▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes it will. If it keeps acting in the way it is. Nigeria has banned it indefinitely. It has a lot of clout with the rest of Africa. India have put it on notice. Myanmar has banned. Malaysia also have an issue with it. Australia as well. China doesn't use much, and are prone to banning it from HK where it was used. You mean Europe where Poland will fine it for banning people and Europe are looking into a big tech tax. The general pop are looking for alternatives. Meanwhile in the USA Florida are about to start fining it for banning people and other states will follow. Israel also have had issues with it. Same as Turkey.

Its days are numbered globally. Nobody likes assholes telling them what to say. People don't mind assholes much. They won't agree with them hence social media. Nobody likes a do gooder being a hypocrite and banning people for speaking.

▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Twitter is sooner starting to get banned globally. Company value is gonna be dogshit. It ain't worth it. Nobody needs a platform they get banned for speaking on.

Twitter is an enemy of free speech. Instead it is Jack Dorsey's showerthoughts. His thoughts exclude anybody he doesn't like. They are unconstitutional. Because they simply advertise his asshole and it is being virtue signalled as incorruptible. But it is a gaping corruption of toxic advertising. Assholes shouldn't tell other people what to say. They are an injustice. Butt out Dorsey, let everybody speak, instead of just your shitty minions.

▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fire makes the water go bye bye. But there are corporate water companies bottling companies like vineyards and agriculture and other entities with exclusion, massively devouring the reserves. Outside of the fire department in another burning festival of California's much celebrated desertification. Reserves draining surrounding rivers and ground water. Meanwhile glacier cover on the Rockies retreats as a source and evaporates. Of course they will start pumping the great lakes and anywhere else to feed their insatiable thirst for even bigger swimming pools and everything else with a funnel and a drain.

California is also an overpopulated leftist shithole. It can't even manage its asshole, so instead it crams the biggest inflatables up it, ballooning into a bunch of scams, robbing taxes, paying for even more overpopulation from the turd world and a bunch of bullshit tech.

So it is water rationing today, what a great place to live. You and you and you cannot own a swimming pool because them and the and it can. But pay more taxes to somebody drinking yours.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jettisoning it would cost nothing. It has made that money from its production. The other resources are expunged in simple waste. How many dumb cars dumb planes dumb computers dumb tvs dumb phones do we waste because they are made to break. Until resources are running out. This planet is saturated in ewaste until there is nothing green. Because we need robots breaking even quicker as a new model comes out daily. We send them into space for free but our chemical and nuclear waste there is no solution for. We create toxicity on a planet with life. It doesn't seem logical.

A nuclear plant is what is needed for these new robotic farms where they create millions of plants and vegetables in the increased greenhouse environment with the lighting and water systems using robots to grow and harvest on huge conveyor belts. Where row upon row is stacked and constantly rotated without any soil. They aren't green or eco. But at least it is consumed by a bunch of overpopulating people needing nuclear things. Things that break and don't recycle but instead create heaps of toxic waste. These have replaced our planet with excess. You are sooner out of a job because AI is feeding you. No sooner banned from growing food and keeping livestock. Everything is grown by billionaires exploiting nuclear energy. They have monopolized food entirely it is lab meat and plant food entirely processed. Any humans are fertilizers. Problem even if we created that method entirely we would also overpopulate and the planet would be as threatened. We still use all the other bullshit which isn't sustainable. Those dumb cars, phones, computers and perishables.

That future we are walking blind into because greedy humans no longer grow or make anything except an evil wasteful ai. It sells them an artificial world. A world where they are nothing but electricity and the value of it.

Humans prior to today's AI exploitation and mass consumption lived for millenniums by actually doing something useful, today they whore themselves for nothing else, so pretty, continuously using machines until they have no use except making somebody taxes.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is our democracy? Pretty sure white people are the most democratic on the entire planet. Strangely it is being sold as somebody else's democracy? Wouldn't that make it non democratic. If it is non white it would statistically be undemocratic. Therefore the greatest threat to democracy is non white people.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahaha Congress intelligence reveals wait for it, nothing. But there could be more funding. Taxes demand further investigation and research demands more theories. But there is no evidence they aren't Chinese. Therefore we require more military spending.

Told you so

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I didn't say bullshit, you have. Read again. Because you're a nigger. You literally the dumbest nigger on the planet. You're autistic schizophrenic and can't read shit. I never said bullshit you did. You have only said bullshit to me. I never asked you for anything either. Why would I ask a nigger for their bullshit. You aren't educating anybody, nigger.

I said this nuclear reactor enriches uranium and it also create nuclear fuel. Because It does fucko. Although it hasn't even been built yet has it, it isn't completed, but that's the idea as it is a rollout out, prototype testing for bigger better designs etc. It might later see plutonium natrium reactors constructed in the future if it takes off. They are much bigger than uranium reactors and this prototype often using multiple cores. Unlike this reactor being a single core.

Mining has what effect and produces which kind of run off and emissions. Away from this reactor which is being developed for efficiency and yield. Not entirely because it is cleaner. This reactor also needs additional resource extraction outside of just uranium.

All nuclear power has nuclear waste, emissions, and run off. Simple fact. Not your bullshit nigger education where you are dumber than my poodle. When it shits it doesn't know any better. You just shit everywhere spamming bullshit. I never asked you for your bullshit.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jettison the nuclear waste into Mars. Or Venus. Make a big stupid rocket and fly it into a barren planet with gravity.

But otherwise we are screwed by our consumption and the greed and hypocrisy of the solutions proposed.

Every solution simply increases demand for profit increasing in consumption, but none of them are environmental. Not one. Although some are slightly better but not by much. Resources are also finite and simply destroy entire ecosystems in their extraction.

Most of these green and renewable solutions are hypocritical and actually simply increase dystopia for no other benefit other than enslavement and corporate profit and increased taxation.

Sure it is nice to dream but we are way too populated for them to be viable for our masses in hyperinflation and debt. They simply increase more energy consumption for even more bullshit services and gimmicks. How many apps does it take to use a phone speaking to a dumb robot. Until we are all postal.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have no fucking clue. It is a nuclear reactor. A prototype reactor the first one being built. All you have done is speak shit to me. Because you are a nigger. You seriously thought you had some special fucking knowledge on a prototype. You said it had no run off and no waste. It is a nuclear reactor. They all do. They all have nuclear waste. More mining outside of uranium is used on this reactor it isn't using water/saltwater as its cooling it is using salts. Requiring additional production, mining run off. They also all emit carbon.

Now fuck off. I ain't on you tube. So no nigger that isn't how this conversation had gone apart from in that stupid brain of yours. Nuclear reactors don't create waste of all the bullshit.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You behave like a stereotypical nigger. You don't talk properly, because you're foreign and when anybody else speaks it gets muddled up in that little nigger head of yours. Like talking to a fucking retard. You police what I said. Replying to my concerns. But not once have you been civil about it. Because you thought what I said was wrong. I haven't been wrong once. Nope.

It is a nuclear reactor. I always held a fucking ace. Unlike your bullshit. The reactor has waste and run off. A matter of fact. It is nuclear. It also constantly needs even more raw materials for its assumed efficiency, largely theoretical because it is experimental. This is the first one built.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop it. It is a nuclear reactor. It still functions as a reactor. Creating enriched uranium and nuclear fuel. Plutonium natrium reactors are going to possibly be built later, after this experimental reactor functions, without it turning Wyoming into a desert first. With a plutonium reactor it would have even more run off.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks again. I think it has more servicing is that angle. Always an angle. It needs the extracted products. Yes at the same time it offers some environmental benefits. Although it still has nuclear waste.

Coal emits true. But it emits less than the woodchip burners creating electricity off incineration all over America, being sold as renewable and green because they recycle scrap wood. But they aren't only burning the wood, they're burning paint, some are burning rubber chips off tires. Wood burning is far more emitting than coal, green wood wet wood sap and lichen. The oxymoron is largely in the mining of coal, but mining uranium is an ugly business. Copper mining is very bad for the environment and so is almost all mining especially rare earth minerals and gems, stripping mining, and the toxic run off created from metals like copper etc. Strangely nobody complains about cooking, it is super emitting. But they will use biofuel, ethanol, it is worse than diesel and is thicker. Nevermind the impact of growing sugar cane or plants turned into ethanol just to burn as it emits twice as much. Diesel was less. Until somebody profited more off recycling for even more emissions.

EVs have almost nothing to do with the environment they're simply the next upgrade costing you more. What they don't emit out of their exhaust they emit in their consumption. Their ridiculously expendable lifetimes. Everything electric breaks quicker. Nobody can repair it either, because it is cheaper just to buy a new one. As we are left with mountains of ewaste putting plastic, acids, and batteries and toxic alloys everywhere. More plastic and ewaste in electrics. Now they control you completely, it is all on the same source, inflation, hacked and monitored. Sure they offer hydrogen as well. It is astronomically more expensive and the hydrogen fuel cells deplete much quicker than EV batteries. Like they need servicing every so many refills. EV batteries lasting about 7 years. Well not when you recharge them more and more because everything and your robot dog is plugged into your car.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

The nuclear waste. It is a nuclear reactor we were talking about one stage of its production where it still enriches uranium and also creates nuclear fuel.

Outside of it also storing the excess heat.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for the reasonable explanation offered.

I didn't imply coolant was leaking only that an engine emits as it is in use, and the coolant level constantly needs topping up. Hence the constant run off of further resources needed in energy production and machine use. What amounts does it need to sustain its energy?

It is more energy efficient, because it using more resources. These are supposedly more environmental because it is sodium burning hotter and cooling quicker.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Electric cars are actually worse for the environment. How many more emissions are used in making brand new car manufacture. Rather than in the previous vehicles already manufactured and in use. It will take at least 3 generations of EVs to pay off that debt. Which they won't because they break quicker. Where does the energy come from. Many are still using coal power. Solar and wind need even more costs for the greater demand of even more energy being used, neither are environmental. Ewaste isn't being recycled according to the increasing demand we have already changed epochs from it. Panels contain acids lead and plastic forgetting the battery. Turbines are made from carbon fibre. Regardless, how long do EVs last. The battery lasts about 7 years. Electricity is the first product to break in every car. Most people can't repair those parts. Costing even more services and lessening lifetimes. Every product used creating more emissions to reproduce. Unlike previous gas cars averaging much longer lifetimes for every part. EVs don't recycle like gas cars they are largely ewaste. Their batteries are also much worse environmentally for recycling.

But we are talking about your bullshit, the turbine is a vent. It has hot and cooled processes requiring water. It is a resource being depleted. If it isn't full of the production. Like nuclear water.

Aside from the run off of the constant resources needed to create its energy.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are one stupid bitch coolant for an engine creating emissions. my car has exhaust and vents. It also constantly needs more coolant.

Learn something

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have to get the sodium from somewhere. Creating emissions. The steam realeses vapors, the waste water has particles. Away from any assumed filtration. As it produces energy it constantly demands production. Raw materials.

Stop being illiterate. You are the most stupid fucking idiots in the entire world.

Coolant in my car creates emissions and it constantly needs more coolant.

Sealed system spinning the turbines has vents and it also has water in and out. I agree the diagram shows vents and in and out.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are one dumb scattyfuckus. No wonder you air the gayness. I am not interested in your bullshit. It is a lie.

What are you talking about. You literally can't read. Where did I say socialism was communism. But you have, you dumb faggot. I didn't. They practically are. When communism has directly allied with socialism globally in almost every socialist nation. Every socialist revolution has been fascist.

That is an off topic conversation. We aren't talking about that. I said this paper is socialist crap. It incites stupidity. Stupidity has revolutions becoming fascist or communist. All it takes is some dumb liberal communists first. They aren't socialists or they'd shove their stupidity up their ass and nounce right off bothering somebody else. Instead of being revolutionaries.

I said this paper is a lie. When simple research shows Jesus and Magdalene are lovers, this is in the new testament. In the omitted Gospel of Magdalene they are married.

You haven't once understood this. Or debated it. Literally as dumb a person as you could ever get. Reading your name explains it.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't increased any knowledgevehen no body had answered me properly.

Simple questions not bullshit. Sodium is harmful to the environment particularly most types of flora and fauna. Reactors have run off. Steam and waste water. Facts not bullshit. How is it natural and better for the environment? I haven't learned anything. At all. Instead I have been insulted by butt boys and these faggots bend right over swallowing when anybody says clean energy. Clean energy is a big fat lie. Nothing clean about human activity more humans more faggots swallowing shit. More consumption more costs more waste more energy demanded.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are you babbling on about?

The speculation fucko was is sodium harmful to the environment. Yes. Speculation was does the reactor called natrium, nothing natural about it using a chemical process, create run off. Again the answer is yes

Now answer how using sodium was so much better than carbon? I am struggling to understand it.

I didn't need your life story. I didn't ask for it, I don't care what you studied if you're bullshit and stupid. I speculated and since have had really dumb little bitches tell me really stupid things. The paper shits some advertising, next they're getting vaccinated for free and now their face is crooked, they can't have kids, and their brain is cloted, and their heart is enlarged, then they're in a coma but the press told them to swallow. I don't care about your Chernobyl. Speculation was the above. Not dumb analogies. Not how does it compare to nuclear, it doesn't, it doesn't have the same output.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha, I was literally taking the piss out of the stupid concept offered.

But it seems you cannot answer me why the great Efreet tells his coven of zealots to fatwa and commit suicide, killing many others, because only then will the 72 virgins be sacrificed for them, if they go to hell?

How has Jesus protected you from the great Efreet? His demonic zealots are constantly creating hell.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. I said Jesus was probably married, it is a little known fact. Because the gospel of Magdalene hasn't been published into the new testament. What has been recorded is her being his lover in the version we all have read. Other missing gospels also suggestively add to this. Much of the new testament has been added later, relayering, because there weren't originally 12 disciples.

This paper is socialist drivel. Communists equally hate religion. The reason this bullshit has been printed isn't because it is factual, his marriage is a much more commonly accepted conspiracy and fact because it is in a huge margin of being correct. It was printed for bullshit propaganda hammering the very nails into him. Causing people to turn away from religion when it is an excuse for sin. A sin other religions do not condone, and because they don't their conviction to their faith flourishes today. However this press wants to be god and write the script. It wants to tell us what to believe. Until there is no belief, there is only consumption and advertising.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes but it is in extreme desertification now. Despite parts of the state bordering desert. Because it has sapped its ground water. It is rapidly depleting the Sacramento river and the Colorado river both have drained and dropped beyond all recorded historic levels. As the global temperature increases in this period of warming it causes droughts wildfires and mudslides, creating more dust with little green growth and a water table depleting from agriculture and huge consumption in drought and fire. As the state massively overpopulates and consumes even more rapidly in its next inventions. Until California is becoming a desert in mere decades instead of centuries. Where previously with places like Egypt, it took thousands of years to cause desertification brought on in a similar crude fashion.

There is an increasing danger currently of eruptions and quakes. They could really push some our overpopulated cities completely over the edge into biblical proportions, food shortages and anarchy and mass casualties. If places like New Zealand rumbling today, Yellowstone rising, or any major global eruption erupts. Potentially causing major calamity globally. Not only will it erupt but the plates will also rattle more, and this could be felt anywhere on a fault line. With the increasing affects of our weather it is also having an impact on eruptions and quakes. We are seeing a huge increase in both, until it seems something imminent will erupt bigger.

Aside from the increasing danger of war. It could also see California become a desert.

▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

You got that from a bullshit opinion piece written by the Guardian. It ain't worth the paper it is printed on

Okay gay ass. why has the Pope condemned gays as sin, refusing to bless same sex marriage. The Catholic church won't bless gays despite some congregations calling for it. It won't bless their union.

Somehow you think it was because Jesus was a gay? This is because you have a fetish for buggery, it makes everybody else queer as well. Not flattered not amused.

Jesus was infact married. The gospel of Magdalene. In fact the bible has omitted a few gospels and added others which weren't written in the original version. But Jesus was married. Angels and Demons. The Gospel of Magdalene otherwise proves it, as well as perhaps the other omissions. There is a lot of controversy on the new Testament. It is hugely contentious and was warred over for at least a century among its followers on which version was later compiled. There supposedly weren't even 12 disciples. Christ didn't resurrect in the original print.

Why did they write this shit? Another nail in religion's coffin except it simply makes other beliefs stronger. Like Islam or Judaism flourishing as Christianity simply divides and declines into becoming much less worshipped. These people hate Christ, because they believe in monkeys. They want to write the narrative controlling you like communism.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›