Lmao, tell us more how founding members of the forums are bots, and how youre gunna start your own forum, with blackjack and hookers

Or blow it out your ass

You didn’t invent round tables did ya champ? No infact I linked you to one i helped organize years before you even made your account

🚨 retard alert 🚨

1 degree (of 360) every 72 years, yeah you could call that slow

Dude youre straight up having a psychotic break

Leave me the fuck out of it

You must be retarded if you don’t see the other hundred posts I’ve made in the last 9 months, yes

Lmao, I’ve been posting here for 3 years longer than you’ve even had an account retard

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/11R4SXsFdb/the-video-that-woke-me-up-to-the/c

You need to stop being so hysterical if you want anyone to take you seriously

K lol

It’s about you killing every forum you’re on

Protect me? No, to remove your spam lmao

Remember when i got you perma’d from conpro lmfao? I can’t wait until we got mods here

Lmfao, kill yourself shill

Yeah, it’s not clear who the “mod simp” i “pretend to disagree with” is, whereas your status as a spammy nigger who should be in the bottom of a pit is clear as day

Who/what are you talking about

Also yeah, you’re a spammy nigger, what’s not to understand about that

The source is not a congregation, it's a publisher. I'm hard-pressed to find "they" publish more than one author.

Yeah, well obviously the guy running the magazine (or whatever it is, im not following those links lol) and the people writing in who he’s responding to aren’t advocating this shit, they see it rampant in the orthodox community around them and are campaigning against it. Ooooo they’re lefties and maybe even atheists(!!!). At least they can call out evil when they see it written down in front of them. They're braver than most yids. And a helluva lot of Christians, especially the ones who call themselves “zionists”.

there is no doubt that were a comprehensive, in-depth anthropological study done within the contemporary Charedi community, we would find a high percentage of those who act upon their sexual attraction to little children, either because of Halacha’s turning a blind eye or because the act of pedophilia is treated lightly. In other words, the Orthodox community sees sexual activity between adults as more serious than having sex with a child.

On the other hand, the textual discourse of the Orthodox public can be a very significant source of influence upon the viewpoint and lifestyle of the religious or the Charedi person, even creating a reality of legitimate sexual attraction even to children.

The very fact that a religious man treats Halachic rulings seriously (as the words of the living G-d) and because of practical Halacha treats little girls as sexual objects influences his mind.

There is a halacha which forbids being alone with a girl of three and above (Even HaEzer 22:1). A religious man may not be alone with an infant lest his urges overcome him and he sleep with her. The application of this halacha can have an effect on a man’s mind.

These are all factual statements regarding the pedophilic nature of the talmud and the people of the talmud. They also apply to the Talmud’s statements about Jesus. Those statements infect the minds of jews. The fact this isn’t obvious to you is painful to all of us.

jewish joke

Tucker is pretty good, as far as talking heads go

Now do you see why people get pissed off when you contort yourself into a pretzel defending this shit? When you say things like “well, the reason the punishment isn’t listed for raping a 3 year old is because everyone knows what the punishment is and that it will be carried out”, yet here you have an entire congregation of jews who say “no, actually, there is no punishment listed because there is no punishment to be doled out.”

Same with the verses on Jesus.

1. hes explained why he doesn’t post threads. Pretty sure I saw swamp relay to you why that is in another thread a couple weeks ago but I’m not gunna go hunt for it

2. his comments are great if you actually read them and try to understand what hes saying, which is admittedly something that isn’t always easy. But most things worth doing aren’t easy.

3. “flooding” the comments lol? Eh, I don’t see it. What I do see is joeygerbils5 making dozens of low effort spam posts multiple times per day, which legitimately IS flooding this place and you act like hes trying to save the forum by posting shitty screenshots of decade old 4chan posts lol

Fwoc is the farthest thing from a bot this forum has

Seems like it’s about as disputed as the Rebekah one

Hishām ibn ʿUrwa was the only one to narrate the ḥadīth, 13 and he narrated it when he was in Iraq, a time when he was accused of having a bad memory.

Asmaʾ, the older sister of ʿĀʾisha, was ten years older than ʿĀʾisha. Since Asmaʾ passed away in 73 AH/692 CE at the age of 100, this places ʿĀʾisha at eighteen years old when the marriage was consummated.

Fāṭima was born at the time the Kaʿba was rebuilt, when the Prophet ﷺ was thirty-five years old, and she was five years older than ʿĀʾisha, making Āʾisha around twelve years old when she married the Prophet.

ʿĀʾisha participated in the Battle of ʾUḥud. Ibn ʿUmar narrates that the Prophet did not permit him to participate in Uḥud because he was fourteen, but when he was fifteen the Prophet gave him permission to fight in the battle of the Trench (Khandaq). Thus, ʿĀʾisha must have been at least fifteen at the time of ʾUḥud, meaning she consummated the marriage at thirteen or fourteen years old.

ʿĀʾisha narrated in Bukhārī: “This revelation [in Sūra al-Qamar]: ‘Nay, but the Hour is their appointed time (for their full recompense), and the Hour will be more grievous and most bitter’ 14 was revealed to Muḥammad in Makkah while I was a playful jāriya.”

Dawww, thanks big guy, and likewise.

The thing is though, when you present something I don’t already agree with (e.g. CDK), I’ll follow your links in an attempt to understand. It just feels like when you follow my links, it’s an attempt to “debooonk”/cover the source in so many grains of salt as to make it easily dismissible.

You probably don’t see it quite like that. You probably don’t perceive me as as open-minded as I perceive myself. Idk, just putting that out there.

Can you do Mohammed and Aisha next?

The research itself stands or falls on its own

Oh, you’ve finished watching the videos I’ve linked?

And that's like the doctor who predicts the disease will either get worse, stay the same, or get better.

Or is it like the scientist who says “the evidence pattern indicates there will be earthquakes soon, but if you prepare then you can minimize the senseless loss of life” who then gets silenced/ignored for retarded reasons?

So, from this im getting that

1. being a mason is a strike against someone

2. unless you like them, in which case God is using their masonry for good

Why doesn’t this apply to Carlson again? Because masons became extra super duper evil at some point after the founding of America? Because you don’t like how his research points towards timescales > 6,000 years? It’s not clear to me any objective difference between carlsons masonry (which is a strike against listening to what he has to say) and the masonry of the masons you do like.

(I would also appreciate, and remind myself, that we both want to work on collegiality as students comparing notes. I suppose my view on cyclic catastrophes has made it hard for me to do that lately.)

Agreed, hence my seeking clarity on the notion that the guys who I get my notes from are evil muslims, and associating that with me (guilt by association much?) while plenty of guys who you get your notes from are “tools of God, in spite of themselves”

No mention of the founding fathers being lying muslims because of their secret oaths - is I think the double standard i was trying to get you to acknowledge

MUh guilt by association! MUh judge people on an individual basis! MUh fREEEEmAsOnS!!! MUh illOgiCaL dOuBLe sTaNdArDs!!