I love that all this is coming out though. The anti-Israel spergs are killing natalism for me - their leader's marriage was a sham and he was cucked all the way.
Sure, and JD Vance's wife forgetting her ring is just a coincidence. Vance/Kirk 2028 v Shapiro/Ocasio-Cortez 2028. I really hope I'm wrong about that second one.
Erika was for the streets, as the kids would say.
I don't think there's a conspiracy, this is just the right discovering female duplicity in "their own" for the first time. Erika Kirk was a likely cheater, definitely someone who has no morals, who latched onto Charlie as her ticket to fame.
No more of a coincidence then you and Malta being ideologically aligned, use the EXACT same talking points and words, help each other (yourself), and are both censorers on c/feminism.
Vance/Kirk 2028
Would prefer Kirk/Stephen Mller 2028.
I don't think there's a conspiracy, this is just the right discovering female duplicity in "their own" for the first time.
If a sample size of 1 Erika supports your position, then my sample size of 1 Melania disproves your position. So we are back at square 1.
Erika Kirk was a likely cheater, definitely someone who has no morals, who latched onto Charlie as her ticket to fame.
Correct. Emotionalists may not handle this thouth.
That implies he knew. He fell for Deep State erika.
No, it doesn't.
I love that all this is coming out though. The anti-Israel spergs are killing natalism for me - their leader's marriage was a sham and he was cucked all the way.
Wrong, it's not Charles who is the C**. It is Cabot who is the c**.
Sure, and JD Vance's wife forgetting her ring is just a coincidence. Vance/Kirk 2028 v Shapiro/Ocasio-Cortez 2028. I really hope I'm wrong about that second one.
Erika was for the streets, as the kids would say.
I don't think there's a conspiracy, this is just the right discovering female duplicity in "their own" for the first time. Erika Kirk was a likely cheater, definitely someone who has no morals, who latched onto Charlie as her ticket to fame.
So that's not Kirk then. So I'm right.
No more of a coincidence then you and Malta being ideologically aligned, use the EXACT same talking points and words, help each other (yourself), and are both censorers on c/feminism.
Would prefer Kirk/Stephen Mller 2028.
If a sample size of 1 Erika supports your position, then my sample size of 1 Melania disproves your position. So we are back at square 1.
Correct. Emotionalists may not handle this thouth.