Link it. Don't you think they can make videos to support narratives.
Why would he say it?
A) Somebody can Time Travel, certainly it was being committed towards, it was a hot topic since H.G Wells, everywhere, novels, comics, research, Einstein.
B) Because there's a former record, in all that former press of jewish persecution.
C) He was going to kill them.
D) It's for today's narrative. What was the full context? If he said it, you have literally turned the translation into Hitler's greatest quotes. Why, how, what is the entire speech?
Yea you're D, supporting a narrative, B, for C. Well A. See you've made time travel happen. Mandela affect.
I should stay away from this. The past has occurred. No changing it.
Really, I think a lot of this shit is manipulated. Look it provokes the Mandela affect. That affect was in the 1900s they were cementing the narrative of 6 million Jews being persecuted and killed in Europe. It was all over the press, also begging for Israel to be returned. Look it up. Press decades before he existed. Decades before concentration camps. With the exact same figure of 6 million.
But if he did, it's because somebody has figured it out. Ultimately because it's the Mandela affect.
No I am not anti semitic. I find articles like that curious they're on public record during the time when a bunch of giant bones disappeared. All that excavation, no mention of dinosaurs, until after the war. Then the Dinosaurs are turning up everywhere else, because the giants disappeared. Not getting into jews, but there's a pattern. It's called the Mandela affect. But has somebody figured out the time travel. They don't even need too with a narrative. It's like a big huge eraser or memory wipe.
Energy generates profit. No wonder they're pushing renewables. All they are is another tax hike. Seriously, more consumption causing more profit. Obviously with it, an increasing price. Will they better society. Not in any meaningful way. Outside of more consumption. The big white elephant, a hoax.
Breaking them down further, they cost more for less, pure money maker. Need more energy for even more stuff running on it. All on a single source powering everything. It couldn't be easier to control, regulate, tax, and profit. Lifetime non existent. You will buy Windows 12 or you will die. You will die anyway when they turn it off, and it costs whatever they say it does. Like a railway ticket. More energy, more consumption. Need more energy because more consumption. Look at that price, it's like taxes, it goes up every year, and with it more laws taking your freedom away making sure you pay it. Beautiful really. No, absolute irony.
They are with flight requirements. It would cause chest pains, tiredness, loss of breath. Cannot have pilots with anything like this. They are heart tested. And they get regular bloodwork, and piss. Even haulage has started making laws. Some absurd law recently came out, in Europe, on water, dehydration. Another one showing Covid concerns.
Medical records are logged. They aren't confidential in that industry because they're submitted to the pilot licensing. They have regular testing due to recent science, bloodclot, etc, risks from flight. Regs started changing from my uncle a commerical pilot in the 70s, chain smoker, he passed away in the 80s. Those days nothing of note, some flights I mean my God, no regs. But recently there are huge regulations. Even on getting licensed for charter planes. Sometimes they lack if you own that stuff. But they have these health and safety bodies today, they're like the FBI, or what athletes get. It's not only that industry but heaps of other GOV. Regular health tests. Of course they then awe, but they better recruit the women, all of sudden their hormones don't mean shit, or the monkeys without regulations. They come over on their bullshit license, next they're making a terror attack. But you know.
These Assholes are just greedy. They've been swamping the population with immigration for profit. The only thing driving their dumb economy. More immigration, more growth. Suppress the national population fill shortfalls with immigration. Keep inflating the price causing debt and tax they control. They've been the result of global population booms. They have put cheap factories in poor nations causing population explosions, simply to sell more services. They stopped wars, and laws like execution, plenty of others. It culled the population. They removed tyrants culling their populations.
Instead as soon as there are numbers, they create bullshit. Numbers they profit off of far more. Where is the bigger market home, or abroad. Numbers they control at home by their bullshit medicines and products they've specifically designed for population control because it threatens their wealth. Wealth they make off of other numbers caused by cheaper labour, and selling them more services. They have suppressed the nations they call their home, by inflation, mass immigration, a host of laws, less home ownership.
I'd be calling for the guillotines at this point. Those people on the WEF have no point. They only know their own greed.
For the children. What a joke. What children? Abortion, child labour they exploit abroad, or the population they've suppressed, and now they expect people to decrease their longevity before their lifetime, a lifetime of bondage.
Um, America has more Sand. It has Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, plus a larger Coastline, and other states with desert like Texas, Colorado, Nebraska, California etc etc. More Sand. Big deserts. It must be fun, not knowing shit. Wait it must be slang for you don't speak English. What the fuck does that phrase mean? Apart from the stupid projection, again, of that kid pissing themself, super patriotically. Angry it voted for the bullshit.
England created your culture. You're calling your language English. I'm calling it American, because it stinks of slang. You're not proud of it either. Otherwise that dumb projection again wouldn't be wetting itself.
Dumb donk. You come from a bucket.
Haha. It's American. You don't speak Engwish. But you wish you did. You speak American. It has its own dictionary. An American dictionary and it contains a bunch of slang, called American.
Try it asshole. Go to England. They'll tell you that you're an American, because you speak, American. It definitely isn't English, otherwise they wouldn't call you an American. Your words, sounds, and dialect is as repugnant as your name to a Brit. Because it pronounces things in American. It isn't English. They speak English in England.
Your poor eyes, have a drop of English, why don't you? Stop thinking that everybody cares about your slang.
Capslock wets themself. More dumb projection.
Can't meme, and posts the baby pics. Stereotypical projection. Wets themself and must have gotten really pissed about something else. Obviously a dumber donk. Partrioically defends a fetish, and it votes for the bullshit. Tell the rest of the class what it is? Outside of dumb projection. Why so patriotically pissed? If conspiracy theorists voted wrong. You'd be larping. Instead of wetting yourself.
Where do these dumb donks come from?
Are you nuts. I am on the Internet. I am not writing formal letters. English must not be your first language? You need grammar to read it.
You're not sure that pilots are responsible for the lives of hundreds. Potentially thousands. Tell me what happens if a plane crashes? Twin Towers. No. But. Did you believe in this bullshit instead? Did you think pilots don't get health tested? Did you think because without a comma, it's not medically logged when they see their doctors? How do you prescribe this topic's health conditions. Exactly asshole, think, instead of comma. It's clear you have no grammar either. It's an ability to understand what's written. FREN!!!
No pilots have health checks. They have them every 6 odd months. Heart is tested like an athletes. Even haulage drivers are having this shit done not as much as pilots. There are some exceptions in certain privately owned facilities, and charter planes. Leading airlines hell no. Medical records are logged. They even have piss tests. Regulations recently have tighten right up on all commercial airlines.
There have been heaps of pilots affected by the vaxx. Keeping quite about medical conditions. Nope. So they see a doctor and it's logged. They go to get health tested and it's logged.
The next Government won't be any better. It's all part of the plan anyway. Simply to push weapinising more renewables. Hey they aren't cheap either. At least you get more diversity programs, they'll nominate an equal opportunity workforce. 1 Cuck, 2 lesbians, and 3 Chinese, and a Koala. They're as brutal.
This was a film, or at least a cartoon on Netflix. But specifically, the paradox of Hitler's assassination by time machine, prior to him starting the war.
Did he even write that quote. Strangely the persecution of 6 million Jews in Europe, was a mainstream narrative in all the leading press for decades prior to Hitler.
Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.
You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing. A joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand, or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes are massive distribution, and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. The potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.
They don't care about a few peasants, or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war, they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting, and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.
Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.
There are heaps more concerns. Security and restructuring those lines, and eliminating risk, or containing it. But the population has caught up. The tech has advanced quicker than the debts of implementing it slower, or the geopolitics of it affecting other logistics. Away from this, they're mostly naive to almost anything but the greed they're empowering from the demand they're forcing. It has advanced and they use it too assume control. Cannot have it, without the other run off, being precipitated. As a result it implodes. Too what degree is the only question? But that future ahead is dark. It doesn't calm without its run off affecting far more. It didn't care anyway, because it was never about anything else, except assuming control.
I don't understand this post at all.
Nato was the aggressor in this situation. Russia invading today is irrelevant to the fact it was under a direct threat to its security.
How and Why is a huge bag of opposing interests, dating back centuries. Notably some are much more recently.
But the bottom line is Crimea is Russian. Contrary to any other assumptions. It has Sevastopol on it. The rest of Crimea largely supports that interest. It has a majority population of Russians and Russian infrastructure on it.
It however causes a huge geographical problem to the Ukrainian coastline. A coastline in 2017 that was building Nato bases on it, a few KM away from Russian nuclear bases. If you wanted the direct evidence of Nato aggression. Outside of any supposrd biolabs. Or arming the Ukraine population to fight against Russians, its own people wishing to remain Russian. Prior to this conflict, the risk of it was happening daily in the Black Sea. Nato vessels, were continously becoming hazardous to the point of collision. Risk that could only escalate into conflict. Conflict occurring as Ukraine sought to join Nato and armament continued threatening Russian infrastructure. Without further debating any other separatist Oblasts.
Of course Ukraine has its own security concerns, and costal issues. Although they are largely irrelevant. Without Nato expansion, and by neutrality, it wouldn't have occured to the level of the current conflict.
It would be unheard of for this not to have escalated anywhere else globally. It was inevitable. Simple consequence.
It doesn't mean I am Russian. But war was obvious. Obvious due to the geography. Outside of opposing interests and geopolitics. You simply cannot tell a nation to pack up their nuclear bases. Try it. Laughably, conflict.
Russia is getting nothing it didn't already have. That's the irony. So it's actually losing more. Had it lost it. Wants it back. How much does that cost. It has even blown it up. But it's hurting the West playing a game with it? Ironic. Not at all.
The West has used it to further its own agenda. Brand new technology. Brand new supply lines. Brand new competition. It also gets to close down any other activity. Clearly a case of this and definitely not that. No other choice. Of course there's immediate provocation, inflation, redistribution, and potentially greater conflict. What has the West committed with, yet. Nothing at all. Instead it just strengthen its partnership, its trade, and its resolve.
Because it hurts the west. No it hurts a bunch of other assholes more. Dumbass
Russia is getting what? What exactly. Ironically, is it even worth considering? Please tell my why I need to be convinced. You made this personal. So convince me. Because it sounds just like a little kid blowing raspberries. Russia wins. Wins what. Whatever it says. Hang on that's still nothing yet. It had claimed stuff. I agree. That's there's and nobody else, okay, tell that to Ukraine.
What is Russia getting. That tweet. It's counting chickens, before it has even won the coop. Even if it wins part of Ukraine, like the monkey part, where they're sabotaging, protesting, and generally shouting. What has it won. But it must be because Nato has capitulated, and not that other part of Ukraine, with the nuts and bananas, but Nato stops arming resistances, and it stops inciting them. Um figure that one out in 10 years after Russia has it. 10 years later and they want to reintegrate back into the rest of the Ukraine, they call it perstrokua. Peace, sure Russia can make a deal. Peace they promise, but are they listening, or are they throwing the nuts and bananas.
You mean Russia wins its gas. Because Europe stopped using it. Or is it buying from somewhere else. Because there's always another vendor.
Aw you're real cute when you down vote.
I have had enough of entertaining a fool. It's what you are. You responded to me. Read it, and you speak like a nigger. It's because you have no concept and no grasp. Why is that. It takes a special kind of stupid. The kind of stupid that only exists in places where stupid is being taught. I look at your username. It explains it. You have an impediment to the truth. You simply call everything a lie, and that makes it real simple excusing why you're dumb.
At what funking point. Baby level. Autism. How if Nato are gaining members are they weaker? Superiority obviously. Go and figure that one out? But then you cry bids can be rejected. No. They just signed a security agreement anyway. It means the USA and Nato will defend them. If Britain gets attacked, defending them, it has an agreement with Nato. You stupid nigger.
Russia wouldn't survive any nuclear war and neither would the planet. Russia's population would be blinked out in minutes and the majority of its silos and capability. Sure it could pop a few off prior, triggering a few more. Nothing in comparison to what would be hitting it. Nothing comparable. Even though it has the most on the planet. Can it hide out in the mountains surviving an extinction level event. Maybe. But then so could everybody else.
Get it through your nigger skull. What missile speed? Payload is from ICBMs. They have the largest warheads. They are hypersonic on re-entry. Nato's European grid is covered with precision Sat radar. Across its member states, and it has a name look it up. Other nation's like American Haarp, European Haarp, is it in Norway, and where else. Used to be that stuff on Sardinia or Corsica, but it has moved too, who cares. Eastern Europe just upgraded their radar, an Aegis now possibly also called a Neptune shield is up. No what. Romania had Aegis. Like Japan. Poland has just upgraded its. Canada's detection.
Stop being a nigger. You're fucking dumb.
I can put money where my mouth is. Go find it.
Stealth are being detected, true. But not completely at all. Not by advancing stealth at all.
It's a pointless debate. Nobody wants that escalation. Everybody gets hit. What's left? Hence there is a MAD doctrine. It hasn't gone anywhere. But you don't believe in nukes? Or did you think those nukes can beat all the other nukes? Tedious.
Petty insults are pointless. I came here to debate this press not fuel your fetishism.
It makes no difference. Training monkey to fight, is easier than using your own troops. Oh you are?
The Nato doctrine. Giving money to monkey too fight, so they don't have too. Look at how that works. Poor monkey.
I didn't care about Monkey then either. It's an amusement, watch the circus. Monkey fight now. Have a banana. Who do I bet on?
Seriously you make best jokes. I didn't care until you got all bothered.
Can only change the future. Never the past. The past has occurred. Rewriting the past changes the future. It's a conundrum. There is the present, it loops, replaying the past, or it splinters going forward into a new version of events, or it continues on its path. But the past has happened. Changing it, changes the future.
What are you even changing? A narrative. Yawn. It's there because the past has occurred. By changing it, what future do you forsee?
Hence the Mandela affect. A narrative that erases the past to dominate the present, causing its future to remain intact.
Ultimately it won. It can say what it likes about the past. Who are you to argue with it. You can only point out the irregularities of it inserting itself or its version of events. They will only lose like it did in that past. Or do win against it, and create a new narrative. In doing so you've replayed the past. What does it mean?