I never claimed you made that claim. I have only stated that I have learned this from you.

Your cognitive dissonance is quite concerning.

And yes, I am reading your comments. It's why you post them is it not?

No, I am not posting just so you can read my comments. Holy shit, how self-centered are you?

The water in the video is in freefall

You are almost there.

How can it be in freefall in orbit if the earth is flat?

Did I trigger you again? Are you following me around, reading all my messages just waiting for the moment when you can post a GOTCHA?

I'm not going to have sex with you. No matter how much you stalk me.

Where exactly have I ever claimed that the WEF is bad? Provide a direct quote or admit that you are either lying or seriously lack reading comprehension.

What force is applied to water in zero gravity?

How is water in zero gravity "falling"?

Think very carefully about your answer. You are almost there.

Kek

Yes, and?

Your point?

Where did I ever say that the WEF is bad?

You obviously are very confused. At least you admit it.

Time to get help?

Alex Jones said it so it must be true.

It cannot and does not, under natural conditions, curve convexly in the manner the globe model requires.

Let me show you something

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzahpSqGbVg

And yet he doesn't.

Meta has blocked news on Facebook, not the Canadian government.

Is Meta the government?

Did you actually read the article?

There is even a Satanic Bible. They hold up Satan as a model figurehead.

Then it should be easy to provide some quotes.

Aaaaaaand you're moving the goalposts again, asking for a SCOTUS case involving demon worship specifically. I already told you, as did the first two sources, there isn't one, they don't take bullshit cases.

Then why did you claim that SCOTUS said that demon worhsip is not protected by the first amendment? You are the one who brought SCOTUS into the discussion, not me.

Mat is spotless clean after 5 months.

You are just making things up btw. Have you noticed?

"Maybe this, maybe that"

If you have to resort to speculation it means that your argument is hollow.

In my view, you both have evidence.

Flat earthers have no evidence.

what specifically do you want “presented”?

The evidence for a flat Earth that you claim exists

You won't do it of course because there is no such thing.

You will instead again post some meaningless drivel and lame excuse.

Speaking from personal experience?

Who took the picture?

He looks clean, healthy and well groomed. Totally what you would expect after spening 5 months in that room.

Are you really that gullible?

The point is that these aren't acting roles. They are appearances in the media.

Totally real. Prisoners always get locked up in rooms with open power outlets.

How fucking stupid does one have to be to believe this?

Did you actually read the entry?

Tell me, what roles are listed there?

It was you, not me who invoked SCOTUS. Why do you lie?

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/irs-satanic-temple-church-tax-exempt-826931/

So how does that compute with your logic?

Since the Church of Satan worships demons, but says they don't worship and that they are only a secular philosophy, then 1A freedom of religion doesn't apply to them.

That's just your fucking opinion. Provide a quote from SCOTUS that mentions demons or admit that you are a liar.

Providea quote from the Satanic Temple that they worship demons or admit that you are a liar.

Here is a novel thought: it is possible to seperate the argument from the person.

The Church of Satan worships Satan

Please find any quote by them that supports this idiotic claim.

I gave you a source.

A blogger's opinion is not relevant. Privide the SCOTUS ruling.

The Church of Satan does not worship Satan.

You are hilariously ignorant.

Now please present the SCOTUS ruling that states that demon worship is not protected by the First Amendment.

Put up or shut up.