No but words are free speech. I don't agree with being rude first. As some people are primarily on reddit. But they seem to think there is distinguishment between one rude word and another, when they're both insulting. So by all means retort and discuss it. Who really cares until it's just outright abuse. Because words don't hurt, it's the thought or motives behind them that do. Which what the culture on Reddit is. They will insult you attacking, gangstalking, goading, baiting, and cancelling. Then they ban you for being attacked, and simply defending yourself. Where you say fuck off or something. While nobody under 18 should be using this platform or most of Social Media. The news and many likewise topics are simply adult content.
Do really find offense from being called nigger, or kike, or whatever, Online? No, so what's the distinction upon being called a troll? Same insult right. Words are pointless. Until I start saying you eat your cum you filthy gay nigger. Then I am being massively out of line. Abusive, wanting to pick a fight and insult. Which is what they do on Reddit while blockchaining you with down votes. Not quite to that extent but their motivation is plain abuse.
Example and no offense.
It hasn't changed either. Look at it now. Same shills circlejerking the News platforms. They cherrypick headlines from the most absurd sources in order to bait users to flag and then ban. Until it's only them commenting, the same trolls. If you go on a particular subreddit, it's guilt by association and it faster bans you off of others. Even for simply looking.
If you comment on films or movies if you don't echo it's the same thing. Imagine getting banned for not liking Parasite. Completely cancelled because you didn't like a film.
That is its attitude across the entire platform. Where it is so far removed from anything social media. It's an ad campaign where you either echo or die. But then you stop to think about what is being promoted. It has got a strong Chinese influence. Where it incites, goads, and propagates in order to cause chaos and erode policy and institutions.
The trolls running it have a policy where they can reign abuse. Literally ban you for somebody obviously a mod calling you asshole, you respond with asshole, but they turn around and ban you, further calling you asshole upon banning. They're abusive and vindictive and most don't speak English properly. Insanity communicating on Reddit.
You can't have a polite conversation with most there. Their bias is so prejudice and absurd and ignorant. Literally people you would avoid in real life, as dumb as monkeys in a zoo. You're a completely different lifeform. Where they don't communicate in the same language.
Example of that Chinese, you supporting your country is a ban. But if you're anti-establishment against the current government as a fringe leftist group, sewing division, right-wing they got the memo from establishment Russian or whatever their boogeyman, they actively propagate. You weren't even politically affiliated. You simply supported your government. Ban. Try it go into your national News
The other alarming thing is where they allow speech from. So tired of their Bullshit bans. I VPN and if I choose Europe or America it was far less favourable than Africa, Asia, or Latin America.
I can show several clips of tanks rolling over cars. They do this to stop potential IEDs or barricades
The nuclear plant is on fire, I saw a live cctv feed. Not serious yet.
Buildings destroyed it looked like Eastern Europe. The pictures in the press today. Images of Kharkiv and the battle around Kyvi airport. Where it has showed a notable building a townhall damaged supposedly a warcrime until you saw somewhere else with a bunch of combatants inside singing the national anthem firing ak47s into the ceiling. Nope. But the pictures of the firemen putting out fires of Ukraine buildings. Heaps of explosions from civilian cams, army cams of soldiers firing. Drone strikes on Russian military. Etc etc.
Seen fake stuff as well in the news.
No it's quite real. What don't you understand about the fact it has to be?
This is real and the stakes are much higher. But all wars have opportunity and agendas.
It just didn't fit into the narrative that's been playing by some people already. I don't have to repeat it. It's out there already by using the title fake war and you're gonna come across it. They're stuck on the propaganda instead how and what it affects and why.
But regardless war like fire can spread and it reacts. There isn't set policy for it. It can cause confrontation igniting.
Although where has been formulated. It's not random. Begging why. No it's not propaganda when it causes policy.
They do have a small point. But absurdly they're not considering it, past any propaganda. I agree there are a lot of fake streams and reports. But studios have done this from warzones and conflict regions for longer today. It has gotten so much easier to broadcast from a studio then actually being on the ground. In doing so they can recreate an evironment cheaper and risk free rather than being there. Instead of previously making entire movies off of war footage.
It's simply a narrative they're stuck on, yes it's a conspiracy. But not to the extent of a fake war.
Thanks.
Aren't sicilians, niggers?
You're focused on propaganda not on causality.
Who cares what a network shills from a studio. Most is fake and gay. Why do I need some cunt writing the paper's opinion, when it's in print anyway the next day. Why do I need sport news when a separate channel shows it. Why do I need a talkshow instead of a detailed documentary on any talking points. Why the hell do I care about political parties when no matter what inflation still bites and bills keep rising, as any policy rarely changes, except to cause more dystopia. Why do they act out the weather for the week, when it changes anyway. Who cares what they shill. It doesn't get much better, when it only gets worse.
What are the immediate results, how do they affect policy. What's the play or agenda.
Sure you believe whatever you want. Somehow you're ignoring any affects.
You are bonkers if you think there isn't a war. If somehow you think they can wage a fake war by using moon landing footage. How many millions are they kidding? All those soldiers, all those people. The planet. Dream on. All because you saw a network's gay stream? Blue screen. Nope it has to be real to force policy and agenda. Dumb ass.
Fake? It's not fake. But it creates opportunity.
Nato is back to spending. It means that Europe is sooner doing deals away from the Union. It has rallied and starts to allign back to its military treaty and those commanding it. Profiting others making direct deals. How do the redlines openly crossed suddenly close. Perhaps causing better policy on security of the Internet, and media. Price of oil/gas rising sooner causes renewable investments. Supply lines get rearranged on a host of production. What about any others. How does it ripple affecting them. Do they get pushed back, or are sanctions worked around. What about the economy. What about races and competing solutions?
How far does that rabbithole go. I'd probably stay out of it. But fuck you Alice.
Sanction one oil/gas Russia releasing the other Iran. Sounds like a really dumb strategy. Who are Iran's guarantors on nuclear waste, and water. Russia were on the previous deal? And no matter what it still pisses off Israel. But they must be desperate to make immediate terms.
Because it would turn into a very unclear war. Which is very much what it could still turn into.
The doomsday clock at this point fails in its creation if it puts itself forward more, perhaps even triggering it. Because of the panic created. But those odds as escalation continues are becoming grim.
Policies colliding being forced by hidden hands often of something cold and calculating and inhumane, how much more can be squeezed before the other yields and breaks. Until in increasing probability this species has yet again to remember just who its gods are.
Or do us all a favour and find middle ground. Seemingly unheard of. The other wants what the other cannot give. Therefore something must get broken.
The point made is have you tried giving your kid a credit card. First thing they spend it on is a freemium game. By the time they get to uni, look at that Beckham and his attempted cooking.
Allowance has faster run up the debt.
There's a reason it's called the red army. Play on words. But historically. Messy. While the West tends to employ far more words and sanctions and propaganda.
But in answer no, not the mindset at all.
At this point it's all in. It has been since diplomacy has failed, and any terms or concessions, have escalated into confrontation and warfare. There are still truces to be made. But Russia will do it from strength, before fully seeking them, as existing terms and preconditions weren't met.
Both know the battle for Kyvi would be pivotal. It is where some of the fiercest fighting has been and likewise in its second city and many others when it descends into urban combat. But you can bet yeah. Once command structures go, that traction gains ground quickly. So it has been imperative to hold them together and propagate morale.
While I might agree with some existing assessments that it has been messy perhaps slightly rushed at Kyvi because of its representation to the battlefield. But I don't agree with everything aired. No it doesn't mean if it goes Ukraine completely folds, but from there any ground becomes dominated. Currently almost everything is supporting it. I bet it will become more formulated as Eastern positions become overrun. The airfield there has been quite bloody perhaps changing hands a few times. Important for Kyvi supply lines. But once it's surrounded by formation and formulation as with any previous waves in attack patterns, by wave 10 those bosses are even stronger.
Edit; busy. But yes. Perhaps a position of dominance would be assertive of that Eastern Geography and further squeezing the largest city into terms or truce. I don't think at this point by further being pressed into it they have much to lose by not fully demilitarising the resistance.
I would hate to guess. Messy above btw doesn't mean unprofessional, it simply means it has always fought harder despite losses, or an assumption of weakness. In regards to an enemy menacing and perhaps even cannibalistic.
Yawn. How many times? What false flag. They're in Ukraine attacking it, with a huge contingent of their standing army. What level of nail biting hysteria and paranoia do they need a false flag to justify further attacks?
Almost everything coming out of Ukraine falls under propaganda. It simply isn't very credible at all. Cut off by war and doing everything to hold morale together and also call on more support. Russia isn't either.
Most Western sources supporting Ukraine using Ukrainian rhetoric are also quite unreliable. They're inciting propaganda for Ukraine. Check the national feeds for better updates and broadcasts. But avoid online press and social media platforms airing it.
It just gets worse. This is no future. No future where you have freedom.
Think about a credit society. Pure slavery. Increasing debt and inflation. Services to service services increasingly digital employing even less and less. Adding the dumbest Ai operators and bot driven response. Computer says no. Alexa simply says put your fork into an electric socket. Because insurance must now insure insurance. Until you must also have a social credit score to die because a burial costs you more to live. Unless you're turned into state run energy, then it's free to pay even more for a depleted charge, after they've picked away at your carcass harvesting any organs to shove into another pig monkey. No longer can you even pay your kid an allowance, them saving it up, because no sooner do they burn it through paypal or a credit card. Where all it does is cost even more. Every transfer monitored going to another gambling company that gambles its investments paying China for even more nukes.
Nobody asked for this. Who voted for it. No sooner in absolutes have the greedy employed it. Inhumane.
Volunteers go first. Think about that. They're rostering the women and men. You're signing up to that as a non civilian. What is your status. Your own nation has disavowed your existence. You might as well be a minesweeper.
Please go right ahead.
My only concern is it is becoming HOT. The more direct intervention and absurd rhetoric there is. It increasingly runs that risk.
These headlines are of particular concern. Romanian Mig 29 shot down. On the same headlines through back channels they're being sold to the Ukraine. Georgia and Moldova seeking to torpedo EU membership. Nations allowing mercs through. Unfactual bias and controversy. Deputy PM suggesting he will hunt Russian commanders down for warcrimes. Last time we employed a fact checker Russia aren't part of the ICC and they have veto power. But to trial for warcrimes requires you to capture an enemy so they stand trial. Because sanctions aren't effective.
The more this shapes it will become hot. If these online press and social media platforms don't take a step back and provide facts.
BTW again back to warcrimes look it hasn't been hit. But what is a combatant when men and women are rostered, and where another headline reads Ukrainian children are now picking up guns.
I am not picking sides. What I say has been right. Look at the objective. Timing. Scale. Just announced.
My worry here is the madness propagated spewing pure controversy goes Hot. It is drumming up an outcry for what intent. To leave Aleppo hanging? Or does that risk above escalate, Romanian Mig 29, not flying Nato, not yet. Where Romania has hosted American nukes.
A Nobel in the Nobel peace prize tried selling guns to Russia then made a fortune off oil from there. Stalin also came from there. Sponsored by. He was originally defending it and bringing it to peak capacity. One of the original oil fields.
Irony
I understand that. But I am not picking sides.
I understand Russian security concerns like I understand Ukrainian Sovereignty. Neither are right. But who am I to say that. Duke it out.
Sorry wrong topic.
What does it have to do with my comment exactly? Azerbaijan support. Where logically they just did similar. Hence possible support. Irregardless of another assumption.
They did just send Rocket Launchers. And Ukraine's most renowned battalion could have access?
But the Canadians, and British also have. Watched a doc where they were specifically working alongside them. The doc was on BBC news when Gavin Williamson was defense minister. They captured the rebel separatist responsible for the plane being downed or were attempting. Cannot remember if it was positive but it certainly added the fact aid and training were provided to Ukraine.
Irony and hypocrisy is everywhere today.
My stance is I frankly don't care about another battalion playing soldiers. However I find it tedious that battalion would be outlawed anywhere else. In the nations that have supported it. Objectively what is right and wrong. Fight fire with fire. But stop being hypocrites cunts. Outside of soldiers doing a duty. I am not debating, I don't know it.
Wasn't it among sanctions for Syria, or Novichok, when Russia was banned from the G summits? It might not have been all of the Russian oligarchy off the forum. Until perhaps now.
Why was he a member because of global leadership. Like China was invited and even headed it briefly.
Trump's presidency questioned China on it, and questioned why Russia wasn't reinstated back to the G summits.
But I could be wrong?