1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

They could have been Asian. There needs to be an explanation for their genotype appearing across the globe in the “indigenous peoples” of the world (who all share a common genetic ancestor of today’s “asian” phenotype)

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +4 / -3

Ounce and inch likewise derive from base-12 numeracy, in terms of examples of this system persisting.

It really seems to have touched every continent in the time before recorded history.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

Doesn’t explain the worship of, and widespread reference to: 6-fingered, red haired, blue-eyed giants ruling kingdoms across the continents as “god-kings” and teaching their people things like numeracy, warfare, alchemy/chemistry, and “magic” - as attested to in the foundational “myths” of most all ancient cultures.

10
Graphenium 10 points ago +10 / -0

The Sumerians and ancient Chinese (zodiacal systems) used base-12. The Babylonian descendants of the Sumerians used and modified their progenitor’s base-12 to base-60, likely to further their astrological pursuits. Ounce and inch likewise come from vestigial Roman use of base-12, likely as holdovers from the influence of these earlier cultures and their systems.

You can probably find some more interesting info on the subject easily here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal#Origin


Polydactyly, red hair, and increased stature appear to be linked markers which are indicative of, for lack of a better term, Nephilim descent.

The Mark of the Giants | Six Fingers and Toes in the Ancient World |

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9vP4-tfFcWc

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jim Viera - TedX - Stone Builders, Mounds & the Giants of Ancient America

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FNo_dzgznNI


Skeletons in the Cupboard - New Zealand aboriginal documentary

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PBFpGayPATs


Two great videos to get people started on the subject imo.

And yeah, that’s one thing I’ve come to not like about Hancock. He’s so afraid of being “quoted out of context” that he refuses to speak aloud many of the possibilities raised by his otherwise great research. But he had no problem doing 10 seasons of Ancient Aliens...ehh idk, he’s still a net positive for sure

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to what I’ve seen (there is a slightly longer version of this video available, with subtitles), these tests are the “graduation exam” to leave level one and begin level 2 of the school, Mo Pai.

Because an individual does not fuse Yin and Yang energy within their body until level 4 (and thus cannot project their chi outside of their body), what is happening is that Chang is producing a thick field of Yin energy into which the student can project some of their accumulated (through the level 1 exercise) Yang energy.

So in a sense both master and student are part of what you see in this clip

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you so much for everything you’ve shared in this thread

We are all burdened with desires. Even the desire to have no desire is still a desire so have the desire to be of service in that we will always be working on the spirit and removing obstacles infront of others.

truly insightful and beautiful.

If you ever feel inclined, I’d love to see you share at c/HumanPotential , which is just a place I made to try to act as a repository for this kind of information.

Cheers man

5
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

Jim McMillan is the man in the video, an American who saw the original video of Chang (sticked on c/HumanPotential), bought a plane ticket to Indonesia, found the man he had seen before only on tape, and endeavored to become his student. Eventually this happened, and he trained in Chang’s lineage of internal martial arts (Nei Kung), known as Mo Pai for some years before the school was closed to westerners.

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +1 / -2

CHAPTER X

POLARITY

"Everything is dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature, but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half-truths; all paradoxes may be reconciled."--The Kybalion.

The great Fourth Hermetic Principle--the Principle of Polarity embodies the truth that all manifested things have "two sides"; "two aspects"; "two poles"; a "pair of opposites," with manifold degrees between the two extremes. The old paradoxes, which have ever perplexed the mind of men, are explained by an understanding of this Principle. Man has always recognized something akin to this Principle, and has endeavored to express it by such sayings, maxims and aphorisms as the following: "Everything is and isn't, at the same time"; "all truths are but half-truths"; "every truth is half-false"; "there are two sides to everything"--"there is a reverse side to every shield," etc., etc.

The Hermetic Teachings are to the effect that the difference between things seemingly diametrically opposed to each other is merely a matter of degree. It teaches that "the pairs of opposites may be reconciled," and that "thesis and anti-thesis are identical in nature, but different in degree"; and that the "universal reconciliation of opposites" is effected by a recognition of this Principle of Polarity. The teachers claim that illustrations of this Principle may be had on every hand, and from an examination into the real nature of anything. They begin by showing that Spirit and Matter are but the two poles of the same thing, the intermediate planes being merely degrees of vibration. They show that THE ALL and The Many are the same, the difference being merely a matter of degree of Mental Manifestation. Thus the LAW and Laws are the two opposite poles of one thing. Likewise, PRINCIPLE and Principles. Infinite Mind and finite minds.

Then passing on to the Physical Plane, they illustrate the Principle by showing that Heat and Cold are identical in nature, the differences being merely a matter of degrees. The thermometer shows many degrees of temperature, the lowest pole being called "cold," and the highest "heat." Between these two poles are many degrees of "heat" or "cold," call them either and you are equally correct. The higher of two degrees is always "warmer," while the lower is always "colder." There is no absolute standard-all is a matter of degree. There is no place on the thermometer where heat ceases and cold begins. It is all a matter of higher or lower vibrations. The very terms "high" and "low," which we are compelled to use, are but poles of the same thing-the terms are relative. So with "East and West"--travel around the world in an eastward direction, and you reach a point which is called west at your starting point, and you return from that westward point. Travel far enough North, and you will find yourself traveling South, or vice versa.

Light and Darkness are poles of the same thing, with many degrees between them. The musical scale is the same--starting with "C" you move upward until you reach another "C" and so on, the differences between the two ends of the board being the same, with many degrees between the two extremes. The scale of color is the same-higher and lower vibrations being the only difference between high violet and low red. Large and Small are relative. So are Noise and Quiet; Hard and Soft follow the rule. Likewise Sharp and Dull. Positive and Negative are two poles of the same thing, with countless degrees between them.

Good and Bad are not absolute--we call one end of the scale Good and the other Bad, or one end Good and the other Evil, according to the use of the terms. A thing is "less good" than the thing higher in the scale; but that "less good" thing, in turn, is "more good" than the thing next below it--and so on, the "more or less" being regulated by the position on the scale.

And so it is on the Mental Plane. "Love and. Hate" are generally regarded as being things diametrically opposed to each other; entirely different; unreconcilable. But we apply the Principle of Polarity; we find that there is no such thing as Absolute Love or Absolute Hate, as distinguished from each other. The two are merely terms applied to the two poles of the same thing. Beginning at any point of the scale we find "more love," or "less hate," as we ascend the scale; and "more hate" or "less love" as we descend this being true no matter from what point, high or low, we may start. There are degrees of Love and Hate, and there is a middle point where "Like and Dislike" become so faint that it is difficult to distinguish between them. Courage and Fear come under the same rule. The Pairs of Opposites exist everywhere. Where you find one thing you find its opposite-the two poles.

And it is this fact that enables the Hermetist to transmute one mental state into another, along the lines of Polarization. Things belonging to different classes cannot be transmuted into each other, but things of the same class may be changed, that is, may have their polarity changed. Thus Love never becomes East or West, or Red or Violet-but it may and often does turn into Hate and likewise Hate may be transformed into Love, by changing its polarity. Courage may be transmuted into Fear, and the reverse. Hard things may be rendered Soft. Dull things become Sharp. Hot things become Cold. And so on, the transmutation always being between things of the same kind of different degrees. Take the case of a Fearful man. By raising his mental vibrations along the line of Fear- Courage, he can be filled with the highest degree of Courage and Fearlessness. And, likewise, the Slothful man may change himself into an Active, Energetic individual simply by polarizing along the lines of the desired quality.

The student who is familiar with the processes by which the various schools of Mental Science, etc., produce changes in the mental states of those following their teachings, may not readily understand the principle underlying many of these changes. When, however, the Principle of Polarity is once grasped, and it is seen that the mental changes are occasioned by a change of polarity-a sliding along the same scale-the hatter is readily understood. The change is not in the nature of a transmutation of one thing into another thing entirely different-but is merely a change of degree in the same things, a vastly important difference. For instance, borrowing an analogy from the Physical Plane, it is impossible to change Heat into Sharpness, Loudness, Highness, etc., but Heat may readily be transmuted into Cold, simply by lowering the vibrations. In the same way Hate and Love are mutually transmutable; so are Fear and Courage. But Fear cannot be transformed into Love, nor can Courage be transmuted into Hate. The mental states belong to innumerable classes, each class of which has its opposite poles, along which transmutation is possible.

The student will readily recognize that in the mental states, as well as in the phenomena of the Physical Plane, the two poles may be classified as Positive and Negative, respectively. Thus Love is Positive to Hate; Courage to Fear; Activity to Non-Activity, etc., etc. And it will also be noticed that even to those unfamiliar with the Principle of Vibration, the Positive pole seems to be of a higher degree than the Negative, and readily dominates it. The tendency of Nature is in the direction of the dominant activity of the Positive pole.

In addition to the changing of the poles of one's own mental states by the operation of the art of Polarization, the phenomena of Mental Influence, in its manifold phases, shows us that the principle may be extended so as to embrace the phenomena of the influence of one mind over that of another, of which so much has been written and taught of late years. When it is understood that Mental Induction is possible, that is that mental states may be produced by "induction" from others, then we can readily see how a certain rate of vibration, or polarization of a certain mental state, may be communicated to another person, and his polarity in that class of mental states thus changed. It is along this principle that the results of many of the "mental treatments" are obtained. For instance, a person is "blue," melancholy and full of fear. A mental scientist bringing his own mind up to the desired vibration by his trained will, and thus obtaining the desired polarization in his own case, then produces a similar mental state in the other by induction, the result being that the vibrations are raised and the person polarizes toward the Positive end of the scale instead toward the Negative, and his Fear and other negative emotions are transmuted to Courage and similar positive mental states. A little study will show you that these mental changes are nearly all along the line of Polarization, the change being one of degree rather than of kind.

A knowledge of the existence of this great Hermetic Principle will enable the student to better understand his own mental states, and those of other people. He will see that these states are all matters of degree, and seeing thus, he will be able to raise or lower the vibration at will--to change his mental poles, and thus be Master of his mental states, instead of being their servant and slave. And by his knowledge he will be able to aid his fellows intelligently and by the appropriate methods change the polarity when the same is desirable. We advise all students to familiarize themselves with this Principle of Polarity, for a correct understanding of the same will throw light on many difficult subjects.

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +1 / -2

CHAPTER XIII

GENDER

"Gender is in everything; everything has its Masculine and Feminine Principles; Gender manifests on all planes."--The Kybalion.

The great Seventh Hermetic Principle--the Principle of Gender--embodies the truth that there is Gender manifested in everything--that the Masculine and Feminine principles are ever present and active in all phases of phenomena, on each and every plane of life. At this point we think it well to call your attention to the fact that Gender, in its Hermetic sense, and Sex in the ordinarily accepted use of the term, are not the same.

The word "Gender" is derived from the Latin root meaning "to beget; to procreate; to generate; to create; to produce." A moment's consideration will show you that the word has a much broader and more general meaning than the term "Sex," the latter referring to the physical distinctions between male and female living things. Sex is merely a manifestation of Gender on a certain plane of the Great Physical Plane--the plane of organic life. We wish to impress this distinction upon your minds, for the reason that certain writers, who have acquired a smattering of the Hermetic Philosophy, have sought to identify this Seventh Hermetic Principle with wild and fanciful, and often reprehensible, theories and teachings regarding Sex.

The office of Gender is solely that of creating, producing, generating, etc., and its manifestations are visible on every plane of phenomena. It is somewhat difficult to produce proofs of this along scientific lines, for the reason that science has not as yet recognized this Principle as of universal application. But still some proofs are forthcoming from scientific sources. In the first place, we find a distinct manifestation of the Principle of Gender among the corpuscles, ions, or electrons, which constitute the basis of Matter as science now knows the latter, and which by forming certain combinations form the Atom, which until lately was regarded as final and indivisible.

The latest word of science is that the atom is composed of a multitude of corpuscles, electrons, or ions (the various names being applied by different authorities) revolving around each other and vibrating at a high degree and intensity. But the accompanying statement is made that the formation of the atom is really due to the clustering of negative corpuscles around a positive one---the positive corpuscles seeming to exert a certain influence upon the negative corpuscles, causing the latter to assume certain combinations and thus "create" or "generate" an atom. This is in line with the most ancient Hermetic Teachings, which have always identified the Masculine principle of Gender with the "Positive," and the Feminine with the "Negative" Poles of Electricity (so called).

Now a word at this point regarding this identification. The public mind has formed an entirely erroneous impression regarding the qualities of the so-called "Negative" pole of electrified or magnetized Matter. The terms Positive and Negative are very wrongly applied to this phenomenon by science. The word Positive means something real and strong, as compared with a Negative unreality or weakness. Nothing is further from the real facts of electrical phenomenon. The so-called Negative pole of the battery is really the pole in and by which the generation or production of new forms and energies is manifested. There is nothing "negative" about it. The best scientific authorities now use the word "Cathode" in place of "Negative," the word Cathode coming from the Greek root meaning "descent; the path of generation, etc," From the Cathode pole emerge the swarm of electrons or corpuscles; from the same pole emerge those wonderful "rays" which have revolutionized scientific conceptions during the past decade. The Cathode pole is the Mother of all of the strange phenomena which have rendered useless the old textbooks, and which have caused many long accepted theories to be relegated to the scrap-pile of scientific speculation. The Cathode, or Negative Pole, is the Mother Principle of Electrical Phenomena, and of the finest forms of matter as yet known to science. So you see we are justified in refusing to use the term "Negative" in our consideration of the subject, and in insisting upon substituting the word "Feminine" for the old term. The facts of the case bear us out in this, without taking the Hermetic Teachings into consideration. And so we shall use the word "Feminine" in the place of "Negative" in speaking of that pole of activity.

The latest scientific teachings are that the creative corpuscles or electrons are Feminine (science says "they are composed of negative electricity"-we say they are composed of Feminine energy). A Feminine corpuscle becomes detached from, or rather leaves, a Masculine corpuscle, and starts on a new career. It actively seeks a union with a Masculine corpuscle, being urged thereto by the natural impulse to create new forms of Matter or Energy. One writer goes so far as to use the term "it at once seeks, of its own volition, a union," etc. This detachment and uniting form the basis of the greater part of the activities of the chemical world. When the Feminine corpuscle unites with a Masculine corpuscle, a certain process is begun. The Feminine particles vibrate rapidly under the influence of the Masculine energy, and circle rapidly around the latter. The result is the birth of a new atom. This new atom is really composed of a union of the Masculine and Feminine electrons, or corpuscles, but when the union is formed the atom is a separate thing, having certain properties, but no longer manifesting the property of free electricity. The process of detachment or separation of the Feminine electrons is called "ionization." These electrons, or corpuscles, are the most active workers in Nature's field. Arising from their unions, or combinations, manifest the varied phenomena of light, heat, electricity, magnetism, attraction, repulsion, chemical affinity and the reverse, and similar phenomena. And all this arises from the operation of the Principle of Gender on the plane of Energy.

The part of the Masculine principle seems to be that of directing a certain inherent energy toward the Feminine principle, and thus starting into activity the creative processes. But the Feminine principle is the one always doing the active creative work-and this is so on all planes. And yet, each principle is incapable of operative energy without the assistance of the other. In some of the forms of life, the two principles are combined in one organism. For that matter, everything in the organic world manifests both genders--there is always the Masculine present in the Feminine form, and the Feminine form. The Hermetic Teachings include much regarding the operation of the two principles of Gender in the production and manifestation of various forms of energy, etc., but we do not deem it expedient to go into detail regarding the same at this point, because we are unable to back up the same with scientific proof, for the reason that science has not as yet progressed thus far. But the example we have given you of the phenomena of the electrons or corpuscles will show you that science is on the right path, and will also give you a general idea of the underlying principles.

Some leading scientific investigators have announced their belief that in the formation of crystals there was to be found something that corresponded to "sex-activity" which is another straw showing the direction the scientific winds are blowing. And each year will bring other facts to corroborate the correctness of the Hermetic Principle of Gender. It will be found that Gender is in constant operation and manifestation in the field of inorganic matter, and in the field of Energy or Force. Electricity is now generally regarded as the "Something" into which all other forms of energy seem to melt or dissolve. The "Electrical Theory of the Universe" is the latest scientific doctrine, and is growing rapidly in popularity and general acceptance. And it thus follows that if we are able to discover in the phenomena of electricity-even at the very root and source of its manifestations a clear and unmistakable evidence of the presence of Gender and its activities, we are justified in asking you to believe that science at last has offered proofs of the existence in all universal phenomena of that great Hermetic Principle-the Principle of Gender.

It is not necessary to take up your time with the well known phenomena of the "attraction and repulsion" of the atoms; chemical affinity; the "loves and hates" of the atomic particles; the attraction or cohesion between the molecules of matter. These facts are too well known to need extended comment from us. But, have you ever considered that all of these things are manifestations of the Gender Principle? Can you not see that the phenomena is "on all fours" with that of the corpuscles or electrons? And more than this, can you not see the reasonableness of the Hermetic Teachings which assert that the very Law of Gravitation-that strange attraction by reason of which all particles and bodies of matter in the universe tend toward each other is but another manifestation of the Principle of Gender, which operates in the direction of attracting the Masculine to the Feminine energies, and vice versa? We cannot offer you scientific proof of this at this time-but examine the phenomena in the light of the Hermetic Teachings on the subject, and see if you have not a better working hypothesis than any offered by physical science. Submit all physical phenomena to the test, and you will discern the Principle of Gender ever in evidence.


The Kybalion (1926)

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s another possibility for sure. Also the possibility that our “count” of history is off - I’ve heard the idea that the dark ages lasted some hundreds of years longer than “recorded history” states. No idea on the validity of the data/arguments but it’s certainly possible.

I do find myself assuming that ~13,000 years ago was (atleast near) the “peak” of the cycle, just because of how well that explains the motivations and capabilities of the megalithic builders. Things like the Sphinx water erosion data + astrological alignments that fit that era/Age of the Precession.

But yeah, who knows for sure

Cheers man!

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hinduism explicitly? I’d guess not much at all

Whatever the common thread is between the various mystery schools, religions, and traditions? I do think that’s what’s driving them.

If you want to understand occultism I think it’s best to look back at it through history. Start with Hermeticism, Alchemy, and Kabbalah and you will have a pretty good understanding of the mindset of an occultist. IMO atleast.

https://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/kyb/index.htm

The Kybalion is a good reference, I recommend the chapters on Polarity and Gender especially, for this convo

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be. It’s important to remember things aren’t “1:1” in this worldview - golden things happen in base times, and base events happen in golden times. For example, we both seem to agree that approximately 12-13,000 years ago, the Younger Dryas Event happened - this was CATASTROPHIC, but it happened literally at the peak of the Golden age/Satya yuga.

So the worst thing to happen, happened at the “best” time, all else considered. That kind of understanding, plus my own limited perspective, mean I don’t make any hard judgements, just consider all the possibilities in some kind of probability matrix.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I think so, somewhere around halfway through Dwarpa (bronze) yuga.

Most importantly, because exact numbers can always be debated until we know more, we are absolutely on the upswing. We’re at the time where the foundation for the future gets laid. Exciting times

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yep, just check birth rates. Negative (under 2.0) in every western country (afaik) for citizens

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Etruscans used arches long before “romans” even existed. Also fitted stone arches are found in some places the Romans never visited, like pre-colonial America.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s still tons of Roman structures standing today.

Imo, there’s a massive difference between a few aqueducts or cobblestone roads still standing from the fall of the Roman Empire and the GARGANTUAN stones that were manipulated to construct the megalithic sites of the world, which like the Sphinx (7-9000 years old MINIMUM) has now proven, are likely even far older than their dates of creation claimed by academia.

If the Romans could have built structures as impressive and long lasting as those who came before them, they would have. But they didn’t. Human history has been demonstrably on a downward trajectory since the earliest evidence we posses, once you overcome the non-sense that is “the fertile crescent was the first emergence of agriculture ever, roughly 10,000 years ago”

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rofl, yeah that’s weak af...

“If you don’t vote for me, you ain’t jewish, Schlomo”

Yeah really lifting the veil with that shit 🙄

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is being so fucking stupid you can’t tell the difference between a link to YouTube and a link to a scientific journal a rational argument?

Is calling an idea “schitzo” and “muddying the waters” before you know the first thing about it a shill tactic?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›