-2
Graphenium -2 points ago +3 / -5

Frankly, I could go either way on wholesale banning of topics. It seems like the vast majority of the “Nay” votes were coming at it from the perspective of free-speech absolutism. Which is great and all. But that doesn’t mean much of anything if they aren’t willing to reckon with valid counter arguments (such as: spam is already removed, FE is spam - or any of the other good arguments)

I think the key point is that many of us just want to raise the quality level of this place, and removing flat earth spam is almost the “lowest-hanging fruit” of that intent.

Yes, that is subjective, but it benefits no one to be paralyzed by indecision

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +4 / -2

We just can’t say either way! It’s almost as if objective truth doesn’t exist! No I’m not a communist why would you say that?!?

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +1 / -2

Because I oppose mentally ill faggots from sodomizing dogs?

Thanks for admitting you don’t support freeze peach, mongoloid

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +1 / -2

So two factual, on topic comments are “bullshit” and “spam” which necessitate a permanent ban?

Like I mentioned before, follow your dogs into traffic you mentally ill faggot

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nah

Cope, faggot

why

Just so everyone knows your appeals to “free speech” are as disingenuous as every other aspect of your fursona, you fucking moron

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

False, I conclusively demonstrated the existence of a metaphysical layer to reality, and thus strongly indicated the existence of God.

You’re just a parasite infected faggot who fantasizes about fucking animals however, so your response wasn’t surprising.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

We can only pray he will ban insufferable forum sliding faggots who lack even a smidgen of introspection

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

We just can’t KNOW! That’s all I’m saying maaaan - we CANT KNOW!

That’s how I know it’s flat.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +4 / -2

InB4 “the builders of the Great Pyramid were {iN oN iT}”

Edit: InAfter salty flerfer drive-by downvotes so rapidly they couldn’t possibly have watched the video, with zero attempt to reconcile with reality

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +1 / -1

You’ve never even made a post to this site in the two years you’ve had an account. Please don’t act like your contributions come anywhere close to Skil’s

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +1 / -1

In 95% of cases it’s not argued in good faith, even if the person arguing it isn’t literally a bot or shill

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

I want everything to be allowed

Yeah, that’s your problem. I bet your a huge fan of “age of consent” conspiracies and “loli faggotry is ART!” conspiracies.

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hersh has probably the best track record of any “mainstream” journalist alive today (he has been banned from US publication for over 15 years now lmao)

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

Classic, your mentally ill fantasies get proven wrong, so you slink off to some other retarded bullshit.

Parasite infected moron.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

You fucking mongoloid, I posted in this thread before you. Reading responses to my comment is the only reason I saw your faggotry.

YOU 👏 ARE 👏 STUPID 👏 AND 👏 ALSO 👏 MENTALLY 👏 ILL 👏

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

Needs a box that says “Flerfers” off to the side

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

I will never click a link of yours. Ever. You are mentally ill.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ban this fucking faggot while you’re at it, he hasn’t positively contributed once to any board on this entire site despite never shutting the fuck up

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

OP has made a grand total of 2 posts to this community in 3 years.

This topic is not organic.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +3 / -2

600 comments in the vote thread and none of the “Nay”s have even attempted to lay out the case for their “beliefs”. The furthest they get is “censorship bad”, even though they almost certainly support censorship for they things they are capable of identifying as forum siding/bad

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›