you or I ever have. Period.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

lied to

About what?

distancing yourselves from him

Where?

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, you hate nazism. Know the difference.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

they openly stated their desire to silence

But I thought you said they WOULDN'T say those things? :p

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

[strawman]

worst president

Objectively false. Biden and obummer. Thanks for admitting your ignorance.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Project 2025 is a clandestine subversive institution, that speaks in demands that are not directly stated, but clearly marked out by their ideological bent.

"It's not actually doing anything bad, but you must trust me and Joe Alta as the only ones who have this magic discernment power!! Only we 1 person have the real truth!!"

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

is your antinatalist system subject to objective verification outside standards of truth or are you just here to turn everything into misogyny?

[NOT ANSWERED]

To compare it to flat earth, it'd be like my saying you admit collecting money that contains pyramids and constellations that are both support for the globe lies of astronomy that have been propagated for millennia. That's how stupid your derails sound at the same time as you try to sound reasonable.

[NOT ADDRESSED]

Even JG5 is toning down his one-trick pony and trying to teach it how to vibe with the community at times, but you're not.

[NOT ADDRESSED]

So I'd appreciate your answer to my own key question because if you have a foundation of truth then suddenly your views on the world can be built cooperatively rather than self-destructively.

[NOT ADDRESSED]

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Give evidence of his so called "paycheck" or never mention him being "paid" anymore.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Project 2025 is an anti-freedom, anti-1A coup of democracy built on lies to satisfy the fragile ego

I agree, it is built upon leftist lies to smear the Right and fool people into thinking the Right is bad. And to satisfy the smug ego of the "better than thou" leftists.

of a bunch of Christians who can't accept that their ideology is in decline.

Which ideology?

I have never shared false information.

Like evolution being true? Like the Right "killing kirk"?

Like we all can't see that I'm clearly talking about the coercive global narrative pushed by Elon Musk's money

If this nonsense were real, many many more people would believe it.

if you don't bend to the will of Christians, America will not defend you in war.

No evidence. And nearly every belief would rush to do such a policy. Oh, there's that false information you claimed you haven't shared. You may believe it's true, but sadly for you it isn't.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›