From the sidebar:
Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.
Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules
(Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
Last updated 2 years ago by clemaneuverers)
Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
⭐ Rule 1 means we can have conversations and disagreements and even suspicions without using derogatory (disrespectful) language. This also means that we can say some people in some people groups are bad but we recognize that not every one of any people group are all the same.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
⭐ Rule 2 means to use the report function for violations but not to overuse it for petty reasons.
Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.
⭐ Rule 3 means not to repeatedly post about other users and bully them but we might have to go total no meta posts because it is easily abused.
To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.
⭐ This means new accounts are unable to post until they have a comment score or a post score (from somewhere else) of 50 points. And you can use mod mail to ask the mod to look into it and approve.
Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.
⭐ This means constant low effort posting with no conspiracy theory or fact will be deleted.
Submission statements are making a come back. It also means we are not tolerating calls to violence (death wishing) and verbal abuse or harassment.
And a reminder that resorting to ad hominem (along with all fallacies) often makes one look emoti(o)nal, desperate and out of actual answers or rebuttals, in other words, you've lost, at least keep your dignity and integrity and try again another time having hopefully learned something.
Spam is often a generalized term and there are differences to me regarding spam from bots and spam from humans, spam bots will immediately be removed and permabanned. For human spam I would consider that being repeating/parroted speech and mass posting in a short amount of time, which will be assumed as forum sliding. Those posts will be removed and the poster will be asked to stop, if it persists there will be reasonable ban action and hopes the behaviour stops.
These have been the same rules since the community's inception and it has been over a year since they were enforced so we've all gotten a little flabby and now we are shaping back up.
Please let me know if any of this is unclear or if any terminology needs to be defined.
No, the filter needs to stay or else the pedo pajeet comes back
Yeah, probably. I do worry about new user difficulties tho.
Just check the queue now and then, their posts aren’t deleted just held for review. Not like “new users” is a problem communities.win suffers from anyways lmao
True, for now, I still have hope for revival.
But it is better to have the limit check in place, I'll try to get guy to understand.
Oof, good luck with that. Maybe start simple with shapes or colors or something.
What a simp 🤣
😂
We can just use pedo the other word is a flaggable derogatory slur. I hope to not have to make a thread of what are derogation slurs and how they are flagged on the internet..
In a perfect world all the name calling would stop all together but I'm having to pick battles carefully.
Language policing titles of posts is one thing, and can be justified, but you’re only going to make your job impossible if you’re going to try to prevent people from saying words like “pajeet” in the comments, much less in the comments of posts that got deleted days ago
As you say, “pick your battles” is the wise approach here
If it's just posts and not comments that's hypocrisy tho. These terms are legitimately flagged perhaps I'll have to make a post about the conspiracy.
Language I'm unable to police would be words like retard, psycho, schizo, those are technical terms of brain damage or affliction.
N;gger and k;ke and cun7 (edit:holy fucking lmao) are all technical terms too
No, that’s called “picking your battles wisely”. Like the guys name is literally “the pedo pajeet”. You are physically incapable of convincing people to call that guy anything else. I strongly recommend you pick any other hill than this. We’re all grownups here. This isn’t the fagbag pRedditor hugbox nor the Facebook tranny safe space. This is the forum for all the people who got banned from those other ones.
What's the matter, afraid of a little woman are ya? 😉
Odd coming from the guy who still hasn’t posted - what part of my replies makes you say that?