The MOST Ancient had a level of Construction, Design, and Mastery over the physical world never seen since
(www.theancientconnection.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
Dont get me wrong I think this is incredible but to me it just shows a high level of dedication, hard work, practice etc. They had the exact same brains as we do now, the only difference is the tools they had available.
In these beautiful structures you find these perfect joints but in the same or similar buildings you find imperfect joints as well.
There’s no evidence to attribute this to anything other than amazing human talent and techniques and in my opinion to do so is insulting to the people who created them
There is no crane today that could lift the 20,000 TON stones used to construct, for example, the Great Pyramid.
We are barely able to prevent damage from earthquakes. They’ve withstood many THOUSANDS of years of tectonic activity, and remain more precise than we can manage in many domains (stone cutting, shaping, and fitting, earthquake resistance, Electromagnetic resonance, astronomical alignment and holographic representation of the Earth, spiritual/mystical initiation, and so on)
There’s still tons of Roman structures standing today. Not as old of course but proves that humans can build extremely resistant structures for long periods without outside help.
Their stone work is so impressive because they had sometimes hundreds of years to perfect the art.
Check out this video of a guy moving giant stones all by himself. Quality is bad as it’s an old video
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0P4HwmmhykI
Your links are very cool, I think it shows that they had more advanced levels of understanding the world around them than we give them credit for sure
Imo, there’s a massive difference between a few aqueducts or cobblestone roads still standing from the fall of the Roman Empire and the GARGANTUAN stones that were manipulated to construct the megalithic sites of the world, which like the Sphinx (7-9000 years old MINIMUM) has now proven, are likely even far older than their dates of creation claimed by academia.
If the Romans could have built structures as impressive and long lasting as those who came before them, they would have. But they didn’t. Human history has been demonstrably on a downward trajectory since the earliest evidence we posses, once you overcome the non-sense that is “the fertile crescent was the first emergence of agriculture ever, roughly 10,000 years ago”